Zoning Amendment (Consent) – Anmar Builders Inc/Creala Estates – Change in Zoning from an A-R Agricultural-Residential District to a MF-1 Multiple-Family Medium Density District – Northwest Pasco County – North Side of Shady Hills Road, East of Softwind Lane – Containing Approximately 19.231 Acres
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Approve
No disposition in the minutes
The approved minutes do not say what became of this item. That is a gap in the record, not a decision. It is the normal state for 24% of items. Most of those are regular business and board reports that the minutes do not dispose of in writing. This archive never infers an outcome from the fact that someone called a vote.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, Sep 1, 2022
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Planning Commission, Sep 1, 2022
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PDD-22-7640 in full →Heard once. PDD-22-7640 appears on no other agenda in the archive.
- Sep 1, 2022PlanningPC4▶No disposition in the minutesthis item
What was said
Machine transcription of 11m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 85% of 85 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Okay. Okay, and then um that would be the complete list of continuances. Yes. You want me to introduce the consent? Pardon me? Shall I introduce the consent agenda?
Yes, the consent that's we're finished with continuance, is right?
Yes. Okay. Uh item PC four is a zoning amendment in the name of Anmar Builders Inc. slash Krella estates. Uh it is a change in zoning from an AR agricultural residential district to a MF1 Multiple Family Medium Density District in northwest Pasco County on the north side of Shady Hills Road, east of Softwind Lane, containing approximately nineteen point two acres.
Mm-hmm. Mr. Chairman I need you to pull that
out
of conflict.
We have a conflict or are you on me
to pull it? Well, y you do need to pull it so that you can vote on it separately because
you've
got to refuse themselves.
Okay, all
right.
Um is that the only one consent? And then uh for your information, Mr Chairman, based on what we know, um there are no speakers signed up for P five and P seven. If if the Planning Commission desires, they might put those on consent. Otherwise we're prepared to give a presentation a as part of the regular agenda.
Yeah, let's go ahead and put those on consent then.
I'd like to hear P7.
Oh you would like to? Okay. So we're gonna pull P4. And B seven,
is that right? Well P seven's on regular anyway. Yeah. Okay. So I think if you wanna move P five to consent, you should do a motion to move it to consent.
So moved.
Shall I read P five?
Okay, we have a motion and second. Any further discussion? Moving P five to consent?
Mr. Chairman Mariano. Shall I read P five for the record? Well he's
also gonna have to ask if anybody's here
for
P5 to
Yeah, just
saying Terry.
Okay. Uh P five is a zoning amendment, MJW Group Inc. slash Viceroy Apartments. It's a change in zoning from an MF2 multiple family high density district to an MF3 multiple family high density district in southwest Pasco County, west side of Wood Trail Boulevard. Approximately 175 feet north of Old County Road 54, containing approximately 2.8 acres, and this comes with a recommendation to approve.
Okay, is there any is the applicant present? Anybody here to object?
Did I hear somebody? Yeah, Barbara is the applicant. She I think Oh, okay. I don't see anyone here to object. Is there anybody online on this one?
There's no one online, Chairman
M okay. Barbara, there's nobody here to object. You have any comment?
Why?
I'm not sure I understood what she said. She said she does not. Okay. I thought she had a lot.
She has a lot of comments on the consent. Okay. I think we got problems. All right, you got three minutes. Okay. Um Okay, so let's uh have a motion on that please.
Motion to approve the consent agenda item PC five. Second.
So I have a question. Sorry. So what's on the consent now?
Fine.
Just just five.
Well, technically four is on the consent agenda, but you have to vote on it separately. Correct. So all we're Okay.
The motion was for PC five. Yes.
All right. So and any further discussion on the motion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed, like, sign? Okay, so we have to go back to PC four I guess. Yes.
Do we have a motion on
PC four? I just wanna make sure we did ask for if anybody was here for
I did. Okay. Yeah. Would you like a staff presentation on this one or or on PC four? On PC four.
Um it's on consent. Is there anybody is the applicant present? Anybody here to object?
Anyone here to object? I I d I see no objections, so d would the board like to hear it? I have a question and a comment. Okay. Let's hear it then.
So so just um I know I've read through it, but also just just explain your comfort level with this density going in this particular area.
Yeah, so they're actually having a deed restriction for 164 um townhomes. I know they have a conceptual already and I'm sure Barbara Willy can speak to that. Um the density um will be less. Um than some of our typical development, but I believe they're coming in around 153, 154, and I'm sure Barbara can correct me if I'm wrong here. So w staff is okay with the density, it's in compliance with the comp plan for density, um, and they're also doing a deed restriction.
Okay. And then my comment was that we have asked um
Um this uh developer to make sure they work with us on providing, which they have said they would, uh providing um pedestrian access to the because we have the elementary school site to the east and then we also have the uh middle school site to the north. So ensuring that there's pedestrian access to those schools.
All right.
I would just say that we'd probably get in contact with King and I did in contact uh with the board regarding uh those connections and how to best get our students to your schools. So we've already started that coordination and that will continue through site plan.
So Mr Williams, would you like staff to add a fine unit of fact that memorializes that? That would be great.
Staff can do that.
Okay, do you need to restate it or are we good?
Was uh I can restate it. So um we've asked the developer to work with us on providing pedestrian access both to the elementary school to the east and also to the uh middle school to the north.
Alright.
All right, so the applicant is present. Did we have anybody else here to object or have questions?
I'm sorry, I do have probably another comment or question. So I know there's some things 'cause we've been contacted from the developer to the south. Just to make sure they work with us on alignment with our elementary school entrance. to Mary Giella and just thoughts as to traffic in that area and I'm sure, you know, with traffic studies that would Show what is needed if any improvements are, but
just any comments on on that.
So I I will let the applicant speak to, you know, cross access and and how that will work. I I know the applicant has said to me and as you just stated that they um plan on providing um pedestrian cross access to the schools um through sidewalks. So I I if there's something traffic related that you have concerns with I'll defer to the applicant.
Well just uh to the south I believe that's more of an industrial light.
Correct.
So they're talking about where to place their entrance into that development and coordinating with where our elementary school entrances are. But then just I assume industrial light wouldn't be particularly heavy as far as traffic, but just any From from I guess what I'm asking is I assume that this is being looked at from not only existing traffic but also this Corilla State's impact as well as the industrial impact to the
south, just making sure of what improvements, if necess if any, might be necessary to Shady Hills Road here.
This is Barbara Wilhite. Can you hear me?
Yes.
Our access is to Corella Drive, um, ingress and egress. with Chakrela Drive and Shady Hills as a signalized intersection. We'll have emergency access to Shady Hills Road. We wouldn't have any driveway conflicts on Shady Hills Road relative to the other development in the area.
I guess more my question is
Any major improvements to this area? Are you all? Necessary. And there may not be. I'm just asking the question. Um I don't know if we have our Yeah, Steve Henry who did the analysis is here.
Good afternoon. Steve Henry, Linkson Associates, five oh two three, West Laurel, Tampa, three three six oh seven. I have not been sworn to
Honest man.
Do you swear
if I'm testimony or rather truth, so I'll be
back? So one we're we're actually doing the traffic study, have done the traffic study for the development to the south and uh so we're working with staff on the access for that and configuration and geometry for those and then in addition to this as this one comes in we'll be doing an access management analysis for this project and so we'll be able to look at both and make sure that there's no improvements necessary. Or what what's improvement we have to do?
Yeah, that was my question.
Sure. Yes, thank you.
Just wanna make sure all that was being looked at together. Okay. I would also
I would like to add as well, we have our access management team online and they're listening to this now. So when that comes in for review, they'll be aware.
Great. Thank you.
Alright. I think that's everyone. So uh do you have a motion?
Motion to approve with Chris's added uh finding effect.
We have a motion and a second. Any further discussion on the motion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed, like sign. And let the record reflect that Mr. Moody refused insult.
You
get that.