P-66 Two Rivers MPUD substantial modification
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.
What was said
Machine transcription of 1m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 100% of 9 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Okay. Public hearings? Uh first one is P sixty six.
We approved the publication uh I think at this time do you want to
the county county attorney is going to change procedures from here on in? That he's not gonna do that readoff of all the We don't have
to do that. Yeah. It's a change in the format of the meeting because we don't have to read that out. But we will get the proof one by one?
One by one. We have proof publication on 66, uh April 22nd, 2026, edition of the Tampa Bay Times, supplemented by an affidavit affidavit of certified mailings and site process.
Item P sixty six is PD twenty six seven eight five six. This is a zoning amendment for EPG Two Rivers Development LLC et al. Two Rivers MPUD Master Plan Unit Development Substantial Modification, which is a substantial modification to the Two Rivers MPUD, Master Plan Unit Development. This is a request to continue the item to the September 9, 2026 meeting at 1:30 PM or as soon thereafter as they may be heard in date 6.
Okay.
Some some moved.
Motion is second. All in favor say aye. Aye. P sixty seven, we have proof.