Skip to main content
Pasco Countymeeting record

PDD-22-7640

Published agenda

Heard once, at the Planning Commission on Sep 1, 2022.

No final outcomeThe minutes show no disposition for any appearance of this case. That is a gap in the record, not a decision.

Official title

Zoning Amendment (Consent) – Anmar Builders Inc/Creala Estates – Change in Zoning from an A-R Agricultural-Residential District to a MF-1 Multiple-Family Medium Density District – Northwest Pasco County – North Side of Shady Hills Road, East of Softwind Lane – Containing Approximately 19.231 Acres

Every appearance1 of 1 are in a recording

TranscriptWhat was said at each appearance is below it. Machine transcription, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 85% of 85 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.

  1. 1
    Planning CommissionPC4Public hearingNo disposition in the minutes
    Open this item →
    11m
    Unidentified speakerVoice A

    Okay. Okay, and then um that would be the complete list of continuances. Yes. You want me to introduce the consent? Pardon me? Shall I introduce the consent agenda?

    GreyChair

    Yes, the consent that's we're finished with continuance, is right?

    Unidentified speakerVoice A

    Yes. Okay. Uh item PC four is a zoning amendment in the name of Anmar Builders Inc. slash Krella estates. Uh it is a change in zoning from an AR agricultural residential district to a MF1 Multiple Family Medium Density District in northwest Pasco County on the north side of Shady Hills Road, east of Softwind Lane, containing approximately nineteen point two acres.

    Mm-hmm. Mr. Chairman I need you to pull that

    GirardiVice Chair

    out

    Moody

    of conflict.

    GreyChair

    We have a conflict or are you on me

    Moody

    to pull it? Well, y you do need to pull it so that you can vote on it separately because

    GreyChair

    you've

    Moody

    got to refuse themselves.

    Unidentified speakerVoice A

    Okay, all

    right.

    Um is that the only one consent? And then uh for your information, Mr Chairman, based on what we know, um there are no speakers signed up for P five and P seven. If if the Planning Commission desires, they might put those on consent. Otherwise we're prepared to give a presentation a as part of the regular agenda.

    GreyChair

    Yeah, let's go ahead and put those on consent then.

    GirardiVice Chair

    I'd like to hear P7.

    GreyChair

    Oh you would like to? Okay. So we're gonna pull P4. And B seven,

    Moody

    is that right? Well P seven's on regular anyway. Yeah. Okay. So I think if you wanna move P five to consent, you should do a motion to move it to consent.

    GirardiVice Chair

    So moved.

    Moody

    Shall I read P five?

    GreyChair

    Okay, we have a motion and second. Any further discussion? Moving P five to consent?

    Unidentified speakerVoice A

    Mr. Chairman Mariano. Shall I read P five for the record? Well he's

    Moody

    also gonna have to ask if anybody's here

    Unidentified speakerVoice A

    for

    Moody

    P5 to

    Unidentified speakerVoice A

    Yeah, just

    saying Terry.

    Okay. Uh P five is a zoning amendment, MJW Group Inc. slash Viceroy Apartments. It's a change in zoning from an MF2 multiple family high density district to an MF3 multiple family high density district in southwest Pasco County, west side of Wood Trail Boulevard. Approximately 175 feet north of Old County Road 54, containing approximately 2.8 acres, and this comes with a recommendation to approve.

    GreyChair

    Okay, is there any is the applicant present? Anybody here to object?

    Did I hear somebody? Yeah, Barbara is the applicant. She I think Oh, okay. I don't see anyone here to object. Is there anybody online on this one?

    Liam Devine

    There's no one online, Chairman

    GreyChair

    M okay. Barbara, there's nobody here to object. You have any comment?

    Unidentified speakerVoice B

    Why?

    GreyChair

    I'm not sure I understood what she said. She said she does not. Okay. I thought she had a lot.

    She has a lot of comments on the consent. Okay. I think we got problems. All right, you got three minutes. Okay. Um Okay, so let's uh have a motion on that please.

    Unidentified speakerVoice C

    Motion to approve the consent agenda item PC five. Second.

    Chris Williams

    So I have a question. Sorry. So what's on the consent now?

    GreyChair

    Fine.

    Chris Williams

    Just just five.

    Moody

    Well, technically four is on the consent agenda, but you have to vote on it separately. Correct. So all we're Okay.

    The motion was for PC five. Yes.

    GreyChair

    All right. So and any further discussion on the motion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed, like, sign? Okay, so we have to go back to PC four I guess. Yes.

    Do we have a motion on

    Moody

    PC four? I just wanna make sure we did ask for if anybody was here for

    Liam Devine

    I did. Okay. Yeah. Would you like a staff presentation on this one or or on PC four? On PC four.

    GreyChair

    Um it's on consent. Is there anybody is the applicant present? Anybody here to object?

    Anyone here to object? I I d I see no objections, so d would the board like to hear it? I have a question and a comment. Okay. Let's hear it then.

    Chris Williams

    So so just um I know I've read through it, but also just just explain your comfort level with this density going in this particular area.

    Liam Devine

    Yeah, so they're actually having a deed restriction for 164 um townhomes. I know they have a conceptual already and I'm sure Barbara Willy can speak to that. Um the density um will be less. Um than some of our typical development, but I believe they're coming in around 153, 154, and I'm sure Barbara can correct me if I'm wrong here. So w staff is okay with the density, it's in compliance with the comp plan for density, um, and they're also doing a deed restriction.

    Chris Williams

    Okay. And then my comment was that we have asked um

    Um this uh developer to make sure they work with us on providing, which they have said they would, uh providing um pedestrian access to the because we have the elementary school site to the east and then we also have the uh middle school site to the north. So ensuring that there's pedestrian access to those schools.

    GreyChair

    All right.

    Barbara Wilhite

    I would just say that we'd probably get in contact with King and I did in contact uh with the board regarding uh those connections and how to best get our students to your schools. So we've already started that coordination and that will continue through site plan.

    Moody

    So Mr Williams, would you like staff to add a fine unit of fact that memorializes that? That would be great.

    Liam Devine

    Staff can do that.

    GreyChair

    Okay, do you need to restate it or are we good?

    Chris Williams

    Was uh I can restate it. So um we've asked the developer to work with us on providing pedestrian access both to the elementary school to the east and also to the uh middle school to the north.

    GreyChair

    Alright.

    All right, so the applicant is present. Did we have anybody else here to object or have questions?

    Chris Williams

    I'm sorry, I do have probably another comment or question. So I know there's some things 'cause we've been contacted from the developer to the south. Just to make sure they work with us on alignment with our elementary school entrance. to Mary Giella and just thoughts as to traffic in that area and I'm sure, you know, with traffic studies that would Show what is needed if any improvements are, but

    just any comments on on that.

    Liam Devine

    So I I will let the applicant speak to, you know, cross access and and how that will work. I I know the applicant has said to me and as you just stated that they um plan on providing um pedestrian cross access to the schools um through sidewalks. So I I if there's something traffic related that you have concerns with I'll defer to the applicant.

    Chris Williams

    Well just uh to the south I believe that's more of an industrial light.

    Liam Devine

    Correct.

    Chris Williams

    So they're talking about where to place their entrance into that development and coordinating with where our elementary school entrances are. But then just I assume industrial light wouldn't be particularly heavy as far as traffic, but just any From from I guess what I'm asking is I assume that this is being looked at from not only existing traffic but also this Corilla State's impact as well as the industrial impact to the

    south, just making sure of what improvements, if necess if any, might be necessary to Shady Hills Road here.

    Barbara Wilhite

    This is Barbara Wilhite. Can you hear me?

    GreyChair

    Yes.

    Barbara Wilhite

    Our access is to Corella Drive, um, ingress and egress. with Chakrela Drive and Shady Hills as a signalized intersection. We'll have emergency access to Shady Hills Road. We wouldn't have any driveway conflicts on Shady Hills Road relative to the other development in the area.

    Chris Williams

    I guess more my question is

    Any major improvements to this area? Are you all? Necessary. And there may not be. I'm just asking the question. Um I don't know if we have our Yeah, Steve Henry who did the analysis is here.

    Henry

    Good afternoon. Steve Henry, Linkson Associates, five oh two three, West Laurel, Tampa, three three six oh seven. I have not been sworn to

    GreyChair

    Honest man.

    Henry

    Do you swear

    Barbara Wilhite

    if I'm testimony or rather truth, so I'll be

    Henry

    back? So one we're we're actually doing the traffic study, have done the traffic study for the development to the south and uh so we're working with staff on the access for that and configuration and geometry for those and then in addition to this as this one comes in we'll be doing an access management analysis for this project and so we'll be able to look at both and make sure that there's no improvements necessary. Or what what's improvement we have to do?

    Chris Williams

    Yeah, that was my question.

    Henry

    Sure. Yes, thank you.

    Chris Williams

    Just wanna make sure all that was being looked at together. Okay. I would also

    Liam Devine

    I would like to add as well, we have our access management team online and they're listening to this now. So when that comes in for review, they'll be aware.

    Chris Williams

    Great. Thank you.

    GreyChair

    Alright. I think that's everyone. So uh do you have a motion?

    Christopher Poole

    Motion to approve with Chris's added uh finding effect.

    GreyChair

    We have a motion and a second. Any further discussion on the motion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed, like sign. And let the record reflect that Mr. Moody refused insult.

    Moody

    You

    GreyChair

    get that.