Skip to main content
Pasco Countymeeting record
Not on the published agendaPublic hearingInferred

Rezoning consent agenda and procedures

What the county recorded

This item is not from the published agenda

It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.

The source document

Published agenda

The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Jul 14, 2026

The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.

Approved minutes

The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Jul 14, 2026

The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.

What was said

Transcript

Machine transcription of 11m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 93% of 73 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.

Read it in the meeting →
MarianoChair

Aye. Motion passes 5-0. Now we'll proceed to the public hearing. Will the County Attorney please review the procedures for rezoning?

Unidentified speakerVoice A

There are two rezoning agendas, regular and consent. Staff will present each application to the Board of County Commissioners. If staff or planning commission has recommended approval and there is no opposition, the application will be considered by the Board without further presentation. If staff or planning commission has recommended denial, or if there is opposition, To the application. The applicant will be given five minutes for presentation. The opposition will be given three minutes for each individual or five minutes for a group representative. and

the applicant will be given f three minutes for rebuttal. Any individual disagreeing with staff or planning commission recommendation or anyone wishing to object to any condition of rezoning may at this time request that the petition be pulled from the consent agenda, in which case That application will be heard under the regular agenda later on during the meeting. Otherwise, all rezoning applications on the consent agenda will be approved by a single motion and vote. If you wish to speak to any petition, please give your name and address and whether or not

you've been sworn for the record. These are quasi judicial public hearings. The law is that in Florida that mere public support are opposition. of an application is insufficient for this Board to take action, Please limit your comments to those criteria found within the Board's Land Development Code for rezoning. M Madam Clerk, would you like to square in public?

Starkey

Uh yes sir. If anyone is going to speak to the following items, will you please stand and raise your right hand?

Unidentified speakerVoice B

Mm-hmm.

Starkey

Okay. Do you swear affirm the testimony you're about to give? Is it true? So help you, God. Right, thank you.

MarianoChair

Okay. We'll start with item P eighty six from the continuance. We have proof.

Starkey

Yes, P eighty six was advertised in the Tampa Bay Times March twenty-fifth, twenty twenty-six, and by affidavit of certified mailings and site postings.

Amy Heiler

Item P86, PDE 26-7877, is a zoning amendment to substantial modification in the name of Palmetto Ridge MPUD, Palmetto Ridge Cattle Company, LLC, EPG Palmetto Ridge Holding, LLC. It's a rezoning request from an MPUD Master Plan Unit Development District to MPD Master Plan Unit Development District to allow for the development of 2,800 residential dwelling units and 100,000

square feet of commercial uses with associated infrastructure on a project. Approximately 3,536 acres located in north-central Pasco County on the north side of State Road 52, approximately 0.5 miles east of the intersection of State Road 52 and Aaron Cutoff. This comes before you with a rem recommendation to continue the item to August 11th at 1.30 p.m. in Dade City.

MarianoChair

No motion. So moved. Second. All in favor say aye. Aye. Okay.

Starkey

P P eighty seven was advertised in the Tampa Bay Times May twenty-seventh, twenty twenty-six, and by affidavit of certified mailings and site postings.

Amy Heiler

Item P87 is PDE 26-7904. It's a zoning amendment in the name of Raviglio Ranch M Puty, Clearwater Capital Partners USA, LLC. It's a rezoning request from an AR agricultural district to an MPUD Master Plan Unit Development District to allow for the development of 45,000 square feet of an assisted living facility, 5,000 square feet of office, and one single-family detached dwelling

and associated infrastructure within the villages of Pasadena Hills. in village B on approximately 7.66 acres, located on the north side of Prospect Road, approximately one half mile east of Curley Road. This comes before you with a recommendation to approve with conditions.

MarianoChair

Is there anyone in in the audience in opposition to item P eighty seven?

Starkey

Sir there is someone signed up.

MarianoChair

Unless someone signed up, okay. We're gonna pull that from consent. Adam P88.

Starkey

Okay, so P eighty-eight was advertised in the Tampa Bay Times April first, twenty twenty-six and by affidavit of certified mailings and site postings.

Amy Heiler

Item P eighty eight is PDE 25-0193. It's a development agreement in the name of Highland Homes Clayton Properties Group, Inc. to design, permit, and construct portion of Hidden Creek Boulevard in exchange for transportation development free credits in the villages of Pasadena Hills located on Hidden Creek Boulevard, spanning. from the intersection of Hidden Creek Boulevard and Island Boulevard to the northern terminus of Hidden Creek

Boulevard. This comes before you with a recommendation to approve.

MarianoChair

Is there anyone here to speak against item P eighty eight?

Starkey

There was no one signed up.

MarianoChair

Go on online. Well can keep that on consent. Item P eighty nine.

Starkey

P eighty nine was advertised in the Tampa Bay Times May twenty-seventh, twenty twenty six, and by affidavit of certified mailings and site postings.

Amy Heiler

Item P89 is a conditional use request in the name of St. Joe Road LLC and BD Agritourism LLC. It's a conditional use permit to combine two previously approved conditional use permits, CU 12-07 and CU 19-01, into one unified conditional use permit for an amusement park in an AC agriculture. Agricultural District located in north-central Pasco County, approximately 840 feet east

of the intersection of State Road. Or I'm sorry, uh Saint Joe Road and Bellamy Brothers Boulevard containing approximately one hundred and eighteen acres. This comes before you with a recommendation to approve with conditions.

MarianoChair

So Phoenix Saint Joe Ranch LLC and B B agro tourism LLC. Is there anyone here speak in opposition to that?

Starkey

And there is someone signed up.

MarianoChair

Item P ninety.

Starkey

P90 was advertised in the Tampa Bay Times May 27, 2026 and by affidavit of certified mailings and site postings.

Amy Heiler

Item P ninety is PDE twenty six dash.

MarianoChair

there are two people. So we're gonna sign up, we're just gonna pull that. They're companions. All right, so pull pull P ninety.

Starkey

And one. Okay. One and

MarianoChair

And that is the end of the consent agenda. Now ninety one. Ninety

Starkey

one and ninety.

MarianoChair

Okay.

Amy Heiler

It looks like we have two more at

MarianoChair

least on this note. Sorry, sorry. Alright, so P ninety one.

Starkey

Oh me. Sorry. P ninety one. Tampa Bay uh advertised at Tampa Bay Times, May twenty seventh, twenty twenty-six. I apologize.

Amy Heiler

Thank you. Uh P ninety one is PDE twenty-six dash zero seven zero six. It's a development agreement in the name of Kenton Road Commercial Development Agreement, Kenton Road Commercial L C. It's a development agreement for the Kenton Road Commercial MPUD to design a permit and Construct Kenton Road from Elam Road to Overpass Road as a two-lane road, inclusive of intersection improvements in exchange for cash reimbursement within connected city located in central Pasco County. This item comes before you with a recommendation to approve.

MarianoChair

Okay. Anyone here to speak in opposition or P ninety one?

Starkey

I I I do have a question on this one.

Ask it right now.

Oakley

Good.

Starkey

Um since the Orange Belt Trail is coming right beside this What kind of driveways and uses are are happening here. I'm trying to remember what this one was that where the where we're protected.

Or is it not right beside here?

WeightmanVice Chair

Uh

Starkey

I don't know my map, I thought it was by Bellamy and

WeightmanVice Chair

This is way south. This is it overpassed.

Starkey

That never

MarianoChair

so we'll leave it on. Okay, we'll leave that on consent.

Starkey

I was thinking that was the uh Amazon building.

MarianoChair

Okay. All right, P ninety two, do we have proof?

Starkey

P ninety two was advertised in the Tampa Bay Times May twenty-seventh, twenty twenty six, and by affidavit of certified mailings and site postings.

Amy Heiler

P92 is PDE 26-7927. It's a zoning amendment in the name of 52 and Bellamy Investment Group L L C Bellamy Parcel Rezoning. Get you off.

MarianoChair

I did ask I did think I did ask for public comment, right?

Starkey

No, for not on the one I believe so.

MarianoChair

All right, so let me stop here saying Did anyone here speak is anyone in opposition of P ninety one? So I did test that she's a loser bill. Okay. No, we did we did cover that. Okay. Okay. P ninety two.

Amy Heiler

Yeah, okay. Um so P ninety two is a change in zoning from an I one Light Industrial Park District to a C two General Commercial District, located in central Pasco County at the southeast corner of the intersection of State Road fifty two and Bellamy Brothers Boulevard, containing approximately one point five one acres. This one comes before you with a recommendation to approve.

Oakley

Okay.

Starkey

Okay, I think this is the one I th I was on the wrong one. So I have that question.

Unidentified speakerVoice A

Let's see if there's public opposition while we're going to be able to do that.

MarianoChair

Is there any other proposition of P92?

Starkey

Because

Yeah, because they already constructed Bellmy with a sidewalk on the left side, so the multi use Trail. There will be something on the east side. And where where is that where are we going from the West Side. of Bellamy south of fifty two to the east side of Bellamy before we cross fifty two.

MarianoChair

No

Starkey

crossing it.

MarianoChair

All right, Bell Trail.

Starkey

No, no, we I wish we could go along the bottom, but right now we can't. One day I think we will. But right now we have to go up Bellamy. And all those high school kids are gonna have to cross fifty two. that are riding their bikes to school and scooters, cross fifty-two, go down fifty-two, and cross fifty-two again to get on Old Pasco Road. But for now, we're going up Bellamy and crossing So how is that happening with this parcel?

MarianoChair

So let's pull this at item and we'll come back to it. So it's after looking at it while we wait for that.

Starkey

So this is 92.

MarianoChair

All right, can we have a motion for the rest of the consent agenda? So moved. Second. All in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. Okay, so.