P55 R Property Shady Hills C2 rezoning
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.
The source document
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Jun 16, 2026
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
Machine transcription of 5m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 91% of 35 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Yeah. Uh, Mr. Chairman, there your procedures are there are two rezoning agendas, regular and consent. Staff will present each application to the Board of County Commissioners. If staff or planning commission has recommended approval and there is no opposition, the application will be considered by the board without further presentation. If staff or planning commission has recommended denial, or if there is opposition to the application, the applicant will be given. five minutes for presentation, the opposition will be given three minutes for each individual or five minutes
for a group representative, and the applicant will be given three minutes for rebuttal. Any individual disagreeing with staff or planning commission recommendation, or anyone wishing to object to any condition of the rezoning may at this time request that the petition be pulled from the consent agenda, in which case that application will be heard under the regular agenda later on during the meeting. Otherwise, all rezoning applications on the consent agenda will be approved by a single motion and vote. If you wish to speak to any petition, please
give your name and address and whether or not you've been sworn for the record. These are quasi-judicial public hearings. The law in Florida is that your public support or opposition of an application is insufficient for this board to take action. Please limit your comments to those criteria found within the board's land development code. Madam Clerk, would you like to swear the public in?
Thank you, Mr. County Attorney. If you're here to speak to the remaining items on the agenda, please write please stand. Raise your right hands.
Do you swear or affirm the testimony you're about to give is the truth, so help you God. Thank you.
Okay. Item P fifty-five. Do you have proof?
Yes. Item P fifty-five was published in the Tampay Times on May 6, 2026, and by affidavit of certified mailings and site postings.
Item P55 is a zoning amendment in the name of R Property Investments LLC, R R Property Shady Hills. It's a change in zoning from an AR agricultural residential district to a C2 General Commercial District located in northwest Pasco County on the east side of Shady Hills Road, approximately 784 feet north of the intersection. Of Shady Hills Road in Flourteen. Floralton, excuse me, drive, containing approximately one acre.
This comes before you with a recommendation to approve.
Okay. Is there anyone here to speak in opposition to this project?
Mr. Chairman I have someone signed up for this item, but I don't see them in the audience. Logan O'Leary? Logan O'Leary. Okay.
Want us to pull from consent? You've only got one consent.
Okay, that's your question.
All right. Can you just show me on the map where it is? Because when I look um when I look on my map here, it's all houses, so I'm just trying to understand where it is.
So uh if you see the aerial imagery here, this is the full parcel. But the little corner that's right there is what's being proposed. The rest is is essentially part of um an easement. So that easement is going to remain as is we've already Who owns that easement? Um it is the gas easement. Uh Florida Gas, I think it is.
Oh, because I see bike trail. Yeah.
And
I see that.
Yeah, right now it's a gas easement, um a natural gas easement. So we did coordinate with them. They went out to the site to ensure that the proposed rezoning and what they're planning to do on this site would not impact the easement itself. Um and they confirmed that it will not. And
you said C two? C two, correct. But um I'm just curious, it's all residential. Um Across well it's kinda messed up. It's yeah,
it's all actually
about enforcement action.
Yeah, it's ROR and C two. So you can see the C two to the north, so it's already a budding C two. And then this entire area is R O R and the actual easement that we were discussing is calm flu. So it's generally the bottom end of that commercial node that's in that area.
And it looks like it goes right to Land from Lancer Rudas probably the connection point's gonna be, so it's actually a good fit.
Yeah. I just uh s whatever's there on COM needs co-enforcement action on it. I don't think that's legal stuff going on. Okay. I feel better.
Sure. Okay. guess my favorite question.
Yes sir. Thank you.
No, it's the it's the contiguous parcels that always concern me whenever we have these smaller add-ons to it. that they could connect them together and then get Get to where You know. Live local becomes vulnerable so if you condition a piece of it, maybe it discourages any opportunity. That's
my thought
process.
Voluntary deed restriction has been assessed.
Uh anyone here from the audience to speak against item P fifty five. Anyone online?
No one's online.
All right. To the board. Uh move approval consent agenda.
Second.