Continued P10 PDD-27-455 Dana Family Trust tattoo parlor
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, Jan 9, 2020
The published PDF. Its text could not be extracted — it is an image-only scan — so nothing in it is searchable here, but it reads normally.
The county’s minutes for Planning Commission, Jan 9, 2020
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
Machine transcription of 2m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 100% of 13 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Also I'd like you to uh bring your attention to item P ten. On that item is PDD twenty seven four five five. Under the name Dana Family Trust from Home Occupation for Tattoo Parlor in an ER, a state residential district. On that item it is a policy that when an item uh becomes contentious, when we get letters of objection on an item, that the item be continued to the site of the county it's closest to. So in this uh regard we are requesting
that the item be continued to the January 23rd Planning Commission meeting at 130. In New Port Richey. There have also been several ex parte communications from folks in opposition to the Planning Commission members, and I just wanted to read those into the record as well. Those have been provided to the clerk's office and we will include those in the packet moving forward on the 23rd. So the request on that one is to continue to
the January 23rd, 2020 Planning Commission meeting at 130 in Newport Ritchie.
Okay, so we have requests to continue. Uh I have a motion.
I have a motion to continue the January twenty-third.
I'll make the motion.
So we have a motion. Do we have a second? All in favor? Okay.
Opposed? Okay. Didn't you want them to receive and file the ex parte communications today or
um I I provided the ex parte communications to the clerk's office through email. They have all gone to the Planning Commission members.
Probably just an abundance caution do a motion to receive and file the exported communications as well. Okay.
So do I have a motion to receive and file the ex parte communications on this particular
I'll make the
motion. A second. Do we have a motion and a second? Any further discussion of the motion? All in favor? Posed? Okay.