Machine transcription of 283 recorded meetings — 9% of decided items have one. Speaker names are inferred from voice and can be wrong.
- R51Stormwater Management Master Plan Update – No Funding Required
Several speakers Kathryn Starkey: Oh yeah.
- R51Stormwater Management Master Plan Update – No Funding Required
Several speakers Unidentified A: Yeah. Kathryn Starkey: Storm water management. Jason Mickle: Yes.
- R51Stormwater Management Master Plan Update – No Funding Required
Several speakers Jason Mickle: I was your planner.
- R51Stormwater Management Master Plan Update – No Funding Required
Several speakers Jason Mickle: We have a small percentage that we could plan for of that, about four to five million dollars a year has been the average week. In in capital for stormwater projects.
- R51Stormwater Management Master Plan Update – No Funding Required
Several speakers Ron Oakley: to do.
- R51Stormwater Management Master Plan Update – No Funding Required
Several speakers Kathryn Starkey: Valley now that I look at it?
- P70Zoning Amendment (Regular) – Enclave at Livingston MPUD – Academy at the Lakes – Rezoning Request from an A-R Agricultural-Residential Zoning District to MPUD Master Planned Unit Development District to Allow for the Development of 178 Townhome Dwelling Units and Associated Infrastructure on Approximately 46.3 Acres Located in South-Central Pasco
Several speakers Planning and Development staff: I guess I'm putting on my stormwater hat. That was that was a joke. Um there should be stormwater at a minimum. Is there anybody online from Stormwater?
- R51Stormwater Management Master Plan Update – No Funding Required
Several speakers Kathryn Starkey: you're showing fifteen Uh ranks rankings here, but you have a hundred projects.
- P89Zoning Amendment (Consent) – Siddiqui Rafat Ali – Change in Zoning from a
Ron Oakley If we approve this then Um they will have to comply to what landscape review and all that. comes back in compliance, but not necessarily stormwater. That's what I'm saying. of the surfaces stays the same. Drop a P. And they wouldn't be required to have any stormwater In front
- R51Stormwater Management Master Plan Update – No Funding Required
Several speakers Kathryn Starkey: We haven't given it to them yet, but we're about to.
- R51Stormwater Management Master Plan Update – No Funding Required
Several speakers Kathryn Starkey: I Jason Mickle: mean
- R51Stormwater Management Master Plan Update – No Funding Required
Unidentified speaker So or what this goal of this where I'm here right now for is to present the summary of the master plan scope and results, an overview. Again it'll be a pretty quick overview. Since we've had the chance to disseminate this information quite a bit. But then importantly, receive the Stormwater master plan update with you all receiving and approve the ranking of the top 15 projects, which we'll talk about in a little bit. Uh so that they move forward for further design and permitting. Now jumping in, what were the desired uh priorities outcomes of the project? Um as stormwater master plan connotates, it's all about stormwater. Now there's a big focus on flooding, of course, but there's also other elements that we looked at in the in the plan to put together uh this roadmap for the county to move forward. So in addition to flood abatement, there is the idea of effective drainage and how that's maintained in the county, operations and maintenance, regulatory compliance, and really with the goal of developing an actionable capital improvement