PDD-22-7641

Every appearance1 of 1 are in a recording

TranscriptWhat was said at each appearance is below it. Machine transcription, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 54% of 70 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.

1. 1Sep 22, 2022
   Planning CommissionPC4Public hearingNo disposition in the minutes

   Open this item →▶ Play from 27:51
   ▶ 27:519m1/2

   Denise

   27:51Following item is PC four. This is now on your consent agenda. It's a PDD 227641. It's a special exception in the name of Malicose Holdings. Malicose Holdings Duplexes. It's a special exception for duplexes in an R4, high density residential district. Comes to you with a recommendation of approval with conditions as included in your agenda packet. This will be three duplex units for a total of six dwelling units.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   28:18Okay, is the applicant present?

   28:22Is there anybody here to speak on this item? Anything else from up here?

   28:29Okay, we'll go to the next item then.

   Denise

   28:31Following item is PC five, PDD 22, C U27, Malicos Holdings, Malicos Holdings Duplexes. It's for the approval of vacation rental units in an R4 high density residential district. This is companion to item PC four. Um this comes to you with a recommendation of approval with conditions as included in your agenda packet.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   28:52Okay. Barbara you still here? Yeah. Anybody here to speak on this item? Right, anything else from up here? Okay, next.

   Denise

   29:03Following item is PC 6. That's PDD 227663. It's a zoning amendment. It's a Jordan and Jordan MPUD Master Plan Unit Development. A substantial modification in order to extend the expiration date of a previously approved MPUD. There's no changes in entitlements. The expiration date through this request will be extended to the year 24. 45 comes to you with a recommendation of approval with conditions as included in your agenda packet.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   29:33Okay, is the applicant present? Anybody here to speak on this item?

   29:39Uh don't hear any? Move on.

   Denise

   29:42Next item. Next, yep. Sorry, PC7 is PDD 227611. This is Remington MPUD Master Plan Unit Development, Sand Hill Flats LLC. This is for a rezoning request from an AC agricultural district to an MPUD Master Plan Unit Development District to allow a maximum of 120 single-family detached units on 44.2 acres. comes to you with a recommendation of approval with conditions. I do want to say on this one that there were several

   30:12ex parte communications which have been submitted to the clerk's office. Um and I should also say that about PC six and I apologize I didn't. It's for the same um members. Uh that is Chris Williams, Pete Hansel, Chris Poole, Chuck Gray, and Jamie Girardi. Those have all been um

   30:31Mm-hmm.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   30:32Okay, thank you.

   Denise

   30:34And comes to you with a recommendation of approval and with conditions as included in your agenda packet.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   30:39So is the applicant present? Anybody here to speak on that item? Okay You're you're on here on PC seven? Okay, so we'll need to go ahead and pull that item.

   Donald E. Anderson

   30:52And just to be clear, I think I had ex parte communications as well.

   Denise

   30:55Oh okay. Thank you so much for letting me know. Did we see that one? Thank you so much. Uh for PC six as well, Mr. Anderson.

   Donald E. Anderson

   31:03Yes.

   Denise

   31:03Okay. So uh PC six and PC seven, Mr. Anderson, and we'll get it to the clerk's office. I just don't remember seeing that one.

   Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

   31:12And I had for Remington.

   Denise

   31:14Yes. Oh you do. Okay. Yes. Thank you so much. I didn't s okay. So we will add um Mr. Moody as well for PC six and PC seven. Thank you. So I'll move on to PC eight. PC8 is PDD 227608. It's in the name of Campbell South Commercial LLC, Longleaf Groves MPUD. This is for a change in zoning from a C2. General Commercial District to an MPUD Master Plan Unit Development District to allow for a maximum of 95,000 square feet of

   31:44commercial retail, 15,000 square feet of office, and 350 multifamily apartments on approximately 36.861 acres. Comes to you with a recommendation of approval with conditions as included in your agenda packet. And for this one, we do have uh export day communication with uh John Moody. And that has been submitted to the clerk's office.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   32:07Denise, I I had ex parte uh communication on that one as well. Thank you so much.

   Unidentified speakerVoice B

   32:11And Denise, I did as well.

   Denise

   32:13Thank you.

   Unidentified speakerVoice B

   32:13I might just

   Denise

   32:15maybe they didn't come my way. Or may maybe because I was out for some time.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   32:18Okay.

   Denise

   32:19Okay. Thank you so much. I'm gonna note that and uh make sure that the clerk's office has received those.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   32:25Okay. Uh is the applicant present? Anybody here to speak on that item? Okay, so we'll keep that one on our consent.

   Denise

   32:35All right, and then the next uh the last item on your consent agenda is PC9, which is PDD 220565. This is this is a development agreement for the renter MPUD. And uh this development agreement is to provide for the design, right-of-way, dedication, and construction of Bexley Road slash the Wisteria Loop realignment improvements and to allow the developer to receive reimbursement in the form of mobile mobility fee credits. This comes here with a recommendation of approval.

   Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

   33:06Jamie, I'd like to pull that. I know there are people here that want to speak about that.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   33:10Okay, so we're gonna pull PC nine. And what about um?

   Denise

   33:15Yeah actually let's do the addendum, that's right. So we're gonna move on to to APC11, the addendum. It's PDD 220462. It's for a large-scale comprehensive plan amendment, C PAL 2206 for Saddlebrook Resort. It's for a large scale, and you're sitting on this one as a local planning agency, large scale comprehensive plan amendment creating sub-area policy flu 7.1.66. Creating future land use map 2-9, Sheet 66, amending future land use maps map 2-15

   33:46and sheet 22 from res 6, residential 6-dwell units for gross acre to PV plan development on approximately 420.47 acres of real property located south of State Road 54 and east of the service road. On this item, we're asking for you to find this consistent with a comprehensive plan and recommend approval to the BCC.

   Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

   34:07And I'd like to hear that case too.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   34:10Okay, so we'll pull uh we'll pull that one as well.

   Denise

   34:17Do you want uh Mr. Chair, do you want to appear this in the order that it was pulled with um Pale Collier being the last one?

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   34:24Yes, please.

   34:28Okay, so P C seven, P C nine, and P A P C eleven were pulled? So the consent agenda

   Donald E. Anderson

   34:37I'll make a motion for the consent agenda, including PC four, PC five, PC six, and PC eight with the associated conditions.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   34:46Okay. Motion and second. Any other discussion?

   Unidentified speakerVoice C

   34:59It's up.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   35:00Yeah, th there was a motion for approval for the consent agenda, which includes items PC four, PC five, PC six, And P C eight. There was a motion and a second. There's no other discussion. All in favor?

   Unidentified speakerVoice C

   35:15All right.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   35:16All opposed? Motion carries.

   35:22Okay, so we're gonna go back now to item someone had a question.

   Jon Moody

   35:29That was the consent agenda, ma'am.

   35:41Okay. The Chair did ask for public comment on P C four and PC five and they've already taking action on them. So it's up to the Planning Commission about whether you want to Move to reconsider to hear the additional comment.

   35:59Ma'am, you can't speak from the audience so it's

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   36:05The if with you back there the clerk can't catch what you're saying and she needs to have record of the conversation.

   Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

   36:16Well,

   Barbara Wilhite

   36:17Barbara Wilheite, can I go talk to them and see if they want them pulled and we can come back and if so, and then you can re do your motions to hear it?

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   36:25That's fine.

   Barbara Wilhite

   36:25We talk, see if we can answer any of their questions.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   36:27Okay.

   ▶ 1:25:23under a minute2/2

   Barbara Wilhite

   1:25:23I would just say on those two other items, we were able to meet with the residents and they have advised that you didn't need to rehear it. So

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   1:25:29excellent. Thank you. And that was on PC four and PC five? Correct.

   Barbara Wilhite

   1:25:32Yes.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   1:25:32Thank

   Barbara Wilhite

   1:25:32you for giving us that time.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   1:25:34Yep. Thank you.

   Barbara Wilhite

   1:25:35Mm-hmm.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   1:25:37So I guess the the item that's left on the agenda is P ten, is that correct?

   Chris Williams

   1:25:41Hold on the two that she just discussed for the right-of-way.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   1:25:44Well I think we already did. So there's no reason for the. You already voted

   Chris Williams

   1:25:46on

   Jon Moody

   1:25:47them. You would have to do that.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   1:25:48Leanne, hold on one second.

   Jon Moody

   1:25:49Thank you.