R1No disposition in the minutesRegular businessPublished agenda
CLOSED ATTORNEY -CLIENT SESSION – Immediately Following the Consent Agenda RE: Litigation Assessment Meeting pursuant to Section 286.011(8), Florida Statutes, for the case of IN RE: National Prescription Opiate Litigation, Case No. 1:17-MD-2804 (United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division) MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS - DISTRICT ONE - COMMISSIONER OAKLEY MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS - DISTRICT TWO - COMMISSIONER MOORE MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS - DISTRICT THREE - COMMISSIONER STARKEY MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS - DISTRICT FOUR - COMMISSIONER WELLS MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS - DISTRICT FIVE - COMMISSIONER MARIANO MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS - COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS - COUNTY ATTORNEY MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS - CLERK AND COMPTROLLER MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS - SHERIFF
What the county recorded
No disposition in the minutes
The approved minutes do not say what became of this item. That is a gap in the record, not a decision. It is the normal state for 24% of items. Most of those are regular business and board reports that the minutes do not dispose of in writing. This archive never infers an outcome from the fact that someone called a vote.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Oct 7, 2019
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
There is no recording of this meeting
Only 283 of the 1,214 meetings in this archive have a recording, and only 9% of decided items are bound to one. The record above is the whole record for this item.