Attorney-client meeting Rad Sports litigation
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no outcome, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Feb 21, 2023
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Feb 21, 2023
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
Machine transcription of 2m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 88% of 16 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Well I've met over the years, yeah, I think so.
Yeah, right. make it because it's not really one. Yeah.
I just wondered which side which side would be.
It
didn't look too negative, but so is against the really.
You change anyone that says?
Wow.
It's female name.
How wow. Chairman
Okay, thanks.
Sorry, I'm in your space here.
I probably needed one of those uh before I left to go to break dinner and lunch.
Ain't nothing we're gonna use for seven.
Because we too much value. What's going on down there, so
This should be fairly easy.
The private attorney client meeting to discuss litigation strategy in the case of Radsports, Pasco Wiregrass LLC versus Pasco County, case number 51-2022-CA. Dash zero two ninety two dash C A X W S Florida Circuit Sixth Court Judicials Circuit has concluded.