PDD-23-0497

Every appearance1 of 2 are in a recording

Each appearance carries the official title above. Where the county’s wording changed, the change is marked: added and removed. Steps with no marks were worded identically.

TranscriptWhat was said at each appearance is below it. Machine transcription, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 56% of 32 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong. 1 of the 2 appearances are not in any recording, so what was said at those is not here.

1. 1Aug 3, 2023
   Planning CommissionPC7Consent agendaNo disposition in the minutes

   Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Consent) … Douglas-KD52 - Providing for Transmittal of the Proposed a Text Amendment to the … Subarea and Subarea Map 2-9(22a) 2- 9(22a) Gateway Hub Subcategories

   Open this item →▶ Play from 47:03
   ▶ 47:034m

   Charles GreyChair

   47:03Okay, and we have PC seven, I believe.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   47:08Sick.

   Charles GreyChair

   47:10Six yeah. Didn't we approve seven?

   47:15Seven.

   Denise

   47:15Yeah, PC seven will be presented by Chris Dimanche.

   Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

   47:20Okay. And I don't need a full presentation, I just have a question. Um my question is When I read the staff report So if you only look at the strike through and underline and sub-air policies, it makes it look like we're losing 120 acres of employment. I don't think that's really the case because I think they're eliminating some of the residential in the interstate mixed use area, but I thought staff was going to do some kind of discussion

   47:50about why we're not losing employment land Which I didn't see in the agenda memo.

   47:57I I think there is an explanation. I I want to be clear. I'm I'm supporting the amendment of the Complan. I'm just I d it seems like there's an analysis missing. From the staff report that shows why we're not losing one hundred and twenty acres of employment.

   Unidentified speakerVoice B

   48:11Do you mind

   48:14we should put it in the staff report at any stage?

   Unidentified speakerVoice C

   48:17Yes. Yeah, the uh Nictoria Squito's Planning Development Department, there

   48:21is

   48:21an answer for that. Um we could put it in the staff report. I think probably the best person that can speak to it off the top of his head extemporaneously is gonna be Clark Copy himself. But essentially the the employment generating uses and the capacity. capacity that the original Gateway Hub had or has currently will remain thereafter.

   Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

   48:42I I think here I I'm not disagreeing with you, but if you if you just look at the table it looks like we're losing 120 acres and I thought there was gonna be some analysis that we're gonna do.

   Unidentified speakerVoice C

   48:52We can we can augment that in the next iteration of the month.

   Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

   48:56Okay, well does does somebody want to explain it to the

   Unidentified speakerVoice B

   48:58Planning Commission just so we they all know? Sure, again Clark Hobby for the record. So uh and I some of you will I've sent emails and try to explain this, but basically the portion of the property that's along I 75 was I think four hundred and thirty-six acres originally, but it was a mixed use category and it allowed I think twenty-five percent to be Residential and in discussions with David and planning staff, we felt it was more important to preserve that area

   49:28for employment generating uses because we're intending on building, you know, hopefully a couple of million square feet of light industrial and office over in that area. So we netted out and removed the residential from that area. So the overall area that's Called now Interstate Employment and Mixed Use removed all residential from it. So it went down in gross acreage, but it's the exact same amount of employment generating uses and it ended up preserving all of the

   49:58highway frontage along seventy five in that category for employment only, not not residential. So we should probably caught that in the staff report out.

   Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

   50:08I mean that's consistent with what I my understanding, but it just I never saw the math in the staff report that explains all that.

   Unidentified speakerVoice B

   50:14The maps in there but yes, and also this is something else. The strike through and the maps are only an exhibit to the res to the resolution, not to the staff report. And I think that was also probably a little bit confusing. Uh it's hard to tell what's going on if you just look at the staff report. So I'll get with Amy and Terry and very quickly try to augment those two things so it's clear what we're doing. And I we're happy to if we need to create updated maps to bubble the area that's changing, we can do that. Okay,

   50:45thank you. All right,

   Charles GreyChair

   50:47thank you.

   Unidentified speakerVoice B

   50:47Okay.

   Charles GreyChair

   50:48Any other questions? Uh D I think you pulled that one, didn't you, Dave? Yeah.

   Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

   50:53Yeah, I'm I can make I'm fine with it being approved as long as they're correcting the staff report to address that issue.

   Charles GreyChair

   51:00Okay, so do we have a motion? So

   Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

   51:03moved.

   Charles GreyChair

   51:04To approve. With that correction.

   51:11Okay, and do we have a second?

   Unidentified speakerVoice D

   51:13I'll second.

   Charles GreyChair

   51:14Any further discussion? All in favor? Signify by saying aye. Aye. Aye. Opposed? Like sign? Okay.

2. 2Aug 8, 2023
   Board of County CommissionersP68Public hearingApproved

   Approved minutes

   Approved the Public Hearing Consent Agenda which included Agenda items P65, P67, and P68.

   Open this item →No recording