PDD-22-0058

Every appearance2 of 2 are in a recording

Each appearance carries the official title above. Where the county’s wording changed, the change is marked: added and removed. Steps with no marks were worded identically.

TranscriptWhat was said at each appearance is below it. Machine transcription, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 80% of 51 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.

1. 1Dec 7, 2021
   Board of County CommissionersP119Public hearingApproved

   Approved minutes

   Approved Staff’s recommendation.

   Open this item →▶ Play from 45:48
   ▶ 45:482m1/2

   StarkeyVice Chair

   45:48And we have P one one nine.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   45:50Item P one nineteen was published in the Tampa Bay Times on October twentieth, twenty twenty-one.

   Denise

   45:55On this item, this is the transmittal. Uh so we're just asking you to accept public comment. So there's no action required today, just authorized, actually authorized transmittal to the Department of Economic Opportunity and other reviewing agencies. PDD 220058, comprehensive plan amendments, C Pal 2104, Chapter 7 Transportation Element, providing for text amendments to Chapter 7 Transportation Element, Table 7-2A, quarter preservation, repealing. Table 7-2B providing for map amendments amendments to Vision Highway, the Highway Vision Plan and Functional Class

   46:25Map 7-36 and the Transportation Corridor Preservation Maps, Map 7-37, and providing for additional text amendments as necessary for internal consistency. I do want to mention that exhibits B and C have been modified. Um, the table and map Plath Road extension from Decubelus to Little Road was Incorrectly listed as 80 feet of right-of-way. It's been modified to 60 feet of right-of-way. Those modifications have been provided to the clerk's office.

   Unidentified speakerVoice B

   46:51Yeah.

   Denise

   46:52Are

   StarkeyVice Chair

   46:52they gonna put

   Denise

   46:52that up here? 'Cause they're only showing one picture.

   StarkeyVice Chair

   46:57This

   Denise

   46:58plast this is the pages, um it should be page nineteen of your attachment for exhibit B.

   47:06That one uh where it calls out Plath Road extension from Decubelist to Little should be sixty feet, not eighty feet.

   StarkeyVice Chair

   47:14Okay, is there anyone who wants to speak? Um We do have someone signed up. Okay, we'll poll one one eight. We're gonna be here a long time. Oh sorry, one one nine. Okay. Uh one we'll pull one one nine. All right, one two zero.

   ▶ 1:01:056m2/2

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   1:01:05Item one nineteen, we have Rob Um Perrill signed up to speak to this item.

   Rob Park

   1:01:21Rob Park, [address removed], I'm sworn.

   1:01:28I'm specifically concerned with my small world where I live on [address removed]. And more broadly, if these are consistencies just where I live, how much of the rest of the proposed changes are flawed? First, Aaron Cutoff is a collector road. In an addendum to the existing Chapter seven transportation element, there is wording, quote, collectors serve as connecting links between local streets and arterials, end quote. The wording goes on quote collectors do

   1:01:59not form continuous network and generally discourage through traffic, end quote. Aaron cut off. Connects arterial roads US forty one and state road fifty two. Ninety nine point nine percent of the traffic on air and cutoff is arterial traffic. there doesn't seem to be any discouraging of through traffic. In fact, the proposed change to table seven two increases air and cutoff from two lanes to four lanes. This contradicts

   1:02:29what your predecessors put in place. and what your predecessors put in writing. In the proposed text amendments to Chapter seven, the second paragraph ends with the words, quote, Meet established community goals and perver preserving the quality of life, end quote. How does putting a four lane road a hundred feet from my front door preserve quality of life. I have lived on [address removed] for forty years. aside from Outlaw

   1:03:00Ridge and the abomination of Caliente and Aaron Cutoff, There has been no change on air and cutoff to justify the increased traffic. Second. At a January 2020 MPO meeting, I pointed out that a portion of the Collier Parkway extension had been eliminated, but was still drawn on the proposed maps. This was confirmed by an executive planner at the MPO, and it was understood the map would be corrected. Proposed

   1:03:30maps 735 and 736 are not corrected. In addition, both maps show Caliente as an existing collector road from US 41 to Aaron Cutoff. It is not a through road. Both maps show future Collier Parkway extension, different from the eliminated segment, as a four lane collector road about a half a mile west of Aaron Cutoff. Why two four lane roads that start and end together? Third, emphasis should not be

   1:04:00in slicing up the county with these so-called corridors. Emphasis should be on keeping arterial traffic on arterial roads. Emphasis should be on maintaining collector roads and not as shortcuts in between arterial roads. Emphasis should be on maintaining the vision of your predecessors. and still add your vibrance. Fourth, I urge this board not to pass these amendments until they are corrected, scrutinized, and verified. Thanks.

   StarkeyVice Chair

   1:04:34Uh I'm sorry, you're not allowed to clap here, so plea please uh don't do that. Um Does someone want to answer if uh Erin wrote

   Unidentified speakerVoice C

   1:04:45if there's any more

   StarkeyVice Chair

   1:04:46Is there anyone else who wants to speak to this?

   1:04:49Okay. Can someone uh Well I'm gonna close for close it for public comment and could you please talk about Aaron Cutoff?

   Unidentified speakerVoice D

   1:04:57Hello everyone. This is Amir Jamali, uh with Planning and Development Department. Uh actually I wanna say and make a clarification. This table is not for actual um projects. This table preserves the right-of-way for future possible improvements if we wanna widen or expand the roadways. So it is the all can be an ultimate design for that roadways. Uh so so right now as of today the

   1:05:28county has no plan to widen the roadways uh And if we want to pl uh plan any uh expansion then we can discuss later. So I just want to make sure I think this comment is not related to the Quidditch Preservation table because it's for the ultimate uh design for the when the county is picked up.

   Denise

   1:05:51Okay.

   Unidentified speakerVoice E

   1:05:52Any questions? Commissioner Starkey. Yes.

   Fitzpatrick

   1:05:55Are are you planning to build a road there? Are you just widening it and getting right away for a vis planning of a visionary road?

   Unidentified speakerVoice D

   1:06:05So the vision is to uh construct that roadway as four lane if we have more developments in that area. If more development comes in into the picture for sure we need more capacity improvements to carry the traffic.

   StarkeyVice Chair

   1:06:28Okay.

   1:06:31Terry's answering my question. You can come up. Yeah. Yeah, I think we're good. Do I uh any more questions? I'll entertain a motion.

   Unidentified speakerVoice F

   1:06:44Second move. Second.

2. 2Feb 8, 2022
   Board of County CommissionersP34Public hearingAdopted

   An Ordinance Amending The Pasco County Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Consent) - CPAL21(04) Chapter 7 Transportation Element - Plan; Providing for For Text Amendments to To Chapter 7, Transportation Element, Table 7-2A, 7-2a, Corridor Preservation and Preservation, Repealing Table 7-2B; Providing for 7-2b; Map Amendments to the To The Highway Vision Plan and And Functional Class (Map 7-36) and the And The Transportation Corridor Preservation Map (Map 7-35); and Providing for And Additional Text Amendments as Necessary for Internal For Consistency

   Approved minutes

   Approved to adopt by a roll call vote.

   Open this item →▶ Play from 3:16
   ▶ 3:162m

   StarkeyChair

   3:16Aye. Okay, P thirty four.

   StarkeyChair

   3:21We uh have proof of publication of the hearing of this matter in the October 20th edition of the Tampa Bay Times.

   Denise

   3:30P thirty-four is PD 220058. This is an ordinance amending the Pasco County Comprehensive Plan providing for text amendments to Chapter 7 Transportation Element, Table 7-2A, Procorder Preservation, Repealing Table 7-2B, Map Amendments to the Highway Vision Plan and Functional Class. Map 7-36 and the transportation quarter preservation map, map seven-37 and additional text amendments for consistency. This was presented to a local planning agency on 11.4 of 21. We found it consistent with the comprehensive plan and recommended approval to the board.

   4:01And it was transmitted on 12.7 of 21. Today we're asking that you hold a public hearing, take public comment, and adopt by roll call vote.

   StarkeyChair

   4:13Okay, so is there anyone who wishes to discuss this item? Anyone signed up to discuss this?

   StarkeyChair

   4:21We have no one signed up for item thirty-four.

   StarkeyChair

   4:24Board members?

   4:28Move for approval. Second.

   4:29All in favor?

   Unidentified speakerVoice C

   4:30It's

   StarkeyChair

   4:30a roll call vote.

   StarkeyChair

   4:31A roll call again. Okay. It's an ordinance.

   StarkeyChair

   4:33Yes.

   StarkeyChair

   4:34Okay, sorry. Ordinance. Roll call. Roll call.

   StarkeyChair

   4:37District one, Commissioner Oakley. Aye. District two, Commissioner Moore. Aye. District four, Commissioner Fitzpatrick.

   StarkeyChair

   4:43Aye.

   StarkeyChair

   4:44District five, Commissioner Mariano. Aye. District three, Chairman Starkey.

   StarkeyChair

   4:48Aye.