PDE-26-7905

Every appearance1 of 2 are in a recording

TranscriptWhat was said at each appearance is below it. Machine transcription, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 91% of 88 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong. 1 of the 2 appearances are not in any recording, so what was said at those is not here.

1. 1Feb 5, 2026
   Planning CommissionPC8Public hearingNo disposition in the minutes

   Open this item →No recording
2. 2Mar 10, 2026
   Board of County CommissionersP57Public hearingApproved

   Approved minutes

   Approved Staff’s recommendation.

   Open this item →▶ Play from 23:27
   ▶ 23:2711m

   MarianoChair

   23:27So I think we should do a quick presentation, then we'll get to the citizen that had the qu has a question.

   23:35Well comment.

   Ebro Stevens

   23:42Good afternoon, Ebro Stevens, Planning Development and Economic Growth. Before you is PDE two six seven nine oh five, it is a zoning amendment. in the name of Neve's property.

   24:00The proposal is a Euclidean zoning amendment. The zoning is currently AC Agricultural District. and their applicant is wanting to change it to AR1, Agricultural Residential District. Future land use is res 1, residential one dwelling unit per gross acre. The Applicant proposes to develop the property in conformance with LDC Section 506 AR1 agricultural residential district standards for development. I

   24:30property is located on the west side of Hudson Lane, approximately 730 feet south of the intersection of St. Joe Road and Hudson Lane.

   24:42The property is in the north. Market Area and Rural Area One.

   24:50Here is a context map.

   24:56Aerial view.

   25:02As I mentioned, the Futureland used is Res1. To the northeast and south we have Res1. And to the west we have AGR, Agricultural Rural.

   25:14And zoning AC. To the north we have AC as well as AR, Agricultural Residential. To the east and south we have AR1 and AR, and to the west we have AC.

   25:29This subject site is undeveloped on approximately 12.61 acres. Access to the property is from Hudson Lane. It's a private owned and maintained residential roadway.

   25:43There is uh no conceptual trails identified on the St. Joe Road at this time. There is a conceptual trail corridor that was identified. on Darby Trails, approximately a mile south of the subject property. The applicant has agreed to record a deed restriction with a maximum of three dwelling units on the property, which is approximately 4.20 acres. And with that, staff recommends uh approve the zoning amendment, authorize a chair to execute one original resolution

   26:13provided and direct board records to distributes. I am happy to answer any questions.

   MarianoChair

   26:20No? Okay. Thank you.

   26:24All right, so this is time for public comment on the item. I have one person put her hand up. Come on up for ma'am.

   Starkey

   26:43Ma'am, if you would please your name and address for the record when you get to the podium and confirm that you were sworn.

   Debbie Richter

   26:50Um My name is Debbie Richter. Um, husband John. Uh we are on 1422-1 Hudson Lane. And uh my only question on this is something that was brought up at uh meeting before the last meeting uh was it was talked about proposed roads from these houses to um the

   27:20outside road and I was just wondering how that was going to be if it was going to be on the inside of the fence or if it was going to be on the outside which would be also um

   27:35Going on our Property. So I was just wondering about that.

   MarianoChair

   27:42Okay.

   27:45Uh would you repeat the question? I think staff's having trouble understanding it.

   Debbie Richter

   27:48Okay. Um as far as the pro the Neves property, um we are on the south side um of them on the entry into the woods and uh the question was on It was brought up at the meeting before about the proposed roads coming from the future

   28:21um dwellings where they were actually going to be um come out on.

   MarianoChair

   28:29Okay, so you're on you're to the south of the property, which is Hudson Lane, and you're about the access. What's gonna be for the folks coming in and out?

   Debbie Richter

   28:37Yeah. Yeah.

   MarianoChair

   28:39Yeah. All right. Thank you.

   Debbie Richter

   28:44And I was just inquiring how that Yeah. What? That plan was.

   MarianoChair

   28:50Okay.

   28:53Thank you. Anything else?

   Debbie Richter

   28:56Otherwise we would not like them to be coming on our property.

   MarianoChair

   29:00Okay.

   Amy Heiler

   29:05Amy Toll, Planning, Development, Economic Growth. The applicant's here to address that.

   29:11What she was explaining, the access points will be off of Hudson, um but it is an easement on their own. Hudson Lane. Hudson Road. Or Hudson Road. Hudson Road. Oh I see.

   29:22Yeah, Hudson Road. Um but she will go ahead. Hard to tell on the map. Okay.

   Barbara Wilhite

   29:26Yeah. Sure.

   Hudson Hudson Lane

   29:30Good afternoon. Aaron Dieves uh one zero five five one to Sarah Trace. Uh this is our property. Can you move the mic? Yeah, can you speak up a little bit? Sorry. It's okay. Um so Hudson Lane or I'm sorry, Hudson Road. is the the road that connects to Saint Joe. The easement for Hudson Road is what she's asking is on the outside of the fence of the current fence line. So from the current fence line that runs down Hudson, there's a twenty foot easement. in front of it. So the road

   30:00Hudson Road actually goes right down uh that fence line. So there's I'm not sure what Are you saying that the easement is on the road, not on the So the the current the current road that is there is not technically the easement. What was Long past. and paved at one point is actually on the neighbor across the road from us. It's actually on his property. So the easement actually runs right down our fence line. Saturney.

   30:31What

   30:31does

   Debbie Richter

   30:32that

   Starkey

   30:32mean?

   Hudson Hudson Lane

   30:34There you go. See how see how it kind of just winds through there? The easement is actually it's on the right hand side of that green property line. And that the the proposal for the um subdivision for that property is gonna be two properties in the back and then one in the front with flag lots. So there'll be a twenty, I think it's a twenty to thirty foot uh drive on the top right to get to the back and then on the bottom to

   31:05get to the back to the other. So there's no

   31:10Neighbors' properties.

   MarianoChair

   31:13So the existing road is Hudson Lane that you can access to that'll get you going north and south.

   Hudson Hudson Lane

   31:17Hudson Road. No

   MarianoChair

   31:18Hudson Hudson Lane.

   Hudson Hudson Lane

   31:19It's Hudson Lane. Oh. Oh uh

   MarianoChair

   31:22over there it says Hudson.

   Hudson Hudson Lane

   31:25It did.

   MarianoChair

   31:25Yeah, the other map.

   Hudson Hudson Lane

   31:26I do believe it's Hudson Lane though.

   MarianoChair

   31:29The one says Hudson Road. Road, going north south, and the other one to the center of the property, down to the south shows Hudson Lane. What is it?

   Mike Carballa

   31:39It's Hudson Lane. It appears to be Hudson Lane according to GIS.

   MarianoChair

   31:43Was the Scrivenus ever on the Hudson Road? Right. All right. So that road is a paved road or an unpaved road, but it's a road?

   Hudson Hudson Lane

   31:51It's Millings, asphalt millings.

   Oakley

   31:54Sure, yeah.

   31:58A twenty foot easement. Unimproved road. Wouldn't they have to improve that road to come to these three lots that are Proposing.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   32:10If it's a minor rural subdivision, your code requires a twelve foot

   32:16Um

   32:19Easement. Well it requires twelve foot Pavement rather than the full

   32:26Rather than a full twenty five feet or whatever. Okay. So they'll have to make that improvement before they sell these lots, right?

   32:35It may actually that would be an an engineering question, but it may actually meet that standard now if they've if they've got millings out there. But I you know Okay. All right.

   Amy Heiler

   32:47Uh I can address that, Amy Toll. Right now, um based on the timing and phasing and the access management. Um or substandard road application, excuse me. They're both exempt because it's only three lots right now. So they are exempt from improvements. All right. Thank you. They don't generate the trips to trigger it. Mr. Wayman?

   33:05Yes,

   Starkey

   33:06through the deed restriction.

   WeightmanVice Chair

   33:07Okay.

   MarianoChair

   33:08Okay.

   Starkey

   33:09Did um did she say all the access is gonna be from that Part where the two yellow dots are? Okay, one's gonna be from down around the corner?

   Hudson Hudson Lane

   33:21Nothing down around the corner. So where it comes up and to the to the right that prop that little chunk at the top. You gotta you gotta get to the microphone. Sorry. So above the two dots, there'll be one access road or driveway that basically follows that. uh property line to the back lot. And then just to the bottom of the two dots before that house that's there, the other flag lot will

   33:51go around that property line to the bat to the other back lot. Where's the third

   Starkey

   33:57lot?

   Hudson Hudson Lane

   33:57It comes right off of Hudson.

   Starkey

   34:00Okay. I just didn't know why they didn't access the one down here and not make a long flag lot.

   MarianoChair

   34:06Does someone have a pointer that she can actually show us?

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   34:16These are the Um where they're gonna take access and the and that is gonna c is gonna be at site plan um and the planning department will be required to make them meet code.

   Starkey

   34:29Okay. All right. I would say that we're going to be able to do that. You can

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   34:32ask questions, but I'm that's

   MarianoChair

   34:34uh

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   34:34I

   Starkey

   34:34guess you gotta take see if there's any more public comment then

   MarianoChair

   34:37uh I'll ask for any more public comment. Anyone else here to speak to this item?

   Starkey

   34:43Um I'm I'm sorry, Jack, did we resolve that lady's issue over there?

   MarianoChair

   34:47Yes. Well okay.

   Oakley

   34:48That was her occasion.

   MarianoChair

   34:51I do we have a motion for P fifty seven. Approval.

   Oakley

   34:54Second.

   MarianoChair

   34:55All in favor say aye. Aye. Aye.