transit emphasis corridor updated to multimodal emphasis corridor
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
This archive found it in the recording: a call to order, a recess, or business the board never listed. The county recorded nothing about it, so everything below is our reading.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, Oct 8, 2026
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, Oct 8, 2026
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
Machine transcription of 3m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 100% of 12 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
note a change that happened between the last workshop with some of the With some of the feedback that we got from the LPA workshop. And uh what we We're alluding to if you look at policy growth one ten one. Mixed use nodes overlay and multimodal emphasis corridors. We are
We took uh we heard Mr. Moody's comments and we really thought about Yeah, what could it be in the future? sort of two placeholders on that whole discussion that we had with regard to trends and emphasis corridors. There had been also stakeholder feedback um that
A ver. Are we going to be able to have transit on all of these different core? So Um and what does that transit look like? Is it possible? Could it be something? Can it be something else? So we thought a little bit about that. And and instead we opted to think more in terms of multimodal emphasis corridors versus transit-specific emphasis corridors so that you could have different modal types. operating within these corridors. Um and not necessarily have all of your planning
dependent on just buses. Whatever that might be. So that is a also a new term to to Mr. Gulsey's point about the Multimodal mixed use design standards. We also updated our the concept of the transient emphasis quarter to be a multimodal emphasis quarter. And that helps to actually prioritize some of the county priorities where we want to see trails on these arterial roadways or these collector roadways. how the land uses interact with these trails is going to be a key. key thing in in in
the development of the county. So that can be accounted for now in the comprehensive
plan and not just thinking about buses.
The map stayed the same, so we we have to change the uh the name of the map, map two-23. Transit emphasis quarter will be Um Multi model emphasis corporate.
Yeah, Thoughts, comments?
If not. Then we can move on to goals. Grows. Cold two.
Well you guys go
back to Gul Gold Rose One also. But we can continue with the presentation, walk through what's updated in Goals Grow Two. Uh and then talk a little bit about that. Then cover everything,
any other questions that the Commissioner Weightman. No.