PDE250144 River Stone Renner development agreement continuance
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Jul 15, 2025
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Jul 15, 2025
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
Machine transcription of 3m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 71% of 31 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
75. We have proof of publication in the March nineteenth, 2025 edition of the Tampa Bay Times, where it was continued at a May 6th 2025 board meeting to May 20th, where it was continued to June 17th, uh 2025, where it was continued to today.
Item P75 is PDE 250144. This is the development agreement in the name of River Stone, formerly known as Renner M PUD. That was the name of the development agreement. This is a request to continue the item to the August 5, 2025, Board of County Commissioners meeting at 1:30 p.m. in Dade City, though the memo says August 19. The request is made by the applicant with PDE support since this is a project in the middle of
the county and is not changing anything as it relates to density, intensity, design, land use or anything like that, but is just an amendment to a provision of the development agreement.
So you're asking them to continue it to the city meeting on August fifth.
Correct. Move approval for continuum.
Uh this was ad was this
It was advertised as a continuance. It was advertised for a different date. I I you can see you can see if there's anybody in the in the audience that wishes to speak to this one.
Yeah. Is there anyone here wishing to speak to this one?
Madam Chairman
Mariano
I mean to continue to a different district, um, even though it's advertise for a different date. I mean I don't know if we want to
Well we're here in Dade City so we didn't have an issue of the right-of-way. So somebody
thinks it's gonna come up for the nineteenth and now they show up on the nineteenth instead of the fifth. You've caused confusion.
Well there's that.
County Attorney?
That's completely up to the board. That's
It wouldn't show on August nineteenth. The only way it would show on August nineteen is if you continued it from here to August nineteenth.
But it's advertised continued to August
nineteen. It was shown in today in today's agenda that was published online as August.
Right. So if someone looked at that and they they just thought that okay it's gonna be continued that day 'cause it always is. Now it gets shifted two weeks earlier, someone may miss that date.
I don't believe that was on the agenda per per se, it's on our notes here, but The agenda didn't it shows a continuation request. The
motion on the the motion on the agenda item shows it for the nineteenth. Yeah.
I think we should stick to the nineteenth.
Oh, this is about um their obligations to the road and how many houses have to be completed in time. So
this was a project that was The board was the one that had the issue, not particularly the neighbors. It was if you recall this was the the the sheriff, Mr. Gadd and I'm okay with the fifty.
Okay.
All in favor? Aye. Wait, did I get a second?
Second.
I I and the motion he had so
it's moved to continue to August August fifth at one thirty or soon thereafter is the same maybe here. Correct.
Okay,