Skip to main content
Pasco Countymeeting record

PDD-23-7656

Published agenda

3 appearances between Feb 15, 2023 and Apr 4, 2023, at 2 boards.

OutcomeApproved by the Board of County Commissioners on Apr 4, 2023
Approved Staff’s recommendation.

Official title

Zoning Amendment (Consent) - Evans Nursery Villages of Pasadena Hills Master Planned Unit Development - Galvin Harris Land Services - A Substantial Modification to the Evans Parcel F-1 MPUD to Rename it to Evans Nursery MPUD, and to Decrease The Geographical Land Area of The Non-Residential Village Center of a Portion Of Village F.

On a calendar

Feb 15, 2023Apr 4, 2023 · click a mark to jump to that appearance

Every appearance1 of 3 are in a recording

Each appearance carries the official title above. Where the county’s wording changed, the change is marked: added and removed. Steps with no marks were worded identically.

TranscriptWhat was said at each appearance is below it. Machine transcription, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 100% of 7 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong. 2 of the 3 appearances are not in any recording, so what was said at those is not here.

  1. 1
    Village of Pasadena Hills Planning and PolicyP2Public hearingNo disposition in the minutes

    Zoning Amendment (Consent) (Continuance) - Evans Nursery Villages … Modification to the Evans Parcel F-1 Nursery MPUD to Rename it to (f.k.a Evans Nursery MPUD, and to Parcel F-1) To Decrease The Geographical Land … Portion Of Village F.

    Open this item →No recording
  2. 2
    Village of Pasadena Hills Planning and PolicyP4Public hearingNo disposition in the minutes
    Open this item →No recording
  3. 3
    Board of County CommissionersP57Public hearingApproved

    Zoning Amendment (Consent) - … Land Area of The Non-Residential Non- Residential Village Center of a Portion Of Village F. F

    Approved minutes

    Approved Staff’s recommendation.

    Open this item →
    1m
    Jack MarianoChair

    P fifty seven, which we would

    have to do.

    Joel

    Mr. Chairman, if I may, Joel two for the applicant and I was sworn. This the only question here is I understood it was exactly the same thing on the lane widths, because there is no park reduction deviation here. It was and there's no cul-de-sac deviation, so it was only the lane width item which you addressed on Pasadena, to my knowledge, unless the commissioner has another issue.

    Seth Weightman

    No, I just I I pull them together. just for future discussion I support the project as this item as is and just moving forward uh have the discussion on language for utility uh utility vehicles but I I do support item fifty seven.

    Jack MarianoChair

    Okay that wasn't consent. Is anyone from the audience on P 57 opposed to it? Anyone on Webex?

    Madam Clerk

    I only had Mr. Tu signed up.

    Jack MarianoChair

    Move approved. Motion is second. All in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Motion passes. Thank you all. Thank you. All right, that takes care of the consent agenda.