Published agendas and the dispositions the approved minutes recorded. Twelve years, whether or not a camera was running.

No item matched every word, so this matched any of them — most words first.

• Mar 10, 2016Development Review Committee
  R4No disposition in the minutesPublished agenda

  NOTED ITEM: LRG, Commercial Development Review - First Baptist Church of Dade City-Phase One Preliminary Site Plan/Construction Plan and Stormwater Management Plan and Report (Project No. LRG15-018) - First Baptist Church of Dade City Inc. - East Pasco, on the southwest corner of the intersection of State Road 52 and Smith Road - Section 05, Township 25, Range 21.

  NOTED ITEMS – INTERNAL STAFF APPROVED ITEMS ONLYPDD-16-716District 1

• Mar 9, 2017Development Review Committee
  R3No disposition in the minutesPublished agenda

  NOTED ITEM: Commercial Subdivision Development Review - Dean Dairy Road and Eiland Boulevard Commercial Site-Preliminary Development Plan/Construction Plan and Stormwater Management Plan and Report (Project No. NSD16-004) - Streetside at Zephyrhills, LLC - East Pasco; Northeast corner of Dean Dairy Road and Eiland Boulevard; approximately 800 feet south and 700 feet east of the Zephyrhills City Limits - Section 04, Township 26, Range 21.

  Recommendation: Not ApplicablePDD-17-360District 1

• Mar 31, 2016Development Review Committee
  R2ContinuedPublished agenda

  NOTED ITEM: Residential Subdivision Development Review - Estancia, Phases 2B-1 and 2B-2 Construction Plan (Project No. RSD15-014) - Standard Pacific of Florida, a Florida General Partnership by: Standard Pacific of Florida GP, A Delaware Corporation, its Managing General Partner - South Pasco, northeast of the Bruce B. Downs Boulevard and Chancey Road intersection, south of the future Bella Corsa Boulevard, west of the Wiregrass Ranch Boulevard- Sections 18, 19, Township 26, Range 20.

  NOTED ITEMS – INTERNAL STAFF APPROVED ITEMS ONLYPDD-16-589District 2

  Approved minutes

  Continued to April 14, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. in Dade City.

Machine transcription of 283 recorded meetings — 9% of decided items have one. Speaker names are inferred from voice and can be wrong.

Nothing in the recordings matches Connected City. Most meetings have no recording, so a result of zero does not mean the county never discussed it.