ZONING AMENDMENT (CONSENT) - Project Arthur MPUD Master Planned Unit Development - Angeline Corp, Bexley J P TR & Bexley M H TR & J & M Family Partnership, Bexley James P Rev Trust & Bexley Mabel H Rev Trust, and Len- Angeline LLC - A Rezoning Request From A-C Agricultural, R-4 High Density Residential, R-1MH Single Family/Mobile Home and I-1 Light Industrial Park Districts to an MPUD Master Planned Unit Development District to Allow 11,495 Residential Units; 5,150,000 Square-Feet of Commercial/Retail/Office; 300,000 Square-Feet of Light Industrial; and 24,000,000 square feet of Corporate Business Park on Approximately 6,951.1 Acres
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Approval with conditions
DispositionApproved
Approved as part of the Public Hearing Consent Agenda.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, May 23, 2019
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Planning Commission, May 23, 2019
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PDD-19-7371 in full →PDD-19-7371 was taken up 2 times between May 23, 2019 and Jun 19, 2019 — this is appearance 1.
- May 23, 2019PlanningPC1▶Approvedthis item
- Jun 19, 2019BoardP6Approved
What was said
Machine transcription of 5m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 100% of 26 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Good afternoon, Planning Commission Members. Denise Hernandez, Planning and Development. I'm going to go through the uh consent item, the consent agenda first. First item is PC1 PDD 197371. This is a zoning amendment in the name of Project Arthur MPUD Master Plan Unit Development, Angeline Corp, Bexley JPTR, and Bexley M H T R, and J and M Family Partnership. Um this is uh sorry about that. DNM Family
Partnership, Bexley James P Revocable Trust, and Bexley Mabel H Revocable Trust, and Len Angeline LLC. I apologize. A rezoning request from AC Agricultural, R4 High Density Residential, R1 M H Single Family Mobile Home, and I1 Light Industrial Park Districts to an MPUD Master Plan Unit Development District to allow 11,495,495 residential units. Units, 5,150,000 square feet of commercial retail office, 300,000 square feet of light industrial, and 24,000
square feet of corporate business park on approximately 6,951.1 acres. This comes to you with a recommendation of approval with conditions as contained in your packet that was distributed to the Planning Commission. In addition, there is an ex parte communication between Chairman Gray and the applicant and that will be submitted to the clerk's office as All
right.
24 million, I apologize. 24 million square feet of corporate business park on six thousand six thousand nine fifty-one point one acres. I apologize for that.
All right. Thank you.
Uh is the applicant present?
Yeah. I was just gonna make a comment along with that. I didn't do an ex parte, but as part of my job function, I've had several discussions with the applicant on School conditions.
Okay. Mr. Chairman M too had a ex parte communication. I believe it was been filed. Okay. Anybody
else? Okay. All right. So is the applicant present. Anyone here to object? See no objections? Next.
Okay, the the following item is PC2, and for this item, you're at you actually are sitting as a local planning agency because it's a development agreement, so you're wearing the hat as a local planning agency. It's PDD 191014, Watergrass Promenade Business Center Development Agreement. It's an agreement between Pasco County and CKBK Development LLC in connection with the development of the Promenade Business Center, an employment center consisting of Of approximately 77.08 acres, 53.7 acres of net master roadway drainage wetlands
within the Watergrass Project, Parcel One, at the intersection of Curley Road and Over Pass Road. This comes here with a recommendation of approval.
Okay. Is the applicant present? Anyone here to object?
The following item is also listed as consent, so if I may go through that one as well, item P three.
Yes.
Okay. So item P3 is you're also sitting as a local planning agency on that on that item. It's PDD 19-0982. It's a comprehensive plan amendment, CPAL 1913, for the 2025 Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment, providing for a text amendment to Objective Future Land Use 1.1 Principles for Growth Management and a text amendment to future land to policy future land use 1.4.4. Four residential compatibility, buffer standards between residential and non-residential land uses,
and it comes to you with a recommendation of approval.
Okay, thank you. Anyone here? Uh yeah, but Yeah, done here. You want to hear the object? No objections, okay
and on item I I should mention that on item PC two and PC three as you're sitting as the local planning agency, on those items, what we're wanting you to find is for to for you to find it consistent with a comprehensive plan and to uh recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners.
And that uh is the end of your consent agenda.
Mr. Chairman Mariano
the consent agenda.
Second.
Okay, we have a motion to approve the consent agenda and Specifically PC two and three, consistent with the comprehensive plan. As noted. Okay. So any uh you have a second, right? Yes. Okay. Further discussion, all in favor? Opposed.
Just under discussion. I just want to say even though PC of one is on consent, there was a lot of work that went into PC one. So I don't want you to think because it was a five minute presentation that there were there's a lot of people in the audience that spend a lot of time Probably the last six months they met once a week or twice a week to get that to you today. So there's a lot of work that went into it.
I had the several of us I think had the benefit of meeting with uh the uh representative for the applicant and Uh well the this book that we went through was quite voluminous, so I'm uh I'm definitely aware of that. No. It was a great job, I thought, when I reviewed it, so Looking forward to that. Thank you, Clark. Okay.