Motion for PC9 approval
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
This archive found it in the recording: a call to order, a recess, or business the board never listed. The county recorded nothing about it, so everything below is our reading.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, Sep 3, 2020
The published PDF. Its text could not be extracted, because it is an image-only scan, so nothing in it is searchable here. It still reads normally.
The county’s minutes for Planning Commission, Sep 3, 2020
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
Machine transcription of 1m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 94% of 16 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Yeah. So uh we're gonna we wanna go back to uh five or nine.
Fine.
Do the do the roll call vote for nine or a motion for nine and then we'll back go back to five.
Right. Mr. This Michael Cox approval on PC nine.
Okay, so we have a motion. Do we have a second?
Peter Hansel, second.
Okay, so we have a motion and a second further discussion on the motion. All in favor by roll call?
Michael Cox.
Hi
Peter Hansel.
Hi.
Christopher Poole?
Aye.
Chris Williams?
Aye.
Chairman Charles Gray. Aye.