P46 Circle K US 52 Prospect MPUD rezoning
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Apr 23, 2024
The published PDF. Its text could not be extracted — it is an image-only scan — so nothing in it is searchable here, but it reads normally.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Apr 23, 2024
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
Machine transcription of 1m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 100% of 7 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Move on to P forty six.
P forty six was advertised in the Tampa Bay Times February twenty-first, twenty twenty-four, and was continued from the April tenth meeting to today.
Okay. This item is a consent item. Go ahead.
It is. P forty-six PEG 247718. It's a zoning amendment, Circle K and U S R 52 and Prospect MPUD. Stream Fruit LLC is for a rezoning from an AR agricultural residential district to an MPUD Master Plan Unit Development to allow for 11,330 square feet of non-residential entitlements on approximately three. Comes to you with a recommendation of approval with conditions as included in your agenda packet from the Pasadena Hills Planning and Policy Committee. um and the
Planning and Economic Growth Department. There is a specific condition of approval which is number forty four that addresses the Live Local Act.
Okay. Uh This is a public hearing. Is there anyone here to speak against this item?
And there's no one signed up and no one on the right-of-way.