PDE-25-0202
Published agenda6 appearances between May 21, 2025 and Aug 5, 2025, at 3 boards — continued 2 times.
Approved the Public Hearing Consent Agenda which included Agenda Items P39 and P40.
Official title
Development Agreement (Continuance) - Homes by West Bay, LLC. - To Design, Permit, Acquire Right of Way, and Construct a Portion of Kiefer Road and New River Boulevard in Exchange for Transportation Development Fee Credits in the Villages of Pasadena Hills
On a calendar
May 21, 2025 → Aug 5, 2025 · click a mark to jump to that appearance
Every appearance3 of 6 are in a recording
Each appearance carries the official title above. Where the county’s wording changed, the change is marked: added and removed. Steps with no marks were worded identically.
TranscriptWhat was said at each appearance is below it. Machine transcription, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 82% of 51 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong. 3 of the 6 appearances are not in any recording, so what was said at those is not here.
- 1
Approved minutes
Approved to continue the item to the June 18, 2025 Villages of Pasadena Hills Planning and Policy Committee meeting at 1:30 p.m. in Dade City.
Open this item →No recording - 21mUnidentified speakerVoice A
Okay, good afternoon Planning Commission members. Gianna German, Planning Development and Economic Growth. The only item that we have in continuance today is PC one, and you are sitting as a local planning agency for this item. Item PC one is PDE 25-0202, a development agreement in the name of Homes by West Bay LLC, and a continuance to the July 10th, 2025 Planning Commission meeting at 1.30 p.m. in Dade City is being requested.
GreyChairOkay, this is the only continuance request. Uh do I hear our motion? Is this is the applicant present? Anyone here to object? Okay, I hear a motion.
Christopher PooleSo moved.
GreyChairSecond. We have a motion to approve uh the the uh the uh staff's recommendation. Any further discussion? All in favor signify by saying aye. Aye,
Moodyaye,
GreyChairopposed, like, sign. Okay
- 3
Development Agreement
(Continuance)(Consent) - Homes by West … Villages of Pasadena HillsOpen this item →No recording - 4
Development Agreement
(Continuance)(Consent) - Homes by West … Villages of Pasadena Hills1mMoodyOkay, so item PC three, we're gonna pull item PC two. Okay. Um item PC two, excuse me, item PC three, you will be sitting as a local planning agency. PDE twenty five zero two zero two, a development agreement in the name of Homes by West Bay L L C to allow for the developer to design, permit, acquire right of way, and construct a portion of Kiefer Road? and New River Boulevard in exchange for transportation development fee credits in the village of Pasadena Hills. And this is coming with the
recommendation that the local planning agency recommend approval of the development agreement to the Board of County Commissioners.
GreyChairOkay, so that's a consent request?
MoodyYes, sir.
GreyChairAll right. And th is there anybody here to speak on this one? Is the applicant present? Anyone here to object?
Connected CityMove approval of the consent agenda consisting of PC three.
Unidentified speakerVoice BSecond.
GreyChairWe have a motion and a second uh to approve uh the uh Consent? Do we have uh any objections? All in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed, like, sign? Okay.
- 5
Approved minutes
Approved to continue to the August 5, 2025 Board of County Commissioner meeting at 1:30 p.m. in Dade City.
Open this item →No recording - 6
Development Agreement
(Continuance)(Consent) - Homes by West … Villages of Pasadena HillsApproved minutes
Approved the Public Hearing Consent Agenda which included Agenda Items P39 and P40.
6mAmy HeilerOkay. Uh item P thirty-nine. Yep.
StarkeyChairWe have proof of publication of this item in the May seventh, twenty twenty five edition of the Tampa Bay Times.
Amy HeilerThank you. So item P thirty-nine is PDE twenty-five-0202. It's a development agreement in the name of Homes by West Bay LLC to design, permit, acquire right-of-way, and construct a portion of Kiefer Road and New River Boulevard in exchange for transportation development features. credits in the villages of Pasadena Hills. This comes with a recommendation of approval.
StarkeyChairClarification of the approved publication that was for the July 15th, 2025 edition or 2020 June, July 2015, Board of County Commissioners meeting where it was continued to tonight.
Amy HeilerThank you. Okay, I'll go with the next consent item, P forty, which is PDE.
Unidentified speakerVoice CIs there anybody at
StarkeyChairYes, and I ha I just have a quick question. Um and then we'll see if there's someone that has public comment. Um I was told in my meeting that there was a multi-use trail path on this road, but There is no road section and I know it calls for typical some typical road sections. I just don't have those memoirs.
There it is. It's that ginormous one.
Planning and Development staffWilliam Vermillion Planning Development Economic Growth. This is the one forty two AA typical phase one. This is for Kiefer. Has the uh the multi or the the sidewalks in the first portion and then the seventy AA that will be internal to the development for New River Boulevard with the eight foot multi use paths.
StarkeyChairRight. Can you go back to the other one for a second? I'm just so curious. Is is this is this like one day gonna be three lanes each way? Is I mean why do we have a twenty nine foot landscape area?
Planning and Development staffThis will be a total of four lanes in the future and those sidewalks will be expanded to twelve feet into the landscape area.
StarkeyChairOh I'm just looking here. They're only five feet. Th there's no multi use path on this?
Planning and Development staffFor for phase one. Yes, ma'am. It the roads to be developed in two phases. This is just the first roadway typical section that was adopted in V OPH. And so the second phase of this widens both sidewalks as well as to the four lane. And
StarkeyChairthat makes no sense to me. Why are we putting why are we gonna come in and tear up a sidewalk? Why aren't we putting the multi-use path down one side? There's plenty of room. Why would we tear something up? And make make it so that you cannot cycle somewhere.
Planning and Development staffSure, there there is the bike lanes within this typical section which is
StarkeyChairAre you gonna let your kids ride in that bike lane?
If I if
Planning and Development staffI if I had to do that.
StarkeyChairYou gonna put your baby stroller in that bike lane?
Planning and Development staffIt no. If I had kids, no. Uh unfortunately this is the the phasing that's set out within the enabling document of the V O P H Planning and Policy Committee.
StarkeyChairI never noticed that Did that no one ever catch that there's no multi use path on this when we have ten, fifteen, thirty-five feet of right away, which someone crossing the street's gonna literally have to run.
That is thirty ten thirty f twenty thirty forty forty five forty five feet when you start to cross I mean literally you're gonna have to run across the street.
Unidentified speakerVoice DMadam Chair, if I might. Yeah.
MarianoVice ChairCould we just pull this and bring Bring it back.
Unidentified speakerVoice DI don't think there's anybody else here, so might as well just get it out. Uh Clark Hobby, Hobby and Hobby One O Nine North Breast Street, Tampa, Florida. For your benefit, uh we are actually building the seventy AA on for Keefer with a twelve foot multi-use path. Okay,
StarkeyChairthis is the right now. This is the one four.
Unidentified speakerVoice DThat's just the typical we had to actually create A different cross section for Kiefer on this one, and it had to do with some of the constraints of the old right-of-way out there and where the school's right-of-way edge was. We're actually building it on this one, but you're raising a good issue in that. The that is the typical section that you see on the 142s and uh Mr. Uren has told us on several other projects, including Kenton and on uh McKendry,
that he would rather have the county pay us to go ahead and build both of the multi-use paths up front. So we're actually starting to do it and the county might want to look at the sections it uses. I don't disagree with you. I don't like the on street uh bike lanes myself. Um but that's what's in your comp plan, just so you know. Anyway, on this one we actually solved it working cooperatively with staff on it.
StarkeyChairIt's it's just it's such a wide tree s uh road um
Unidentified speakerVoice Dcross section.
StarkeyChairCross section. I I I don't know where I've ever seen this. Really it's I don't know how we came up with this, but
Unidentified speakerVoice DWell, I think uh Mr. Urin is looking at maybe reducing a number of these very wide ones, but he's also attuned to the multi use path issue also. Okay.
StarkeyChairUm when it gets widened to four, does it go to the inside or does it go to the outside? Because we have a thirty two feet on the inside. So, I mean Well you can line that thing with pickleball courts. Um What which way does it widen? Does anyone know?
Planning and Development staffGener behind the inside of the PC. Generally depending on the right-of-way constraints, it's at the inside.
StarkeyChairOkay. All right. Um
Right, so so is there anyone here who wishes to speak to this?
Leave it on consent. Then move on to the next.