Parks Capital Maintenance MSTU millage rate
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Sep 16, 2025
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Sep 16, 2025
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
Machine transcription of 1m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 100% of 5 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
I will now provide a summary of the other two municipal service taxing unit budgets stating the millage rates, the percentage change from the rollback rate, and the reasons for the change. No millage was levied last year. No mills were adopted during the first public hearing for the Parks Capital Maintenance MSTU fund. I would ask the board to accept public comment and then vote on the Parks Capital Maintenance MSTU millage rate. Since this millage rate is unable to increase at this final public hearing,
Does anyone wish to speak to the board regarding the parks, capital maintenance, maintenance, MST, UF Zero? Yeah.
Not easy. I had to say that. Sorry. Of zero point zero zero zero. zero. Um okay.
All in favor? Aye.
Should say nay. Okay.