Special Exception (Consent) – Malacos Holdings Inc./Malacos Holdings Duplexes – Special Exception for Duplexes in an R-4 High Density Residential District – Northwest Pasco County – North Side of Clark Street, East of the Intersection of Clark Street and Aureau Avenue – Containing Approximately 0.21 Acre
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Approval with Conditions
No disposition in the minutes
The approved minutes do not say what became of this item. That is a gap in the record, not a decision. It is the normal state for 24% of items. Most of those are regular business and board reports that the minutes do not dispose of in writing. This archive never infers an outcome from the fact that someone called a vote.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, Sep 22, 2022
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Planning Commission, Sep 22, 2022
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PDD-22-7641 in full →Heard once. PDD-22-7641 appears on no other agenda in the archive.
- Sep 22, 2022PlanningPC4▶No disposition in the minutesthis item
What was said
Machine transcription of 9m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 54% of 70 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Taken up 2 times, not once through — set aside and returned to. Each stretch is below, in the order it happened.
1/2Taken up at 27:51
Following item is PC four. This is now on your consent agenda. It's a PDD 227641. It's a special exception in the name of Malicose Holdings. Malicose Holdings Duplexes. It's a special exception for duplexes in an R4, high density residential district. Comes to you with a recommendation of approval with conditions as included in your agenda packet. This will be three duplex units for a total of six dwelling units.
Okay, is the applicant present?
Is there anybody here to speak on this item? Anything else from up here?
Okay, we'll go to the next item then.
Following item is PC five, PDD 22, C U27, Malicos Holdings, Malicos Holdings Duplexes. It's for the approval of vacation rental units in an R4 high density residential district. This is companion to item PC four. Um this comes to you with a recommendation of approval with conditions as included in your agenda packet.
Okay. Barbara you still here? Yeah. Anybody here to speak on this item? Right, anything else from up here? Okay, next.
Following item is PC 6. That's PDD 227663. It's a zoning amendment. It's a Jordan and Jordan MPUD Master Plan Unit Development. A substantial modification in order to extend the expiration date of a previously approved MPUD. There's no changes in entitlements. The expiration date through this request will be extended to the year 24. 45 comes to you with a recommendation of approval with conditions as included in your agenda packet.
Okay, is the applicant present? Anybody here to speak on this item?
Uh don't hear any? Move on.
Next item. Next, yep. Sorry, PC7 is PDD 227611. This is Remington MPUD Master Plan Unit Development, Sand Hill Flats LLC. This is for a rezoning request from an AC agricultural district to an MPUD Master Plan Unit Development District to allow a maximum of 120 single-family detached units on 44.2 acres. comes to you with a recommendation of approval with conditions. I do want to say on this one that there were several
ex parte communications which have been submitted to the clerk's office. Um and I should also say that about PC six and I apologize I didn't. It's for the same um members. Uh that is Chris Williams, Pete Hansel, Chris Poole, Chuck Gray, and Jamie Girardi. Those have all been um
Mm-hmm.
Okay, thank you.
And comes to you with a recommendation of approval and with conditions as included in your agenda packet.
So is the applicant present? Anybody here to speak on that item? Okay You're you're on here on PC seven? Okay, so we'll need to go ahead and pull that item.
And just to be clear, I think I had ex parte communications as well.
Oh okay. Thank you so much for letting me know. Did we see that one? Thank you so much. Uh for PC six as well, Mr. Anderson.
Yes.
Okay. So uh PC six and PC seven, Mr. Anderson, and we'll get it to the clerk's office. I just don't remember seeing that one.
And I had for Remington.
Yes. Oh you do. Okay. Yes. Thank you so much. I didn't s okay. So we will add um Mr. Moody as well for PC six and PC seven. Thank you. So I'll move on to PC eight. PC8 is PDD 227608. It's in the name of Campbell South Commercial LLC, Longleaf Groves MPUD. This is for a change in zoning from a C2. General Commercial District to an MPUD Master Plan Unit Development District to allow for a maximum of 95,000 square feet of
commercial retail, 15,000 square feet of office, and 350 multifamily apartments on approximately 36.861 acres. Comes to you with a recommendation of approval with conditions as included in your agenda packet. And for this one, we do have uh export day communication with uh John Moody. And that has been submitted to the clerk's office.
Denise, I I had ex parte uh communication on that one as well. Thank you so much.
And Denise, I did as well.
Thank you.
I might just
maybe they didn't come my way. Or may maybe because I was out for some time.
Okay.
Okay. Thank you so much. I'm gonna note that and uh make sure that the clerk's office has received those.
Okay. Uh is the applicant present? Anybody here to speak on that item? Okay, so we'll keep that one on our consent.
All right, and then the next uh the last item on your consent agenda is PC9, which is PDD 220565. This is this is a development agreement for the renter MPUD. And uh this development agreement is to provide for the design, right-of-way, dedication, and construction of Bexley Road slash the Wisteria Loop realignment improvements and to allow the developer to receive reimbursement in the form of mobile mobility fee credits. This comes here with a recommendation of approval.
Jamie, I'd like to pull that. I know there are people here that want to speak about that.
Okay, so we're gonna pull PC nine. And what about um?
Yeah actually let's do the addendum, that's right. So we're gonna move on to to APC11, the addendum. It's PDD 220462. It's for a large-scale comprehensive plan amendment, C PAL 2206 for Saddlebrook Resort. It's for a large scale, and you're sitting on this one as a local planning agency, large scale comprehensive plan amendment creating sub-area policy flu 7.1.66. Creating future land use map 2-9, Sheet 66, amending future land use maps map 2-15
and sheet 22 from res 6, residential 6-dwell units for gross acre to PV plan development on approximately 420.47 acres of real property located south of State Road 54 and east of the service road. On this item, we're asking for you to find this consistent with a comprehensive plan and recommend approval to the BCC.
And I'd like to hear that case too.
Okay, so we'll pull uh we'll pull that one as well.
Do you want uh Mr. Chair, do you want to appear this in the order that it was pulled with um Pale Collier being the last one?
Yes, please.
Okay, so P C seven, P C nine, and P A P C eleven were pulled? So the consent agenda
I'll make a motion for the consent agenda, including PC four, PC five, PC six, and PC eight with the associated conditions.
Okay. Motion and second. Any other discussion?
It's up.
Yeah, th there was a motion for approval for the consent agenda, which includes items PC four, PC five, PC six, And P C eight. There was a motion and a second. There's no other discussion. All in favor?
All right.
All opposed? Motion carries.
Okay, so we're gonna go back now to item someone had a question.
That was the consent agenda, ma'am.
Okay. The Chair did ask for public comment on P C four and PC five and they've already taking action on them. So it's up to the Planning Commission about whether you want to Move to reconsider to hear the additional comment.
Ma'am, you can't speak from the audience so it's
The if with you back there the clerk can't catch what you're saying and she needs to have record of the conversation.
Well,
Barbara Wilheite, can I go talk to them and see if they want them pulled and we can come back and if so, and then you can re do your motions to hear it?
That's fine.
We talk, see if we can answer any of their questions.
Okay.
2/2Taken up again at 1:25:23
I would just say on those two other items, we were able to meet with the residents and they have advised that you didn't need to rehear it. So
excellent. Thank you. And that was on PC four and PC five? Correct.
Yes.
Thank
you for giving us that time.
Yep. Thank you.
Mm-hmm.
So I guess the the item that's left on the agenda is P ten, is that correct?
Hold on the two that she just discussed for the right-of-way.
Well I think we already did. So there's no reason for the. You already voted
on
them. You would have to do that.
Leanne, hold on one second.
Thank you.