P61 and P62 consent agenda P62 continuance
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.
What was said
Machine transcription of 2m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 86% of 14 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
sixty one and P sixty two. Item P sixty one was published in the Tampe Times on March ninth, twenty twenty two.
P61 is PDD 220261. This is the transmittal hearing, so we're asking that you authorize, take public comment, and authorize transmittal to the Department of Economic Opportunity and other reviewing agencies. It's a comprehensive plan amendment, C PAL 2104, Chapter 7, transportation element. And um This is a transmittal of the transportation element, Table 7-2A, Corridor Preservation, repealing table seven-two B, providing for map amendments, the Highway Vision Plan and
Functional Classification Map, Map 7-36, and the Transportation Corridor Preservation Map, Map 7-35, and providing for additional text amendments as necessary for internal consistency. This went to the local planning agency on Um November fourth, twenty-one, uh we found it consistent with the comprehensive plan and recommended um approval to the Board of County Commissioners.
Uh would anyone
option I'm sorry is uh scheduled for May 3rd at 130 in Dade City.
Okay. would um anyone like to address this item? Seeing no one anyone online wish to address this? I have nobody online for this. No one's signed up. Okay, so we'll keep it on consent.
P sixty-two. Item P62 was published in the Tampay Times on February 2nd, 2022. Madam Chair,
Commissioner Oakley's item P62 is PDD 220068. This was supposed to be the transmittal hearing for this item, but the applicant has requested a continuance to the April 19th, 2022 Board of County Commissioners meeting at 130 in Newport Ritchie.
Okay, is there anyone who wishes to speak to this item? Anyone online for this? No one online and no one
signed up.
I would since this was a that 62 needs to be pulled off of consent because you need a separate motion to continue to continue it. So I would suggest a motion on 61 as a consent item first and then go on to 62. With approved
move to approve the consent agenda.
Second. All in favor? Aye. Opposed. All right, uh P sixty-two. I'll take a motion to continue. Motion to continue. Second. All in favor? I opposed. And
that would be at the date and time that Ms. Hernandez has previously indicated.