Consent agenda public hearing items
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Aug 19, 2020
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Aug 19, 2020
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Aug 19, 2020
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Aug 19, 2020
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
Machine transcription of 5m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 94% of 34 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Excellent. Thank you, Ms. Hernandez. I need a motion to continue. So move. Motion. Second. Second. All in favor? Aye. Aye. All opposed? Same sign. Motion passes. Now we have six public hearing items on the consent agenda. These items will be approved with one vote, without a presentation, unless there is someone hearing an objection. Um those that have pre registered at or at Or at the public comment can kiosk to speak. To any of the items on the public hearing agenda prior to speaking will be sworn in by the clerk. Uh Mr. Clerk, why don't we go ahead and just
um swear everybody in at once? We go through that process now for each and every item.
Um again I believe we have one person at the kiosk and No an uh one online. Yeah. So if those people can um Stand and raise your right hand and the clerk will swear you in. Do you swear or affirm the testimony you will give in in this matter uh is the truth, so help you God. Confidently also that
idea.
Okay,
so with that, um let's go on to item P four. Do we have proof? We have proof of publication in the Tampa Bay Times July twenty ninth of this year.
PDD twenty cu thirty four conditional use wiregrass S P E L L C for the sale of alcoholic beverages, beer, wine, liquor, package sales and on-premises consumption in conjunction with the operation. Of a shopping center and a master planning development district comes to you with a recommendation of approval with conditions from the Planning and Development Department and the Planning Commission.
Thank you. Do we have anybody signed up to speak in opposition to this item? via WebEx, the kiosk, or does anybody send an email? in opposition.
Dobra, jaki jest.
And
no on WebEx or email. Leave on consent, item P five. Published in the Tampa Bay Times July twenty ninth of this year.
PDD 27490 zoning amendment in the name of Drene Diane Worthheimer for change in zoning from AC Agricultural District to an AR5 Agricultural Residential District comes to you with a recommendation of approval from the Planning and Development Department and the Planning Commission.
Thank you. Do we have anybody signed up to speak in opposition to this item via WebEx, the
kiosk, or via email? Not by WebEx nor by email. Seeing none.
Nobody at the kiosk.
Thank you. Seeing none, we will leave one consent.
Uh we have proof of publication of this matter in the Tampa Bay Times July twenty-ninth of this year.
PDD 207491 zoning amendment Pishon Associates LLC for a change in zoning from a master plan unit development district to a C One neighborhood commercial district comes to you with a recommendation of approval from the Planning and Development Department and the Planning Commission.
Thank you. Do anybody sign up via WebEx to speak or at the kiosk or did they send anybody send an email in opposition? Not at this time for either, sir. See now we'll leave on cons
we'll leave on consent. Thank you. P seven. We have again proof of publication in the July twenty ninth edition of the Tampa Bay Times.
PDD 207492 zoning amendment Dwight and Joyce Hopkins, Trustee of the Joyce Hopkins Revocable Trust for a change in zoning from AC Agricultural District to AR Agricultural Residential District comes to you with a recommendation of approval from the Planning and Development Department and the Planning Commission.
Excellent. Anybody signed up via WebEx or at the kiosk or to send an email in opposition to the signal. No sir, neither the
WebEx nor email.
Nobody at the kiosk.
Thank you. Lee on consent. P eight, we do need to pull.
We do have proof of publication in the July twenty ninth edition of the Tampa Bay Time. We're going to pull P eight because we do have somebody uh signed up to speak in opposition to that item, so we'll move on to P nine. And we have proof of publication on this matter July fifteenth. uh in the Tampa Bay Times of this year.
P9 is PDD 2006553. It's an amended and restated development agreement for Wiregrass Ranch Development Regional Impact. It's an amended and restated DA between Locust Branch, LLC, and Pasco County to identify modifications to the required transportation mitigation, land use, and related conditions of development. Comes here with a recommendation of approval.
Thank you. Anyone signed up to speak opposition to this item via WebEx? or at the kiosk or anybody send an email.
Neither the WebEx nor
email.
Okay, nobody at the
PR. Leave on consent. That does it for those consent items minus P eight, which was pulled. If I can have a
Move approval. Second. Second.
I have a motion and a second. All in favor? Aye. All opposed? Same sign. Motion passes. Back to P eight, Ms. Hernandez.