An Ordinance By The Pasco County Board Of County Commissioners Amending The Pasco County Land Development Code; Section 604 Northeast Pasco Rural Protection Overlay District; Figure 604-1 Northeast Pasco Rural Protection Overlay District Boundary; Figure 604-2 Northeast Pasco Rural Scenic Roadways; Figure 604-4 Limits To Topographic Alterations; And Other Sections, As Necessary, For Internal Consistency; Providing For Applicability; Repealer, Severability; Inclusion Into The Land Development Code, And An Effective Date.
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
No Action Required
DispositionNo action
No action required as this was the first Public Hearing. The adoption hearing was scheduled for the December 10, 2024 Board of County Commissioners meeting at 1:30 p.m. in New Port Richey.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Nov 12, 2024
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Nov 12, 2024
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PDE-25-0020 in full →PDE-25-0020 was taken up 4 times between Oct 8, 2024 and Dec 10, 2024, continued 1 time — this is appearance 3.
- Oct 8, 2024BoardP45No disposition in the minutes
- Nov 12, 2024BoardP58▶Continued
- Nov 12, 2024BoardP62▶No actionthis item
- Dec 10, 2024BoardP82▶Adopted
What was said
Machine transcription of 7m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 82% of 50 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Publication Tampa Bay Times October twenty-seventh, twenty twenty four.
No action is required.
Correct. Uh item P D E twenty five zero zero two zero is an ordinance by the Pasco County Board of County Commissioners amending the Pasco County Land Development Code. Section six oh four Northeast Pasco Rural Protection Overlay District. Figure six oh four dash one Northeast Pasco Rural Protection Overlay District Boundary. Figure six oh four dash two Northeast Pasco Rural Scenic Roadways. Figure six oh four dash four limits to t topographic alterations and other sections as necessary for interpretation. Internal consistency providing for applicability or repealer separability, inclusion into the land development code, and an effective date. Uh this
comes to you with a recommendation to accept public comment. There is no action required by the Board of County Commissioners at this as this is the first of the two public hearing. The second hearing, which is the adoption hearing, will be held December tenth, twenty twenty four at one thirty P. M. in Newport Ritchie. A presentation is available.
Okay. Does anyone sign up for presentation? No one is signed up. Does anyone in the audience wish to speak to this item?
What's funny?
CMO You want to speak to this item?
Sixty two, right?
Come forward?
You speak today, you can not speak no.
This is she gets two shots at this one. Oh two
shots on this one. Okay. I'm taking that back.
All right. Nancy Hazelwood [address removed] Um, I'd just like to request a short synopsis of what is involved in this particular ordinance. Thank you.
And that should be covered in the presentation.
because I I don't think anyone's talking.
Amy Heiler's coming up to give that. Thank you. Okay. Here we go.
Good afternoon. Amy Heiler with Planning Development and Economic Growth. I can go ahead and go through the presentation just to give you a summary. So, this is the companion to the comprehensive plan amendment that was just adopted. What's happening is this is adding 41 acres to the northeast rural area. The amendment that you just adopted amended various maps that these were impacting. The issue or the challenge that occurred was that this proposal. proposal was in conflict with the urban
service area and the rural area. So this is just the LDC companion amendment to make sure it's all clean between the two uh guiding documents.
Except they didn't adopt the plan amendment, they continued it.
Uh the one that was just adopted by roll call vote previously to this the RAGE parcel.
Oh, okay. Gotcha.
Yep. Okay, so properties located in the North Market area. Here's your aerial view. So this is what's what we're calling the rage parcel. It's 41 acres off of Bellamy Brothers. It's a modification to simply just the figures of 6041, 6042, and 6044. What we're doing is with these figures, we're going to add the 41 acres to the figures that are embedded into the Northeast Roll 604 code,
land development code.
Mm ch Okay, so they were heard together on 822. Uh the accompanying RAGE parcel was an amendment from res 3 to res 1. Uh the reason why they were going from res 3 to res 1 was to allow for a minor rural subdivision. Um so again, this is just the companion to that. So this is 6041. We added the 41 acres to this visual or this figure. Here's the area that was added. So
we're going to go to the right-of-way.
I'm sorry, can you go back? Sure. It's hard to do.
So it's on the bottom uh far right hand or far left hand corner. So this is the original existing figure. And then the forty one acres have been added or requesting to be added. So it's just the corner. Yeah. Yeah, little little corner on the side or on the bottom.
Okay.
Uh this is the existing figure uh 6042 for the scenic roadways. And we've also added and extended the scenic roadways so they will be subject to those sections of the code. And then this is your existing limits to the topographic alterations.
Okay,
so
they're so now they have to follow
Yep. Okay. All Yeah, so these are so this is now the L D C component of it. Okay. So because they're added, excuse me, added into the land development code for the Northeast Rural Protection Area, they are now following or secondary. And just for
some of our new people, can you Do you c are you able to quote what those rules are that we put in place?
Uh about
the topograph topo Topographical?
Uh not off the top of my head.
The height.
Is that
not the same thing? Yeah, uh you can't see it here, but in the legend, uh you'll see the slope grades and so they're gonna have to honor those slope grades. So they can't impact those slopes.
Yeah, like in Claremont they sold off their hills. And we didn't want that to happen here. Yeah.
Um you will also notice that based on the topographic changes. So this map was previously altered in two thousand and twenty three, so this is another rendition to it. Um so some of the data have actually changed based on the contours. And so you notice the green areas uh in the uh previously existing one. So this is the updated map which shows that there's uh uh substantial change in some of the slope areas in the center of the map. So they will have to be bound by that. But the forty-one acres is not impacted
by these contours.
Okay. All right. So then with that we accept public comment. And happy to answer any other questions.
So no one's on that. We've already had one person to speak now. Does anyone else wish to speak to this item?
Yep, come forward.
Name name
and address. Good afternoon. My name is Lynn Johnson with the Johnson Pope Law Firm. I represent the applicant, the Rage family. Just by way of further explanation, this whole process that we've gone through for for quite some time with staff's help is simply to build an additional house. There's one house on 41 acres. We want to build another house for the son. That's that's what this whole thing has been about. Oh okay. Any questions I could have all
right. Thank you so much. Thank you.
All right, no action today. So we'll move on to uh P63.