Skip to main content
Pasco Countymeeting record
Not on the published agendaStaff reportInferred

Cybersecurity and lobbyist selection reminders

What the county recorded

This item is not from the published agenda

It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.

The source document

Published agenda

The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Sep 17, 2024

The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.

Approved minutes

The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Sep 17, 2024

The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.

What was said

Transcript

Machine transcription of 7m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 50% of 34 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.

Read it in the meeting →
OakleyChair

good. All right. Uh Mr. Kabala.

Mike Carballa

Just real quick, sir. You as as you're all aware, we take cybersecurity very seriously here at Pasco County, uh doing a lot of a lot of training and a lot of good things. And I always remind our new hires that we as individual users are sort of the weak link in that. We we don't want our government uh system here to be taken down. It would grind a lot of things to a halt. Uh so I'm really pleased to announce that our own Chief Information Officer and IT Director Todd Bailey was awarded a national level award by the Public Sector Cybersecurity Summit for

being an outstanding collaborator and partnership with those agencies in advancing cybersecurity awareness. Just know that your IT team is certainly parrying uh cyber attacks on a daily basis. It really amazes me. Just how many entities are really trying to break in and take down our data, uh, among other things. So we're very, very proud of Todd and the leadership that he provides to our information technology team to continue to keep things cutting edge. So well done, Todd. That's all, sir.

OakleyChair

Very good job. Mr. Steinsteiner. I do have stuff today.

Unidentified speakerVoice A

Um this is a reminder you should have received from your purchasing department. Um the RSQ for the state lobbyist and the federal lobbyist. Um They you are acting as the selection committee yourselves rather than having an administrative um selection committee and by taking that role. You

cannot have contact with any of the proposers once the proposal goes on the street. So you can't have Um so Those firms who are soliciting that business can't contact you, you're in the co sort of cone of silence. Um you can't have any contact with them until after a selection is made and um And if they and if Any of them do try and set up meetings

through your Through your staffs. uh refer them back to the purchasing director. She can handle any of their questions about the solicitation and the terms.

OakleyChair

You

Unidentified speakerVoice A

so you can't have any contact with them? You can't have any contact with them about the proposal.

OakleyChair

About the proposal. It's not about the proposal. Right. Right. Yeah. Okay.

Unidentified speakerVoice A

And if they Try and slip it in, that will disqualify them. When did that go out? And what is it close?

Mike Carballa

Like how long are we talking?

Unidentified speakerVoice A

Okay.

Mike Carballa

Mr. Breitenbach will that up.

Unidentified speakerVoice A

Well, Ralph's back there too.

Mike Carballa

Oh,

OakleyChair

he

Unidentified speakerVoice A

woke

OakleyChair

him up. Yeah.

Mike Carballa

I'm sure I wrote it down after the right-of-way.

OakleyChair

I thought you'd already left. He's flying out.

Dade City

Okay, the federal went out at the end of last month, the s uh state went out the week after. Uh the evaluation date that you'll uh review both federal and state is October twenty-third. And then you will do interviews. And have presentations on November first. So Currently.

Unidentified speakerVoice A

Currently it's on the street. So currently you shouldn't be have you shouldn't be having a

Mariano

contact. Right. When when did we get this? I saw it but I it's uh popped up I don't see it right now. Did I come out today?

Unidentified speakerVoice A

It came out yes I think that your dates the dates that you're gonna have the meetings were put on your calendars yesterday or the day before?

Dade City

So the uh the uh Carrie sent those out today, but we had a hold. I got over your staff earlier a couple of weeks ago, and we had the hold on those dates. So they are officially now on your calendar as of today. So October twenty third and November first. You're looking at all day. For each other's. Thanks.

Unidentified speakerVoice A

Um and the second second item is just briefly in this morning's public comment, uh one of the speakers indicated that you were required to have after five o'clock hearings by state statute. Um that's a misinterpretation of the statute. Um statute that only that only applies to County initiated rezoning And

your reason and and the changes to the land development code But even in those instances there is a provision that says That the Board of County that at least one of those two hearings can be held after what at least one of those hearings shall be held after five PM on a weekday unless the Board unless the Board of County Commissioners by majority plus one vote, elects to conduct the hearing at another time of day. You

ha some time ago Pas uh adopted by motion. uh the that you wanted to have those hearings during your afternoon business with the with the rest of the public hearing. Um

Even And even saying that section, the section that the normal bit the most of the business that you do Um which is applicant rezoning doesn't come under that provision at all, which is why you only have one hearing. You'd have you've y an applicant rezoning would have to have i it if this applied would have to have two public hearing and it doesn't. So I I don't And

in fact, there has been no case that we have lost on that issue.

StarkeyVice Chair

What was what case was she even talking about?

Unidentified speakerVoice A

I th I believe it's it the case that she was referring to was the summary judgment in coastline, uh, which we did the litigation assessment meeting two meetings ago, I guess. Um, which the same statute was referenced, but what the court found was that we hadn't advertised it in the right section of the paper. Not that it was it was a hearing that was required to be after five o'clock. Um

so I wanted to Yeah. Straighten the record out. Thank you. And that's all I have. Thank you. All right.