consent agenda PC1 PC2 PC3 PC4 approve
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
This archive found it in the recording: a call to order, a recess, or business the board never listed. The county recorded nothing about it, so everything below is our reading.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, Jun 18, 2020
The published PDF. Its text could not be extracted, because it is an image-only scan, so nothing in it is searchable here. It still reads normally.
The county’s minutes for Planning Commission, Jun 18, 2020
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
Machine transcription of 5m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 86% of 35 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Today we have uh public hearing. A war public hearing. Hearing items on the consent agenda. These will be approved by roll call vote unless Uh the Adam is pulled ins and from consent. Once a motion is made on the consent agenda that we see Member will uh who makes the motion state their name. And the For a funny question member who Seconds it will also state their name and then we'll have a roll call.
All right, so if all that's clear. Guess we could start on the first one, Denise.
Yep, ready. So I both on items PC one and PC two, you're sitting as a local planning agency on those items. Item PC one is PDD 200593 in the name of Bexley South. Development agreement. It's an agreement between Pasco County and NNP Bexley LLC in connection with the construction of the existing of the extension of turn lanes on State Road 54 at Suncoast Parkway. On this item, we ask that you find it
consistent with a comprehensive plan and recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners.
All right. Is there anybody here to speak on that?
The applicant is physically present.
Uh but no one else. So uh Right, net. So that will remain on consent. Um Number two, B C two.
DC2 is PDD 200605, a development agreement in the name of Causeway Commercial Center, MPUD Master Plan Unit Development. It's a development agreement amendment between Pasco County and Hagman Groves, Inc. in conjunction in connection with the development of Causeway Commercial Center Master Plan Unit Development. And this comes to you with a recommendation of that you find it consistent with a comprehensive plan and that. Uh, you recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners.
All right. And there's the applicant present.
Yes. Physically present. I mean virtually present, sorry.
And no one here to object.
No.
All right, PC three.
PC3 is PDD 207485. On this item, you're back as the Planning Commission, not the local planning agency. This is a zoning amendment in the name of Pasco County Facilities Management, Duke Energy Florida LLC. This is a change in zoning from MPUD Master Planning Unit Development District to AC Agricultural District. And this comes here with a recommendation of approval.
All right. The applicants present virtually.
Yes.
Okay. No one here to object. No.
Okay. Uh next D C four.
Item PC four is PDD 207486. It's a special exception in the name of Pasco County Facilities Management, Duke Energy Florida LLC. This is a companion item to item PC three. So it's being run concurrently, but if it's approved today, it will not take effect until such time as the board adopts PC three. It's a special exception for an electrical substation laydown yard. Andor storage areas in an AC agricultural district comes to you with a recommendation of approval with conditions
as contained in your your agenda packet.
All right, and the applicants are actually present.
Yeah. Firm.
Uh anyone in here there object?
No.
Okay, any comments from the uh board?
Not uh May I'll hear a motion to approve the consent agenda item items to submit it.
Mr. Chairman, I'll make a motion to approve PC one, PC two, PC three, and PC four.
Okay, we have a motion. Do we have a second? Second Michael Cox. Okay. Seconded by Mike Cox. Any further discussion on the motion? All in favor of the motion signified by a roll call vote.
Amy Kamarty. Bye. Michael Cox?
Aye.
Peter Hansel.
Christopher Paul.
Bye.
Sharon Charles Gray.
Hi.