Skip to main content
Pasco Countymeeting record

PDE-25-0020

Published agenda

4 appearances between Oct 8, 2024 and Dec 10, 2024 — continued 1 time.

OutcomeAdopted by the Board of County Commissioners on Dec 10, 2024
Approved to adopt by a roll call vote.

Official title

An Ordinance By The Pasco County Board Of County Commissioners Amending The Pasco County Land Development Code; Section 604 Northeast Pasco Rural Protection Overlay District; Figure 604-1 Northeast Pasco Rural Protection Overlay District Boundary; Figure 604-2 Northeast Pasco Rural Scenic Roadways; Figure 604-4 Limits To Topographic Alterations; And Other Sections, As Necessary, For Internal Consistency; Providing For Applicability; Repealer, Severability; Inclusion Into The Land Development Code, And An Effective Date.

On a calendar

Oct 8, 2024Dec 10, 2024 · click a mark to jump to that appearance

Every appearance3 of 4 are in a recording

TranscriptWhat was said at each appearance is below it. Machine transcription, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 77% of 71 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong. 1 of the 4 appearances are not in any recording, so what was said at those is not here.

  1. 1
    Board of County CommissionersP45Public hearingNo disposition in the minutes
    Open this item →No recording
  2. 2
    Board of County CommissionersP58Public hearingContinued
    Approved minutes

    Approved to continue the item to the December 10, 2024 Board of County Commissioners meeting at 1:30 p.m. in New Port Richey.

    Open this item →
    1m
    Madam Clerk

    Prefer publication, P-58, Tampa Bay Times, July the 28th, 2024, and September the 18th, 2024.

    Unidentified speakerVoice A

    Uh item P58 is PDE 250020 is a land development code amendment to increase the Northeast Pasco County Rural Protection Overlay. A continuance of the adoption hearing is being requested to the December 10th, 2024 Board of County Commissioners meeting at 1 30 PM in Newport Ritchie. This item was affected by the cancellation of the 10-824 BCC meeting. To further note, P62 on this agenda is the first reading of this item.

    Mariano

    Mr. Chairman? Yes. So this is a northeast Pasco rural and you want to have it in Newport Ritchie? Should we have it should sh should have it over here?

    Unidentified speakerVoice A

    Um I think it's just updating the land development code to match a comprehensive plan amendment that's happening. I think is the plan amendment happening I think in Dade City? The first reading of the of the Plan Amendment is here in in Dade City, right now. It's gonna be happening later. So the land development code just to be needs to be modified to match what's happening in that comprehensive plan amendment.

    Mariano

    Move to continue time, so

    OakleyChair

    I got a motion on a second. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. Motion passed 5-0. Uh P 59.

  3. 3
    Board of County CommissionersP62Public hearingNo action
    Approved minutes

    No action required as this was the first Public Hearing. The adoption hearing was scheduled for the December 10, 2024 Board of County Commissioners meeting at 1:30 p.m. in New Port Richey.

    Open this item →
    7m
    Madam Clerk

    Publication Tampa Bay Times October twenty-seventh, twenty twenty four.

    OakleyChair

    No action is required.

    Unidentified speakerVoice A

    Correct. Uh item P D E twenty five zero zero two zero is an ordinance by the Pasco County Board of County Commissioners amending the Pasco County Land Development Code. Section six oh four Northeast Pasco Rural Protection Overlay District. Figure six oh four dash one Northeast Pasco Rural Protection Overlay District Boundary. Figure six oh four dash two Northeast Pasco Rural Scenic Roadways. Figure six oh four dash four limits to t topographic alterations and other sections as necessary for interpretation. Internal consistency providing for applicability or repealer separability, inclusion into the land development code, and an effective date. Uh this

    comes to you with a recommendation to accept public comment. There is no action required by the Board of County Commissioners at this as this is the first of the two public hearing. The second hearing, which is the adoption hearing, will be held December tenth, twenty twenty four at one thirty P. M. in Newport Ritchie. A presentation is available.

    Cindy Terrapani

    Okay. Does anyone sign up for presentation? No one is signed up. Does anyone in the audience wish to speak to this item?

    StarkeyVice Chair

    What's funny?

    OakleyChair

    CMO You want to speak to this item?

    StarkeyVice Chair

    Sixty two, right?

    OakleyChair

    Come forward?

    You speak today, you can not speak no.

    Unidentified speakerVoice B

    This is she gets two shots at this one. Oh two

    OakleyChair

    shots on this one. Okay. I'm taking that back.

    Nancy Hazelwood

    All right. Nancy Hazelwood [address removed] Um, I'd just like to request a short synopsis of what is involved in this particular ordinance. Thank you.

    Unidentified speakerVoice A

    And that should be covered in the presentation.

    StarkeyVice Chair

    because I I don't think anyone's talking.

    Unidentified speakerVoice A

    Amy Heiler's coming up to give that. Thank you. Okay. Here we go.

    Amy Heiler

    Good afternoon. Amy Heiler with Planning Development and Economic Growth. I can go ahead and go through the presentation just to give you a summary. So, this is the companion to the comprehensive plan amendment that was just adopted. What's happening is this is adding 41 acres to the northeast rural area. The amendment that you just adopted amended various maps that these were impacting. The issue or the challenge that occurred was that this proposal. proposal was in conflict with the urban

    service area and the rural area. So this is just the LDC companion amendment to make sure it's all clean between the two uh guiding documents.

    Unidentified speakerVoice B

    Except they didn't adopt the plan amendment, they continued it.

    Amy Heiler

    Uh the one that was just adopted by roll call vote previously to this the RAGE parcel.

    Unidentified speakerVoice B

    Oh, okay. Gotcha.

    Amy Heiler

    Yep. Okay, so properties located in the North Market area. Here's your aerial view. So this is what's what we're calling the rage parcel. It's 41 acres off of Bellamy Brothers. It's a modification to simply just the figures of 6041, 6042, and 6044. What we're doing is with these figures, we're going to add the 41 acres to the figures that are embedded into the Northeast Roll 604 code,

    land development code.

    Mm ch Okay, so they were heard together on 822. Uh the accompanying RAGE parcel was an amendment from res 3 to res 1. Uh the reason why they were going from res 3 to res 1 was to allow for a minor rural subdivision. Um so again, this is just the companion to that. So this is 6041. We added the 41 acres to this visual or this figure. Here's the area that was added. So

    we're going to go to the right-of-way.

    StarkeyVice Chair

    I'm sorry, can you go back? Sure. It's hard to do.

    Amy Heiler

    So it's on the bottom uh far right hand or far left hand corner. So this is the original existing figure. And then the forty one acres have been added or requesting to be added. So it's just the corner. Yeah. Yeah, little little corner on the side or on the bottom.

    OakleyChair

    Okay.

    Amy Heiler

    Uh this is the existing figure uh 6042 for the scenic roadways. And we've also added and extended the scenic roadways so they will be subject to those sections of the code. And then this is your existing limits to the topographic alterations.

    StarkeyVice Chair

    Okay,

    Amy Heiler

    so

    StarkeyVice Chair

    they're so now they have to follow

    Amy Heiler

    Yep. Okay. All Yeah, so these are so this is now the L D C component of it. Okay. So because they're added, excuse me, added into the land development code for the Northeast Rural Protection Area, they are now following or secondary. And just for

    StarkeyVice Chair

    some of our new people, can you Do you c are you able to quote what those rules are that we put in place?

    Amy Heiler

    Uh about

    StarkeyVice Chair

    the topograph topo Topographical?

    Amy Heiler

    Uh not off the top of my head.

    StarkeyVice Chair

    The height.

    Is that

    Amy Heiler

    not the same thing? Yeah, uh you can't see it here, but in the legend, uh you'll see the slope grades and so they're gonna have to honor those slope grades. So they can't impact those slopes.

    Yeah, like in Claremont they sold off their hills. And we didn't want that to happen here. Yeah.

    Um you will also notice that based on the topographic changes. So this map was previously altered in two thousand and twenty three, so this is another rendition to it. Um so some of the data have actually changed based on the contours. And so you notice the green areas uh in the uh previously existing one. So this is the updated map which shows that there's uh uh substantial change in some of the slope areas in the center of the map. So they will have to be bound by that. But the forty-one acres is not impacted

    by these contours.

    Okay. All right. So then with that we accept public comment. And happy to answer any other questions.

    OakleyChair

    So no one's on that. We've already had one person to speak now. Does anyone else wish to speak to this item?

    Yep, come forward.

    Name name

    Unidentified speakerVoice C

    and address. Good afternoon. My name is Lynn Johnson with the Johnson Pope Law Firm. I represent the applicant, the Rage family. Just by way of further explanation, this whole process that we've gone through for for quite some time with staff's help is simply to build an additional house. There's one house on 41 acres. We want to build another house for the son. That's that's what this whole thing has been about. Oh okay. Any questions I could have all

    right. Thank you so much. Thank you.

    OakleyChair

    All right, no action today. So we'll move on to uh P63.

  4. 4
    Board of County CommissionersP82Public hearingAdopted
    Approved minutes

    Approved to adopt by a roll call vote.

    Open this item →
    2m
    Unidentified speakerVoice D

    Uh we have proof of publication of P eighty two of In the Tampa Bay Times, October twenty-seventh of twenty twenty four.

    OakleyChair

    Thank you, Madam Chair. Uh item P eighty two is PDE twenty five zero zero two zero. This is an ordinance by the Pasco County Board of County Commissioners, amending the Pasco County Land Development Code, Section 604, Northeast Pasco Rural Protection Overlay District, Figure 604-1, Northeast Pasco Rural Protection Overlay District Boundary, Figure 604-2, Northeast Pasco Rural Scenic Roadways. Figure 604-4 limits to topographic alterations and other sections as necessary for internal consistency, providing for

    applicability, repeal, or severability, inclusion to land development code, and an effective date.

    This proposed ordinance to amend the land development code was first heard on November 12th, 2024. Uh that was the first hearing. This is the second hearing. Therefore Uh the recommended board action is to accept public comment and adopt the proposed ordinance amendment by roll call vote and authorize the chair to execute the ordinance amendment. This is a land development code amendment that is a companion to a recent future land use map amendment that was approved at November 12, 2024, Board of Commissioner's

    meeting. Thank you.

    StarkeyVice Chair

    Okay. Board members, any questions?

    Okay, is there anyone from the

    Four on one. Do we want to have a motion?

    Unidentified speakerVoice D

    I mean, second.

    StarkeyVice Chair

    Roll call vote.

    Unidentified speakerVoice D

    District One Com uh Commissioner Oakley.

    StarkeyVice Chair

    Aye.

    Unidentified speakerVoice D

    District two, Commissioner Weightman. District 4, Commissioner Yeager. District 5, Commissioner Mariano. Aye. District 3, Chairman Starkey.

    Unidentified speakerVoice B

    Aye. And just for the record, that was moving staff's recommendation to the item. Yes.

    StarkeyVice Chair

    Okay. We'll take more of those.