Record corrections about ex parte and sworn testimony
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, Apr 17, 2025
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Planning Commission, Apr 17, 2025
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
Machine transcription of 1m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 88% of 8 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Mr. Chair, before we move to item PC 9 and PC 10, I would like to state for the record that Tim Lowe was sworn in previously in the meeting. And additionally for items APC 12 and APC 13, it was stated on record that there were ex partees received. Um I misstated that they were conflict of interest forms, not ex parte.
Yeah, and I confirmed about Mr. Lowe's testimony too, so.
Okay. I think that does it. Any any other motions?
We've still got none more.
Just go ahead and make the motions.
Technically they're technically you they're public items that you could hear from the public. Oh yes yes, sir. If you want to wait staff if you want to wait staff presentation, if I must go ahead. But you have to have a minimum ask for public comment. Okay.
Do you want to hear from Seth? Yes. Okay. Yes, of course. Okay.
Instead of fighting fire,