PC5 pulled from consent order PC6 PC7 PC8 PC9 approve
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
This archive found it in the recording: a call to order, a recess, or business the board never listed. The county recorded nothing about it, so everything below is our reading.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, May 16, 2024
The published PDF. Its text could not be extracted, because it is an image-only scan, so nothing in it is searchable here. It still reads normally.
The county’s minutes for Planning Commission, May 16, 2024
The published PDF. Its text could not be extracted, because it is an image-only scan, so nothing in it is searchable here. It still reads normally.
What was said
Machine transcription of 5m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 52% of 25 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Following item PC five, which is PEG 247783 in the name of Dayan and Jordana Bujinovich is going to be pulled from consent. We do have some folks here who are in opposition to the item.
So we're gonna move on to item PC six.
And that is PEG 247784. It's in the name of Willem J. and Brent A. Norwood, Norwood Irrevocable Trust, and Norwood Workshop LLC. Norwood Irrevocable Trust. It's for a change in zoning from an R1MH single family mobile home district and C2 General Commercial District with conditions to a C2 General Commercial District with a voluntarily agreed upon deed restriction related to the Live Local Act. Comes to you with a recommendation of approval.
Okay, is the applicant present? Is there anybody here? Did you want to speak? Okay.
Okay. Anything from up here? Everybody good? Okay.
Move on to the following item. Item PC seven is PEG twenty-four seven seven eight six. It's a zoning amendment. Wilson Jader and Matthew Hernandez. It's for a change in zoning from an MPUD Master Planning Unit Development District to an AR agricultural residential district. Comes to you with a recommendation of approval.
Okay, is the applicant present? Uh
on this one, I'm gonna read a couple of of corrections into the to the um into the record. So those were sent to the Planning Commission members and also to the clerk's office. There was incorrect notation in the references section in terms of the location of the board meeting. So it should say PC at NPR 51624, BCC at NPR six eighteen twenty-four, and then also in In finding of fact number eight, the there were three actions on the
site, and now they're listed as two, which is the correct actions that occurred on the site. Again, those have been provided to the clerk's office.
Okay. Um is there anybody here to speak on this item?
Anything up from up here?
Okay. Next one.
Next item, you're sitting as a local planning agency. It's item PC8, PEG 240098. It is a comprehensive plan amendment, CPAS 2317, Hudson Commercial. It's for a comprehensive plan amendment to future land use maps 2-15 and SHEITO3, changing from IL Industrial Light to COM. on approximately 4.82 acres of property located on the north side of New York Avenue. If you would please take public comment on this item, we're asking that you find the
item consistent with the Pasco County Comprehensive Plan and that you recommend the approval to the Board of County Commissioners.
Okay. Is the applicant present? Is there anybody here to speak on this item?
Anything from the dice?
Okay. And then the following item is PC nine. You're also sitting as a local planning agency on this matter. It's PEG twenty-four zero two six two, comprehensive plan amendment, CPAS twenty-three twenty-five, fifty-two Realty Commercial is for comprehensive plan amendment to future land use maps two-fifteen and sheet twelve. Uh which is changing from res three residential three dwelling units. per acre to COM Commercial OF Office and C O N Conservation on approximately 8.84 acres on the south side of State Road 52,
approximately 3,300 feet west of Land O' Lakes Boulevard. On this item, if you would please take public comment, we're asking that you find it consistent with the Pasco County Comprehensive Plan and recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners.
Okay, is the applicant present? Is there anybody here to speak on this item?
Okay. Anything from up here? All right, and I
think that concludes your consent agenda.
Okay, so we have PC six, seven, eight, and nine.
On the consent. So a motion to approve the consent order consisting of PC six, PC seven, PC eight, PC nine with the corrections noted to PC seven that Denise read into the record. Okay,
is there a second? Motion a second. Any other discussion? All in favor? Aye. Aye. Opposed? Motion carries.
Thank you.