P58 Saddlebrook Resort PD comp plan amendment
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Oct 24, 2023
The published PDF. Its text could not be extracted — it is an image-only scan — so nothing in it is searchable here, but it reads normally.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Oct 24, 2023
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
Machine transcription of 3m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 97% of 29 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
P fifty eight was advertised in the Tampa Bay Times October fourth, twenty twenty three, and by affidavit certified mailings and site postings.
Item P58 is in ordinance amending the Pasco County Comprehensive Plan, providing for a large-scale comprehensive plan amendment to the future land use map map 2-15 and Sheet 22 from Res 6 residential 6-dwelling units per gross acre to PD plan development on approximately 420.37 acres of real property located to the south. Of State Road 54 and east of Service Road, and a text amendment creating sub-area policy flu 7.166, Saddlebrook Resort PD, and a map amendment to the future land
use map two-nine, adding sub-area map two-nine sixty six. Saddlebrook Resort P D, and providing for additional text amendments as necessary for internal consistency, providing for repealer serverability in an effective date, and this comes with a recommendation to the resolution. Uh approve the company the proposed company and supply amendment and adopt the ordinance by roll call vote. Okay.
Uh we have anyone sign up for the
No sir. No one has signed up for this item.
No one signed up. Does anyone in the audience wish to speak to this item? So you know one.
I may. Barbara Will Hight, 6327 Grand Boulevard, Newport Ritchie. As you can imagine, this is a big deal for my client who is spending already spending millions and millions and millions um bringing forth the vision that they had told you about. So out of an abundance of caution, I want to put a couple things in the record, exactly that were in the record before. The our PowerPoint as presented, it still has same date on it and the needs assessment, transportation needs assessment.
Move
to
receive and file.
And if you could also just incorporate all of the previous record materials from 1523 to 723, 4423, and 71123.
May you second.
Second.
Got a motion and second to receive and file. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. Motion back.
And I I just want to apologize to everyone. Oh, do
we have to roll call though?
Do we do you need a roll call for that, Jeff? Oh yeah.
Did we take
public comment? You you did. Yeah,
I did. Okay, that was Barbara.
Oh, okay. District one, Commissioner Oakley. District two, Commissioner Weightman. District three, Commissioner Starkey. Aye. District four, Commissioner Bradford.
District five Chairman Mariano.
Okay. Motion passed four zero. Okay.
So
now we got a you need an approval. Need an approval of this. Move to approve P58. Second. And I got a motion and second by roll call vote.
District One, Commissioner Oakley. Aye. District two, Commissioner Weightman. District three, Commissioner Starkey. Aye. District four, Commissioner Bradford.
Five.
District five, Chairman Mariano.
Motion passed 4-0. Move on to P59.