Rezoning consent agenda approval
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Aug 22, 2023
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Aug 22, 2023
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
Machine transcription of 7m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 90% of 62 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Aye. That'll take us to the consent agenda.
Um
Uh Tam
Penny
for Pasco Tampa Bay
Times July 5th 2023. P sixty eight is P D D twenty three C U03, which is under the name of Hope Home and Lee, LLC and Priya properties, LLC, Urban 54 estates. This is conditional use for multiple family dwellings in a C2. The project is proposed to be developed as a mixed-use development. It does have your condition requiring it to be used. um developed as a mixed use development and it does have the l live local act condition comes to you with a recommendation of approval with conditions as included
in your agenda packet from the planning commission and the board and the uh the planning and development department staff.
Okay. Is there anyone here to to speak in opposition to P sixty eight?
There is no one signed up or on WebEx.
Leave my consent. P sixty nine, do we have proof?
Uh Tampa Bay Times, June 7, 2023.
PDD 237705 RBR properties of West Florida LLC. RBR properties is for a change in zoning from an R1 Rural Density Residential District and C2 General Commercial District to an I1 Light Industrial Park District. The applicant has voluntarily agreed to record a deed restriction consistent with the Live Local Act so that the the location provided. Light industrial development. There's also a condition regarding a voluntarily agreed upon deed restriction
regarding the material recovery facility. Comes here with recommendation of approval with conditions from the Planning and Development Department and the Planning Commission.
Okay. Is there anyone here to speak in opposition to P sixty nine? We'll leave it on consent. Uh I'm gonna pull P seventy as we talked earlier. So you order P seventy one.
Tampa Bay Times, July fifth, twenty twenty three.
P71 is PDD 237724 in the name of Charles P. Cassen, Revocable Trust, and GTC LLLP for a change in zoning from an R1MH single family mobile home district to a C2 General Commercial District with a voluntarily agreed upon deed restriction reserving uses to those uses set forth in C2, also known as the Live Local Act. Voluntarily agreed upon deed restriction comes to you with a recommendation of approval from the Planning and Development Department and the Planning Commission.
Okay. Anyone here to speak in opposition to P seventy one?
There's no one signed up.
I don't see anyone approaching, we'll leave it on consent.
Tampa Bay Times, July fifth, twenty twenty-three.
EDD 237667, Decubelus and Little Road, M Little MPUD, Master Plan Unit Development, Little G Little Gene D, Little Terry W, Little Peter A, rezoning from a C2 Journal Commercial District, ER, a state residential district, and an AC agricultural district to an MPUD Master Plan Unit Development to allow the development of a maximum of 384 multifamily. units of twenty one thousand square feet of commercial retail on approximately 17.99 acres comes to you with a recommendation of approval with conditions as included in your
agenda packet from the planning and development department and the planning commission.
Okay. Anyone does there anyone in the audience to speak against P seventy two?
Uh Miss Elmore spoke earlier under P fifty eight. I don't see her. She signed up for this one too. Maybe her comments for this one also.
Okay. Anyone on WebEx?
There is no one
on WebX.
Okay, I'll leave P seventy two one consent.
Mr. Chair, can we please take up um item P seventy five? I know it's listed as regular, but staff has no um issues with placing it on consent as there has not been any um uh objection to P seventy five.
Okay. Is there anyone here to speak in opposition to P seventy five?
Miss Elmore was signed up but she is no longer here.
Okay. Anyone on WebEx?
There's no one on WebEx.
Okay. So if it's appropriate to leave it on put it on consent, we'll put it on consent.
Uh would you like to have the publication for that one? So that was Tampa Bay Times June seventh, twenty twenty three, and it was continued from the August eighth BCC meeting.
Okay. So
Um on P seventy five. I don't have any objection to you m moving into consent, but I'd like a motion for you to do that in addition. I think it's missing the live standard live local art condition. So
yes, we're gonna ask that that be placed on
on there. If you do make a motion to move a consent to consent, please add it. With the requirement that they add the live local lack condition.
Do we want you to give the applicant to agree agree to it ahead of time as well?
The applicant has verbally told Denise and I that they're okay with it. Okay. But if you want them to get up and state that, I'm happy to.
As long as you have it on the record and they're okay with it? Mr. Hobby's
giving us the thumbs up. Mr. Hobby's signaling, let the record reflect that Mr. Hobby give a thumbs up. And I'll
make the motion with the live local language in it.
So I'm gonna read P seventy five. Is that okay? Sure. I don't think we've gotten to it yet. PDD 237703. I'm sorry. PDD 237590 Mitchell Ranch East Mixed Use MPUD Master Plan Unit, Mitchell Ranch Partnership Limited, and Brisole Limited. It's a rezoning from C2 General Commercial District, AC Agricultural District, to an MPUD Master Plan Unit development to allow the development of a maximum of 322,000 square feet of commercial retail, 100,000 square feet of medical office. 260
senior apartment units and 400 multifamily units and associated infrastructure on approximately 192.66 acres. Again, we're asking that you approve it with conditions and add the condition regarding the Live Local Act. Again, comes to your recommendation of approval with conditions from the Planning and Development Department and the Planning Commission.
Okay, so I have a motion to add this to the consent agenda.
Yes, sir. And then Chair Chairman Mariano just a comment on this. It's it's good to see An opportunity for For senior living. We don't see that often enough, I think, on our agenda. So Just add that to my
And your motion your motion includes.
Yes, and my motion includes ac accept it with the Live Local Act conditions that County Attorney referenced. Okay.
Second. Second.
Okay. District one, Commissioner Oakley. District two, Commissioner Weightman. District three, Commissioner Starkey. I but I but I
actually have a quest I have a question. Can we Just looking at the map and Clark wasn't the trail gonna go behind the ponds? But looking at the map it's n maybe I have it wrong.
It's on there.
Okay, now I see you. I'm good. Aye.
Okay, thank you. District four, Commissioner Bradford.
Aye.
District five, Chairman Mariano.
Aye. Okay. Now do we have a motion to approve the consent agenda? So move? Okay.
Second. District One, Commissioner Oakley. District two, Commissioner Weightman. District three, Commissioner Starkey. Aye. District four, Commissioner Bradford. Aye. District five Chairman Mariano.
Aye.
Thank you.