Staff reports media, email, waste energy, 7051 petition
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Feb 22, 2022
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Feb 22, 2022
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
Machine transcription of 11m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 61% of 62 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Yeah, just a couple things. If you recall back a few weeks ago we did the media availability out on Ridge Road. I think three three of y'all were there for that. Um just a couple of facts about that there was about seventeen million views of that from various sources.
What? Did you say 17 million?
Yeah, in in the publicity value that's a little over a million a million dollars of publicity from that. So thank you for being out there and helping with that and thanks to the media communications team, Sam and Everybody that worked on that, that's uh that was a pretty big deal. Um second thing is um We are migrating over to to Office three sixty five. That's on the cloud, so email And the office suite will be on the cloud so you will start seeing that in in March and April. That does infect you 'cause that does infect your county
email. So Just heads up, uh that's coming, that's Should make things more efficient on our end, easier to share files and and some other things at least internally to the work we do. So just wanted to give you a heads up on that. And that's all I have.
Okay, who's next?
Oh unless the Commission
Mariano. Just a question. I thought maybe we get an update on the waste energy plant bill that was going today.
I think it passed committee twenty two to one, twenty one.
No that's a that's a global one, right? That was a global one. Yeah.
Yeah. Re Representative Mari Mariano's was working on it. So I know Mike Carbella's up there today.
Yeah, we got a wonder we got a wonderful screen grab of Mike presenting today. We will be using it for many memes for many years.
Mm-hmm.
You have to share.
That's where we are.
Okay. I'm I I don't know what's going on with that. What's going on with that? I don't remember. The w the waste energy. Well.
That was a s uh i I I'm uh I'll try to summarize that Mike's not here. He's I think he's probably on his way back from Tallahassee. But that was uh the bill that the Senate President put together that would create a funding pool for the waste energy plant when the power current power agreements run out to help supplement the the drop in in revenue that those waste the intent there is Burning trash is good. a policy that the state of Florida
wants to encourage as opposed to putting it in the b in the ground. And so that's that's the intent behind that.
Thank you. Does that have to do with using the waste abase as well when we wrote that?
No ma'am. This is strictly a funding source, a financial piece to help offset the power the loss of revenue when the power contracts run out in a couple of years. Oh
okay. I remember that.
Thank
you.
All right, uh County Attorney.
Um Madam Chairman, members of the board. Um we were served with a 7051 petition by stock development on parcel S nineteen that is the Environmental Dispute Resolution Act. Um
I think m I think most well, maybe not. It's been a while since we've we've had one. Um it it is a it's a process that the that someone who believes that they are inordinately burdened by the action of the Board of County Commissioners in land development can take. Um there's a special magistrate that is agreed to by the parties. Um in this case we have uh we proposed list And we've
agreed on an attorney out of Tampa by the name of David McCannick. Um he is AI C P and a Supreme Court um certified mediator. Um and that process will Go. through the process and you know, there there that's a statutory process that um we have to go through um and then there is a public
participation, for lack of a better term, mediation. So the public is in unlike a court mediation. the public is invited to attend, especially those who are affected. the negotiation, if any, between the applicant and the county um to see if some resolution of the of the decision can be made. if such a resolution were to occur Not saying that
it would. then that would come forward to the board. um in another public hearing So to vote on whatever the the settlement would be.
So um does that take place here, that public thing or in Tampa or where?
It would it would take place some on one of your facilities here. Either either the I think a lot of times depending on the amount of public Um we've either used the board chambers I think when A one concrete because there wasn't a lot of pa Uh there wasn't a lot of public w that's the last one that comes to mind.
Yeah, that's the concrete plan on fit on fifty four. Um that was done in your in your conference room because there wasn't a lot of public. Um so we find some place that that would
work for for the amount of people that are going to attend. Um And so uh
Why is it called an environmental?
that's what the statute's name is. It so I assume that it was called environmental land use dispute resolution is because it could also be used for environmental permit denials by DEP. Swift mud, that sort of thing. They all they would also Um
Um statute. Uh the other thing I wanted to Madam Chair? Yeah. Just So which item is that specifically? Seven
Oakes.
S19 was the Seven Oaks multi-taunt family. I don't know if the public picked up on it, but want to be sure we know. Um
Going rolling back to this morning's discussion by Mr. Schumate, um because I picked up some discussion amongst the board about um
You went with staff's recommendation, but you also said you wish to evaluate
Taking further steps. And I just wanna remind the board that if Senate bill two uh six twenty and House Bill five sixty nine pass, which are the ones that say that if you impact a business by more than fifteen percent. You may not be able to t to revisit that issue. after July first. your policy decision, not trying to influence the policy decision, but I do want to make you aware
that That policy decision may be taken away from you after July first. So if the board wishes to ban the retail sale of rabbits, it probably should be done before July first, not pushing you in that direction. But I don't want it to be the fall and the board says We want to do this and I have to come back and say, Well the legislature says you can't now. So that that should be something you
weigh in your discussions about bring when this ordinance comes forward if
different opinions that I heard. in on the board and I'm not sure where the majority was. And that's all I have For today. Thank you.
Oh do we need to discuss that? Do we need to discuss the bunnies?
I I believe what Mike was recommending was still a change to the current ordinance. So I mean That would come back and you would have time to make adjustments then if you wanted to.
Right.
So I mean there is a chance Your his recommendation which you approved. was to make changes to the current ordinance. It just not going all the way. Right? It was
but if we went all the way we wouldn't we'd have to pay that.
Only if it was after July first. So my recommendation would be that when Mr. Schumate brings that back As introduction. with the ordinance put together, if that's the time the board needs to say, no, we want to go forward, advertise it for the full ban or we're comfortable with going this far right now.
And go. Well I would just be on the record that if you heard them say eighty percent of these pets Don't make it a year. I'm okay with the ban. And that way if you're really serious about wanting a rabbit for a pet, you can get it from a breeder. And spend a little more time. Oh
we just request as is County Attorney mentioned we can have this discussion at the introduction when Micah's here I mean he's our expert.
Yeah, I just wanted the board to think about
that
as it goes forward.
Okay. That would be a publicly noticed item on the agenda. So you would have the chance to have that discussion then.
Okay. Um Clark. Yes. Oh yes. Um thank you, Madam Chair. I wanted to tell some good news. Uh my office submitted the annual comprehensive planancial report for the year that ended 2021 with the governor uh the government finance officers association of the United States and Canada and Pasco County has won the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Report. Yeah. And this marks the 38th year, consecutive
year of getting that award. So congratulations. The first award was 1983. So that's good. The other thing I wanted to say was a couple of months ago, uh Brian Corley, our supervisor for elections, sent out a challenge to the county and the constitutional officers. Oh, thanks. And um it was a kickball challenge and that happened on Sunday. And I just want to show you what you missed out on. We weren't invited. You were you
were invited. You just didn't answer it, I don't think. Well that's what Brian Brian says. Yeah, I'm gonna look. Public public information requests. One the trophy. It is an awesome trophy and it's um made to be like the Stanley Cup, so we get to keep it for a year and then we bring it back next year. So I hope you guys are there so we can really win. Yeah.
That s some of those teams had ringers on their team. Someone had a P E coach or what what else? Who who had who put some ringers on their team? Was that you guys?
No, no. No, no, no. I I don't want to even get into that conversation. It is taped. But no no
ringers on our team. Well congratulations.
Thank you.