PDD-23-7656
Published agenda3 appearances between Feb 15, 2023 and Apr 4, 2023, at 2 boards.
Approved Staff’s recommendation.
Official title
Zoning Amendment (Consent) - Evans Nursery Villages of Pasadena Hills Master Planned Unit Development - Galvin Harris Land Services - A Substantial Modification to the Evans Parcel F-1 MPUD to Rename it to Evans Nursery MPUD, and to Decrease The Geographical Land Area of The Non-Residential Village Center of a Portion Of Village F.
On a calendar
Feb 15, 2023 → Apr 4, 2023 · click a mark to jump to that appearance
Every appearance1 of 3 are in a recording
Each appearance carries the official title above. Where the county’s wording changed, the change is marked: added and removed. Steps with no marks were worded identically.
TranscriptWhat was said at each appearance is below it. Machine transcription, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 100% of 7 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong. 2 of the 3 appearances are not in any recording, so what was said at those is not here.
- 1
Zoning Amendment
(Consent)(Continuance) - Evans Nursery Villages … Modification to the EvansParcel F-1Nursery MPUDto Rename it to(f.k.a EvansNursery MPUD, and toParcel F-1) To Decrease The Geographical Land … Portion Of Village F.Open this item →No recording - 2Open this item →No recording
- 3
Zoning Amendment (Consent) - … Land Area of The
Non-ResidentialNon- Residential Village Center of a Portion Of VillageF.FApproved minutes
Approved Staff’s recommendation.
1mJack MarianoChairP fifty seven, which we would
have to do.
JoelMr. Chairman, if I may, Joel two for the applicant and I was sworn. This the only question here is I understood it was exactly the same thing on the lane widths, because there is no park reduction deviation here. It was and there's no cul-de-sac deviation, so it was only the lane width item which you addressed on Pasadena, to my knowledge, unless the commissioner has another issue.
Seth WeightmanNo, I just I I pull them together. just for future discussion I support the project as this item as is and just moving forward uh have the discussion on language for utility uh utility vehicles but I I do support item fifty seven.
Jack MarianoChairOkay that wasn't consent. Is anyone from the audience on P 57 opposed to it? Anyone on Webex?
Madam ClerkI only had Mr. Tu signed up.
Jack MarianoChairMove approved. Motion is second. All in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Motion passes. Thank you all. Thank you. All right, that takes care of the consent agenda.