P9 master roadway plan and stewardship ordinance
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, Jan 9, 2020
The published PDF. Its text could not be extracted — it is an image-only scan — so nothing in it is searchable here, but it reads normally.
The county’s minutes for Planning Commission, Jan 9, 2020
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
Machine transcription of 1m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 100% of 8 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
And then if you
can get a motion on P nine. Okay, now we're gonna hit to P nine. If you remember the last part of Pat's presentation, he spoke specifically about the master roadway plan changes and the stewardship ordinance. Those are the two booklets in there that actually comprises the revisions, the proposed revisions to the land development code.
So we need that in the motion.
Well I'd like to just I probably don't know. You could just make a motion to approve P
nine. With the understanding there's a few issues that we're still working out that need to be worked out between now and the board meeting.
Yeah, it's fine, I don't need to go through the same yeah.
Yes. Thank you. I make a motion that we approve P9 and uh pending additional material moving forward.
We have a motion. Do we have a second? I'll second. Okay. All in favor? Opposed? Okay, Mr. Carrie.