Skip to main content
Pasco Countymeeting record
Not on the published agendaConsent agendaInferred

PC5 Hope Youth Ranch private school special exception

What the county recorded

This item is not from the published agenda

It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.

The source document

Published agenda

The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, Mar 21, 2024

The published PDF. Its text could not be extracted — it is an image-only scan — so nothing in it is searchable here, but it reads normally.

Approved minutes

The county’s minutes for Planning Commission, Mar 21, 2024

The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.

What was said

Transcript

Machine transcription of 2m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 90% of 21 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.

Read it in the meeting →
Denise

Following item is PC five. It's a special exception. PEG 247767, Hope Youth Ranch, Inc. Hope Youth Ranch is for a special exception for a private school in an R2 low density residential district. On this item, there are several ex parte uh communications with all Planning Commission members that included a transportation analysis. There were phone calls with Mr. Chuck Gray, Mr. Derek Pontlitz, and if anyone else had a phone call, would you please

state it on the record? On this item, there is a modification, and all those communications have been sent to the clerk's office. There's also a modification to condition of approval number one, which adds that the special exception is for a maximum of 60 special needs students. So it clarifies that these are special needs students. And then there is a the addition of condition of approval number two, which is via. Vehicle shall not queue or park on East Road. Those modifications were sent to the

Planning Commission members and they were also sent to the to the clerk's office. So it comes to you with recommendation of conditions of approval with conditions as stated.

Jon Moody

All right. Mr. Chair, would you pull that and vote on it separately? I have a conflict. I'm engineer on the project.

Charles Grey

Okay.

Unidentified speakerVoice A

So it's gonna stay on consent.

Charles Grey

Okay, so did you ask for the public comment yet?

Jaimie Girardi

You can keep it on consent as long as you vote on it separately. Yeah, that's what we're doing. So that I think you have have another item that's gonna require the same thing. So you might want to just handle all your consent items individually to make it easier. Right.

But you still need to ask if there's public here to speak on five.

Charles Grey

Okay, so on PC five, is there is the applicant present? Anyone here to object?

See no one.

Okay. So you

Unidentified speakerVoice A

vote individually.

Charles Grey

So let's vote on this one. Motion to approve.

Jaimie Girardi

Motion is second, further discussion. And that includes the amendments that Mr. Nanders wrote into the record? Yes, sir. Okay. The two additional

Connected City

conditions.

Jaimie Girardi

All

Charles Grey

in favor, signify by saying aye.

Connected City

Aye.

Charles Grey

Opposed, like, signed. Okay.

Connected City

Did did you want to do his roll call or just to prove or he already said it?