R30 tree mitigation fund cap and heritage trees
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.
What was said
Machine transcription of 3m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 88% of 32 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
No, that's too expensive. We can't afford that.
It may help you. Okay. All right. All right, we're gonna go back to where we're on P thirty four.
XP thirty four, pleasure of the board.
Uh you mean R thirty. I'm sorry,
R thirty. Sorry.
So is staff recommending uh ten thousand cap or no cap? I'm not good.
So previously we were directed to do no cap back in January and then we got comments from stakeholders that ten thousand would be more appropriate. So it's at the board's discretion if ten thousand is the desired amount. But you can make that
twelve thousand. Ten thousand? But I I think we need a cap.
Well like Chad.
I do have a question. Um Commissioner Weightman mentioned uh heritage trees and basically having that be counted separately. Um would that ten thousand include that or would it just be a flat ten thousand per upland developable acre?
Looks like there's three votes for a cap. Yeah,
but what do we want to think about the heritage?
They need to be over and above because the the mission here is to save those.
That's what I thought that was.
Yeah, that's what the mission is.
Okay.
Save the heritage trees.
And we have a definition for heritage trees. They are We do.
So the motion is with the capitan with the heritage trees trees. Outside of it,
yeah.
Okay. So we got a motion, we have a second, roll call hold.
This one can be straight up.
Are
we clear?
All in favor? Are we clear on that? Aye. Okay. Any opposed? Aye. Right, so four to one.
Who was the night?
I said I said I reluctant. Were you slow on your slow? Five oh vote. I was reluctant. Five oh vote. But good thing. I'm grateful I'm grateful that we're moving forward forward in the right direction.
Um did we did we do any escalator Wait, guys. Didn't we want to tie this so that we don't that there's a every so often it increases so we don't
let's move on. I see how
it works.
Um Chair, if I may, real quick though, um David Allen, um since this is a resolution, if there is a desire to increase fees, we can do that relatively quickly with resolutions.
Okay. And we included that language in section eight oh two as well that we would review it on a three year basis, not necessarily change it every three years, but that we could look at it on a periodic basis.