PDD-22-0465
Published agenda2 appearances between Aug 4, 2022 and Sep 6, 2022, at 2 boards.
Approved to adopt by a roll call vote.
Official title
An Ordinance Amending The Pasco County Comprehensive Plan; Providing For A Small-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment To The Future Land Use Map (Map 2-15 And Sheet 05) From RES-1 (Residential-1 Du/Ga) To RES-9 (Residential-9 Du/Ga) On Approximately 19.231 Acres Of Real Property Located On The North Side Of Shady Hills Road And South Of The Intersection Of Crela Drive; And Providing For Additional Text Amendments As Necessary For Internal Consistency; Providing For A Repealer, Severability, And An Effective Date.
On a calendar
Aug 4, 2022 → Sep 6, 2022 · click a mark to jump to that appearance
Every appearance2 of 2 are in a recording
Each appearance carries the official title above. Where the county’s wording changed, the change is marked: added and removed. Steps with no marks were worded identically.
TranscriptWhat was said at each appearance is below it. Machine transcription, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 88% of 88 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
- 1
An Ordinance Amending The Pasco CountySmall-Scale ComprehensivePlan; Providing For APlan Amendment (Regular) - CPAS 22(12) Crela Estates – Small-Scale Comprehensive Plan AmendmentTo Theto the Future Land UseMapMaps (Map 2-15Andand Sheet05) From5) from RES-1 (Residential-1Du/Ga) To RES-9DU/GA) to RES- 9 (Residential-9Du/Ga) On ApproximatelyDU/GA) on Approx. 19.231 AcresOfof Real Property LocatedOn The North Side Ofon the Northside of Shady Hills RoadAndand SouthOf The Intersection Ofof the intersection of CrelaDrive; And Providing For Additional Text Amendments As Necessary For Internal Consistency; Providing For A Repealer, Severability, And An Effective Date.Drive.2m1/2Charles GreyChairOkay. Denise, do you wanna
Jon MoodyMr. Chairman before Denise speaks, I think you mentioned that you might want to move some items from regular to consent. Yeah. So if that's the will of the Planning Commission, you should probably should bring those up now. Okay, good.
Charles GreyChairUm so item P seven. And item uh uh the walk-on P10. Um those are the two items that I'd like to put on consent. Um we as far as we know, we haven't had any objections to those items, so
Jon MoodyIf we could get that in the form of a motion from somebody to move into the consent agenda. And then you can still have for public comment once they're on the consent agenda, but
Unidentified speakerVoice AJ just for clarification, item P ten, is is that the V O P H item?
Jon MoodyYeah. Yes.
Unidentified speakerVoice AYeah. I don't know why but it's shown as a different item on the actual agenda online.
Hidden Creek Boulevard, is that V O P H is that same thing? Okay. I'm sorry. Part of the confusion
Jon Moodywas that the subject line of that changed from the time it
was
on the agenda to to what was emailed to you. Okay. Um but yes, that is the V O P H item. Okay. So I think if if the Planning Commission is okay moving those two items to consent, should probably do that in the form of a motion. So moved.
Charles GreyChairYeah about second.
Jon MoodySecond.
Charles GreyChairOkay. Any further discussion? All in favor, say goodbye by saying aye. Aye. Opposed, like sign? Okay, and as with all the uh items on consent, as we go through them, if uh somebody has would like an opportunity to speak, just raise your hand or pull it.
Okay.
7m2/2Unidentified speakerVoice BItem P 6 is a zoning amendment, in the name of 54 Crossings, MPUD Master Planning Development by Kowell Avenue properties. 4 LLC, a substantial MPD modification request to add an additional allowed use of a technical trade at nursing school utilizing a maximum of 60,000 square feet of existing office entitlements on approximately 22.16 acres. This item comes with a recommendation of approval with conditions. All right. This is
Charles GreyChaira consent item. Uh is any more is the applicant present?
Anyone here to object?
Jon MoodyUm just to be clear, uh Denise or Terry, whoever's handling this, is there anybody that's registered in a WebEx for any of these items? I'll just ask the questions now.
DeniseRegistered on WebEx for any of these items.
Unidentified speakerThank you.
Charles GreyChairThank you. All right. Uh having seen nobody to object, we'll move on to the next item of consent.
Unidentified speakerVoice BThank you. Item PC P seven is a small scale comprehensive plan amendment in the name of C Pas twenty-two twelve. Krella estates. It's a small scale comprehensive plan amendment to the future land use maps, map two-fifteen and sheet five, from res one residential one dwelling in a per gross acre to res residential to res nine, residential nine dwelling units per gross acre on approximately nineteen point twenty-three acres of real property located on the north side of Shady Hills Road and south side of intersect of the intersection
of Krella Drive. This comes up with a recommendation to find it consistent with the comprehensive plan and approve. And this is an item as the LPA local planning agency.
Charles GreyChairOkay. Uh so this is a consent item as well. Is there any is the applicant present? Anyone here to object?
See no objections? Next.
Unidentified speakerVoice BAnd then believe item P10, WP10, is the last item on the consent agenda. It is a large-scale county comprehensive plan amendment in the name of CPAL 2211 Hidden Creek Boulevard. Intermediate roadway. Uh large scale company to the fundamental.
Jon MoodyWhat's the current plane? Oh. Are you are you talking about P C nine?
No, I'm talking about P ten. P ten C9's on consent to, isn't it? Well, we can get to P9 in a second, but I realize you're reading from the agenda, Terry, but the agenda memo has a different name for this item. Oh.
DeniseI can read the item if you'd like.
Jon MoodyOkay, thank you. Okay, thank you, Denise.
DeniseSure, you're very welcome. Um, the item is, and this is uh WP10. The item is PDD 220370. It's a comprehensive plan amendment, C PAL 2211, Villages of Pasadena Hills roadway adjustments. It's a comprehensive plan amendment to the villages of Pasadena Hills Comprehensive Plan Goal Flu 6, J Ben Hand. Villages of Pasadena Hills to make roadway changes in figures pH 2, pH 4, pH 4A, PH eight, pH 12, and pH
13, amending transportation map 7-36, highway vision map, and other amendments as necessary for internal consistency, providing for severability and an effective date. On this item, we're asking that you find the the proposed modifications sitting as the LPA consistent with the Pasco County Comprehensive Plan and recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners.
Unidentified speakerVoice BIn addition,
Jon Moodyuh They take action, let her finish handing it out so at least you know what you're taking action on.
Unidentified speakerVoice BIn addition, an update was made to the information that was delivered.
Jon MoodyIt was a walk off. I think it's this was emailed to you as well. Yeah.
Yeah.
Okay.
All right. And you asked for public comment on that one, I forgot.
Charles GreyChairYeah. Is the applicant
Jon Moodypresent? The applicant I believe is the county.
Charles GreyChairYeah. So anyone here to speak on this topic?
Okay. Somebody raised their hand over there. Oh they did? Yes, sir? You'd like to speak?
Unidentified speakerVoice CI agree. I agree.
Charles GreyChairOkay, we have almost unanimous vote on that.
Yeah, Chuck. Uh okay, so would can you hear me now? Yeah. Okay.
Jon MoodyMr. Chairman in abundance of caution I I would ask again for the three consent items, not the continuance items, but the three consent items whether anybody's here to object to item PC six, PC seven, Or P or P ten. We haven't talked about P nine yet, but I I wanna Because Denise aren't you pulling P9 from consent?
DeniseUm
I just also wanna say that PC eight is also on consent.
Jon MoodyWell PCA I know needs some discussion. So
Charles GreyChairSo to reverse ourselves for a minute since you might not have heard, uh do we have anyone who n intended to speak on uh on P six, P seven, or P ten?
I don't see anyone.
Jon MoodyOkay. I think in the abundance of the caution, let's take action on these those three first. Okay. And then we can revisit P nine and P eight.
Charles GreyChairOkay. All right, so uh I'd like to hear a motion uh to approve consent items that we discussed.
Jaimie GirardiVice ChairSo moved.
Charles GreyChairAnd those were uh seven
Jaimie GirardiVice ChairPC six, P7, and WP ten.
Charles GreyChairRight. Second. Okay, so we have a motion and a second. Any further discussion on the motion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed, like signed. Okay.
- 2
Approved minutes
Approved to adopt by a roll call vote.
8mRon OakleyItem P seventy one.
Kathryn StarkeyChairOh sorry, P seventy one.
Ron OakleyItem P seventy one was published in the Tampe Times on July twentieth, twenty twenty-two.
Ed ZodianMadam Chair, Members of Council, my name's Ed Zodian. I'm planner with long range. The matter before you is an ordinance amending the Pasco County Comprehensive Plan providing for a small scale comprehensive plan amendment to the future land use map two-fifteen and sheet five from res one, it's residential one dwelling unit per gross acre to res nine residential nine dwelling units per gross acre on approximately nineteen point two three one. Acres of
real property located on the north side of Shady Hills Road and the south and south of the intersection of Crella Drive. and providing for additional tax amendments for as necessary for internal consistency, providing for repealer, severability, and effective date. I'll be delighted to answer any questions. This matter does come to you from the LPA with the unanimous recommendation of approval.
Kathryn StarkeyChairUm, I think the applicant is here. We'll let her make her presentation unless you have a question for staff. No? Okay.
Barbara WilhiteBarbara Woolheist, sixty-three twenty seven Grand Boulevard, New Port Richey, three four six five two for the applicant. We would just let you know that we did reach out to all of our neighbors on a couple occasions, trying to solicit their input, and we have not received any public comment. Um Planning Commission has recommended both approval of this Complant Amendment. They've also heard the rezoning, the companion rezoning to MF one as well, and they've recommended approval of that as well. I do have my team here, if we have any particular questions. I know we've met with Commissioner Mariano
and I can if he wants to jump in or I can jump in with some of the things we've discussed. Um either way we can uh
Jack MarianoVice Chairif you bring it's better.
Barbara WilhiteYeah, you want me to go over the items we've discussed? Sure, sure. So today is just the comp plan amendment and staff's recommending that you approve the comp plan amendment. We have to come back with the rezoning and that rezoning and we're coming back um I have to remember now I talked about like two different projects today. So at the beginning of October we're coming back with the rezoning. But in connection with the rezoning, Commissioner Mariano asked that we look at a couple of different things. One is to coordinate further with the school board. We did have a beginning conversation with the school board
to talk about connectivity. We're kind of in a unique unique location here on Shady Hills Road. We have an elementary school as our adjacent property to the east, Mary Jayelle Elementary School. So we want to talk about whether there's whether they would prefer us to have a direct connection? through our project. Um so that's one thing and then we have to our north, not adjacent to the north, but to the north. Uh north of adjacent to Corella, which will be our access, there is a middle school, Cruise Lake Middle School.
So we're gonna be talking to them about the connections there. Now specifically We talked to the commissioner about The fact that there is a sidewalk that within Shady Hills right of way that comes down to Krella from the middle school. It's all on the middle school. And then there's a gap from Krella through a piece of property that's a single family home. Parcel. and then our property and then Mary Jella, there's a gap between Mary Jella
along and then their the sidewalk picks up as it goes down shady hills towards the Sun Coast Parkway. So we are going to look at Trying to fill in that gap. Our project is required along our frontage by code to put in a five foot sidewalk along our frontage. The request is to look and see if we can make that an eight foot path as well as making those two off site connections um beyond our project so that there will be there would be a sidewalk coming from Suncoast Parkway all along Shady
Hills up to Cruise Lake. And so we're we're starting that process Um our engineer looked at it. There is a pinch point as you just come off of our north property line. the right-of-way really the extra right away narrows down so we've got to take a look at that but maybe we'll can come up with something where if we have to narrow it, I think we use that language on the other project um that we did on Hicks Road not too long ago, so We will look at that. Um and then we've also been asked by quite a few of the commissioners
to to talk to the community development department. to see what opportunities there are. We are obviously close to the schools. great opportunity for teacher housing to see what different ideas we could have and what programs might be available that the client could uh research and evaluate. So those are their our working items. Did I catch everything, Commissioner?
Jack MarianoVice ChairDid great. Um So I think it's very important for infrastructure to be in place as the school comes in. I don't expect them to do everything, but at least around their property connecting to this two schools. If we're gonna move up the density this much, I think it's appropriate to ask for it now. Uh I'm glad you bring it up because it's obviously it'll come up later, but this gives you time to actually work with the school board, work with our staff. I'm comfortable if staff thinks they can give them uh impact fee credits for bill nuts path
the extra distance, that's fine. Um but I think it's something that's that's gonna be critical for that area to have it. I don't expect 'em do all the shoulders on them but at least it's it's this one phase, if we're gonna go this way, then let's make it as best we can for the kids because right beside it is industrial property to the south. That industrial property be trucks right around. If they have a place to go in the northern part, they can connect from one school to the other. So whether teachers live there, firefighters, first responders, everybody can walk back and forth to the school, get back
from there, get there safely. And if you can work with the school if they need a a turn lane in which will make it safer for them to get the traffic in there, that that's great. So I appreciate you covering that stuff. And I know we're not gonna get to detail with it now, but as long as staff hears those things, they can prepare for it and and w and work with them on it.
Kathryn StarkeyChairUm Commissioner Oakley, I agree when I had my meeting with them I also noted the connection opportunity there to the Suncoast Trail and I don't know if there's an opening there but certainly we should work to have a pedestrian opening there and as this neighborhood fills in kids could easily ride their bikes to school and employees. Um it's not their property to the north, but I wonder what the school district uses that That a
that entrance off of Corella Four. Did they mention that at the Planning Commission? I listened to it but I don't know if I don't recall them saying what What that's right. To the elementary school? Whenever I've gone there, I've always come in off of Shady Hills. Yeah, my understanding is
Barbara Wilhiteeverybody comes in off of Shady
Kathryn StarkeyChairHills. Yeah. Traffic. um for the school. So I'm not sure So maybe there's an opportunity to partner with the school district on Getting from that corner up. We definitely will meet with them in person. Yeah. Okay, anybody else have any questions? I think it's a great location for what you're doing. So uh is there anyone in the public here that wishes to speak to this item? Do we have anyone online? We have no one online for this item.
Jack MarianoVice ChairI'll
Kathryn StarkeyChairtake
Jack MarianoVice Chairthe
Kathryn StarkeyChairmotion.
Jack MarianoVice ChairSeeing no one, more approval. Second. Second.
Kathryn StarkeyChairUh all in favor? Aye. I will call Sari.
Ron OakleyDistrict one, Commissioner Oakley. I script. District two, Commissioner Oakley. District four, Commissioner Fitzpatrick. Aye. District five, Commissioner Oriano. Aye. District three, Chairman Starkey. Aye. Okay, P seventy two. Item P seventy two was published in the Tampe Times on July twentieth, twenty twenty two.