Skip to main content
Pasco Countymeeting record
P57ApprovedPublic hearingPublished agenda

Zoning Amendment (Consent) - Evans Nursery Villages of Pasadena Hills Master Planned Unit Development - Galvin Harris Land Services - A Substantial Modification to the Evans Parcel F-1 MPUD to Rename it to Evans Nursery MPUD, and to Decrease The Geographical Land Area of The Non- Residential Village Center of a Portion Of Village F

Public Hearings at 1:30 p.m.PDD-23-7656District 1

What the county recorded

Published agenda

Staff recommendation

Approval with Conditions

Approved minutes

DispositionApproved

Approved Staff’s recommendation.

The source document

Published agenda

The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Apr 4, 2023

The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.

Approved minutes

The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Apr 4, 2023

The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.

This case, across meetings

PDD-23-7656 in full →

PDD-23-7656 was taken up 3 times between Feb 15, 2023 and Apr 4, 2023 — this is appearance 3.

  1. Feb 15, 2023PlanningP2No disposition in the minutes
  2. Mar 15, 2023PlanningP4No disposition in the minutes
  3. Apr 4, 2023BoardP57Approvedthis item

What was said

Transcript

Machine transcription of 1m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 100% of 7 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.

Read it in the meeting →
MarianoChair

P fifty seven, which we would

have to do.

Joel

Mr. Chairman, if I may, Joel two for the applicant and I was sworn. This the only question here is I understood it was exactly the same thing on the lane widths, because there is no park reduction deviation here. It was and there's no cul-de-sac deviation, so it was only the lane width item which you addressed on Pasadena, to my knowledge, unless the commissioner has another issue.

Weightman

No, I just I I pull them together. just for future discussion I support the project as this item as is and just moving forward uh have the discussion on language for utility uh utility vehicles but I I do support item fifty seven.

MarianoChair

Okay that wasn't consent. Is anyone from the audience on P 57 opposed to it? Anyone on Webex?

Madam Clerk

I only had Mr. Tu signed up.

MarianoChair

Move approved. Motion is second. All in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Motion passes. Thank you all. Thank you. All right, that takes care of the consent agenda.