PDE-25-7859

Every appearance1 of 2 are in a recording

Each appearance carries the official title above. Where the county’s wording changed, the change is marked: added and removed. Steps with no marks were worded identically.

TranscriptWhat was said at each appearance is below it. Machine transcription, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 93% of 95 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong. 1 of the 2 appearances are not in any recording, so what was said at those is not here.

1. 1Mar 6, 2025
   Planning CommissionPC2Consent agendaNo disposition in the minutes

   Zoning Amendment (Consent) – … Change in Zoning from an a ER-2 Estate-Residential District to an a E-R Estate-Residential District – … Containing Approximately 66.82 acres

   Open this item →No recording
2. 2Apr 9, 2025
   Board of County CommissionersP37Public hearingApproved

   Approved minutes

   Approved the Public Hearing Consent Agenda which included Agenda item P37.

   Open this item →▶ Play from 54:40
   ▶ 54:4010m

   StarkeyChair

   54:40All in favor? Aye. Aye. Okay.

   StarkeyChair

   54:46Item P thirty-seven?

   StarkeyChair

   54:48Yep.

   StarkeyChair

   54:48Okay, item P thirty seven was published in the Tampay Times on February nineteenth, twenty twenty-five and five twenty twenty-five and affidavit of certified mailings and site postings.

   Oakley

   54:58Item P thirty seven is PDE twenty-five seven eight five nine. This is a zoning amendment in the name of Saint Joe Locke Inc. Saint Joe Locke. It's a change in zoning from an ER2 estate residential district to an ER estate residential district in northeast Pasco County. South at the southeast corner of the intersection of Shardbour Road and St. Joe Road, containing approximately 66.82 acres. This comes to you with a recommendation of approval from the local planning or for the Planning Commission and from the Planning Home and Economic Growth Department.

   55:28There were two late expartes that were received from Commissioner Weightman and Commissioner Oakley. These expartes were emailed and received by the clerk's office. previous to this meeting.

   StarkeyChair

   55:41Um what's the difference between the ER two estate residential and the ER estate residential?

   Oakley

   55:47Essentially it's two and a half ER two is two and a half acre lots and ER is a one acre lot.

   Oakley

   55:53One acre lot. This has moved from two and a half acres to one acre lot.

   StarkeyChair

   55:59Any discussion?

   Oakley

   56:01Fuck it's not. Well yeah,

   StarkeyChair

   56:03but

   Oakley

   56:04you can still if if I can explain it a little better. Um between Saint Drew and um Saint Joe Road where it where it crosses at Sharber Road and Lake Isla Road and uh Jasmine Road and Curly Road meeting Saint Joe, there's two areas of interest here because The fact of it is this would go from two and a half acres to one acre tracks. But when we

   56:34were looking at the Northeast Rule and going through the advisory committee, my vision came out. that the area of St. Joe should be a small community center in that area that would service the people in the rural area around that. Um So in saying that, I have no problem with moving from the two and a half acre sites to the one acre sites and it's actually On the opposite side, the north side is a Catholic Church and a school on

   57:04the other side of the road there. The thought came up in looking at this the other day that possibility maybe two roundabouts, one at St. Joe and Jasmine and Curley, and one up at Lake Iola, Sharber, and St. Joe. aroundabout would tend to slow traffic down in this area and also because of the school there right next road on the north side and the church. And then the opposite side you'll have one acre sites.

   57:35With the possibility on a strip of land on the corner of Sharbour and Saint Joe, which is the

   StarkeyChair

   57:42Doing what on the corner?

   Oakley

   57:43Southeast, the corner of Saint Joe and Charter Road. There's a possibility that it can come some commercial. Which is across the

   StarkeyChair

   57:53old Saint

   Oakley

   57:53Joe

   StarkeyChair

   57:53store. You don't want it to be stripped out, right? But but to add neighborhood commercial.

   WeightmanSecond Vice Chair

   57:59But it's already there.

   StarkeyChair

   58:01Isn't that where that restaurant was that I always wanted to go to? Yeah, and that restaurant's coming back. That's a cute little commercial node there. Yeah. And that's why I say it's

   Oakley

   58:09a it's uh my vision is that that would be a community node that

   StarkeyChair

   58:13yeah

   Oakley

   58:13could be used this way so the one acre lots in in between Sharber and Curry would not be an issue because it's in within that community. And it would actually with a roundabout should slow down traffic. So roundabouts are not something we're voting on today, it's a possibility in the future.

   StarkeyChair

   58:33Well do you wanna take the corner and make make that C one?

   Oakley

   58:37Well, it's not part of this. Oh it's a separate Uh product uh property that will come to us later. So it's not something that would be done right now.

   StarkeyChair

   58:47You're talking about the north the east corner will come back? Because we're

   Oakley

   58:53No the southeast. The southeast corner.

   StarkeyChair

   58:56Is it not the southeast corner that we're rezoning today?

   Oakley

   59:00Yes.

   StarkeyChair

   59:01That's the southeast corner. Why not? If their intent is to M have that corner be commercial what well

   Oakley

   59:09I

   StarkeyChair

   59:09would be supposed

   59:09to be.

   59:10But that's not

   Oakley

   59:10here

   Oakley

   59:10today. Right. So w the proposal here is to go from ER two to ER, which is actually it's a little it's a little bit of a history involved in which one could argue that there was a scrivener's error in the previous zoning action that this should have always been ER. Nevertheless, they're only proposing what you see in the pink there to change the zoning back to ER. The commercial properties are located on the west side of um Lake Iowa. which is on the north side of St. Joe.

   59:41And so that's where I think the commissioner is referring to. We had lots of discussions over the years about how commercials should form up in the northeast Pasco County rural area. And uh in some of those previous conversations it was very limited applications of commercial in the existing locations. I think the commissioner, and correct me if I'm wrong, is Highlighting the fact that there's existing commercial at this intersection.

   Oakley

   1:00:08But also, and Terry doesn't know that yet. But it's also a possibility. But on the southeast corner. When they bring in that that property for zoning. You

   Oakley

   1:00:20mean the southwest

   Oakley

   1:00:21that it could be a commercial boat right on that corner too. On the southwest. So it makes all yeah, makes three corners commercial. Yes. See what I'm saying? Yes.

   StarkeyChair

   1:00:31Yeah. N but but not all four

   Oakley

   1:00:32commercials. It's just a separate

   StarkeyChair

   1:00:34I would make all

   Oakley

   1:00:35four commercials. It's like a village.

   StarkeyChair

   1:00:37But no strip centers. You don't want strips in a in village in a little village like

   Oakley

   1:00:43Yeah. But that's always Saint Joe's always been a community in the rural area. So It's

   StarkeyChair

   1:00:49like to bring a bike trail to it. You might hear. They travel that

   Oakley

   1:00:56route in there. We're

   Unidentified speaker

   1:00:57doing all right. Yeah. We'll

   StarkeyChair

   1:01:00work on that. Um this is um on consent, but is there anyone here wants to speak against this item? No one's on WebEx.

   MarianoVice Chair

   1:01:12Um you bring up a good point. So right along Saint Joe Road Are they putting a trail out in the front?

   StarkeyChair

   1:01:19Yeah, that there should be a place for a multi use path. That's a very travelled road.

   MarianoVice Chair

   1:01:25Surprised you didn't pick up on that. Well

   StarkeyChair

   1:01:27I think

   Oakley

   1:01:28um I

   StarkeyChair

   1:01:29think make

   Oakley

   1:01:29a road that goes by the RV park going on.

   StarkeyChair

   1:01:34Can you can you

   Oakley

   1:01:35underty one? might that might be a connection of the route For the bikes.

   StarkeyChair

   1:01:41Well if kids that live in the neighborhood and they want to get up to the neighborhood commercial there It would be good if they're not in the road riding their bikes. So what is But

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   1:01:53this is a straight rezoning and that would have to be addressed at site

   StarkeyChair

   1:01:58time and site

   1:01:58site. Another issue.

   Oakley

   1:02:00So

   1:02:01we'll deal with that next time. Um

   1:02:06make a motion that we get public comment? Second

   StarkeyChair

   1:02:08I there wasn't any.

   Oakley

   1:02:09Okay. I'll

   MarianoVice Chair

   1:02:10second.

   StarkeyChair

   1:02:11Okay. All in favor? Aye. Aye. Opposed? Okay. Okay, we are back to um Commissioner Weightman Um oh wait I wait guys I have one more question on the ADU. Um just wanna make sure we've covered all our bases. Uh do we have any architectural considerations of what people put in their yards?

   1:02:36Does it need to match if you're building a separate house, do you want it to match the vernacular of the house? Or can it be

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   1:02:44You're preempted.

   StarkeyChair

   1:02:46We're preemptive.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   1:02:47It should be. Okay, so there's a

   StarkeyChair

   1:02:49lot there you go, look what we just did.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   1:02:52Bring it on. it's gonna be the last legislative session they basically told you you couldn't regulate our own. So

   StarkeyChair

   1:03:00it can be

   Unidentified speakerVoice B

   1:03:03Lovely.

   1:03:05I may interrupt Terry Schrader, [address removed]. I appreciate your vote of confidence. I didn't want to say though because Terry pointed out it was a scribbers error and that's and this thing was lingering since two thousand and six. But also wanna just acknowledge your staff. They helped us through this to try to clean it up. So thank you very much. Okay.

   StarkeyChair

   1:03:22All right, great. Okay, um Commissioner

   1:03:28Um Yeager.

   Yeager

   1:03:33Yep. Well um first I would just like I know Sheriff Naco talked to you guys all separately. Um and he was talking about his helicopters and aviation.

   StarkeyChair

   1:03:47I started I don't go first. I started

   Yeager

   1:03:48the wrong place. That's what he was wondering.

   Oakley

   1:03:52Mr. Oakley. We're not we're changing all right. I mean you're chairman and you can't.

   StarkeyChair

   1:03:56Yeah, I'm just a little Not happy to be. Go ahead, Commissioner.

   Yeager

   1:04:01Okay, so I'm not going. Not yet. Okay.

   StarkeyChair

   1:04:04That was just a practice.

   Yeager

   1:04:08I know the guy in the middle.

   StarkeyChair

   1:04:09Commissioner

   Oakley

   1:04:10Weightman. You know that? This is when we had our trip up to uh Pallahassee. And we got a different folks that we we were able to meet with. Yeah Uh was this the second time? I w

   StarkeyChair

   1:04:26Yeah. 'Cause