Skip to main content
Pasco Countymeeting record
P57ApprovedPublic hearingPublished agenda

Zoning Amendment (Consent) –Nieves Property – Change in Zoning from an A-C Agricultural District to an AR-1 Agricultural-Residential District – North Central Pasco County – West Side of Hudson Lane Approximately 730 Feet South of the Intersection of St Joe Road and Hudson Lane – Containing Approximately 12.61 Acres

Public Hearings at 1:30 p.m.PDE-26-7905District 1

What the county recorded

Published agenda

Staff recommendation

Approve

Approved minutes

DispositionApproved

Approved Staff’s recommendation.

The source document

Published agenda

The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Mar 10, 2026

The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.

Approved minutes

The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Mar 10, 2026

The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.

This case, across meetings

PDE-26-7905 in full →

PDE-26-7905 was taken up 2 times between Feb 5, 2026 and Mar 10, 2026 — this is appearance 2.

  1. Feb 5, 2026PlanningPC8No disposition in the minutes
  2. Mar 10, 2026BoardP57Approvedthis item

What was said

Transcript

Machine transcription of 11m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 91% of 88 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.

Read it in the meeting →
MarianoChair

So I think we should do a quick presentation, then we'll get to the citizen that had the qu has a question.

Well comment.

Ebro Stevens

Good afternoon, Ebro Stevens, Planning Development and Economic Growth. Before you is PDE two six seven nine oh five, it is a zoning amendment. in the name of Neve's property.

The proposal is a Euclidean zoning amendment. The zoning is currently AC Agricultural District. and their applicant is wanting to change it to AR1, Agricultural Residential District. Future land use is res 1, residential one dwelling unit per gross acre. The Applicant proposes to develop the property in conformance with LDC Section 506 AR1 agricultural residential district standards for development. I

property is located on the west side of Hudson Lane, approximately 730 feet south of the intersection of St. Joe Road and Hudson Lane.

The property is in the north. Market Area and Rural Area One.

Here is a context map.

Aerial view.

As I mentioned, the Futureland used is Res1. To the northeast and south we have Res1. And to the west we have AGR, Agricultural Rural.

And zoning AC. To the north we have AC as well as AR, Agricultural Residential. To the east and south we have AR1 and AR, and to the west we have AC.

This subject site is undeveloped on approximately 12.61 acres. Access to the property is from Hudson Lane. It's a private owned and maintained residential roadway.

There is uh no conceptual trails identified on the St. Joe Road at this time. There is a conceptual trail corridor that was identified. on Darby Trails, approximately a mile south of the subject property. The applicant has agreed to record a deed restriction with a maximum of three dwelling units on the property, which is approximately 4.20 acres. And with that, staff recommends uh approve the zoning amendment, authorize a chair to execute one original resolution

provided and direct board records to distributes. I am happy to answer any questions.

MarianoChair

No? Okay. Thank you.

All right, so this is time for public comment on the item. I have one person put her hand up. Come on up for ma'am.

Starkey

Ma'am, if you would please your name and address for the record when you get to the podium and confirm that you were sworn.

Debbie Richter

Um My name is Debbie Richter. Um, husband John. Uh we are on 1422-1 Hudson Lane. And uh my only question on this is something that was brought up at uh meeting before the last meeting uh was it was talked about proposed roads from these houses to um the

outside road and I was just wondering how that was going to be if it was going to be on the inside of the fence or if it was going to be on the outside which would be also um

Going on our Property. So I was just wondering about that.

MarianoChair

Okay.

Uh would you repeat the question? I think staff's having trouble understanding it.

Debbie Richter

Okay. Um as far as the pro the Neves property, um we are on the south side um of them on the entry into the woods and uh the question was on It was brought up at the meeting before about the proposed roads coming from the future

um dwellings where they were actually going to be um come out on.

MarianoChair

Okay, so you're on you're to the south of the property, which is Hudson Lane, and you're about the access. What's gonna be for the folks coming in and out?

Debbie Richter

Yeah. Yeah.

MarianoChair

Yeah. All right. Thank you.

Debbie Richter

And I was just inquiring how that Yeah. What? That plan was.

MarianoChair

Okay.

Thank you. Anything else?

Debbie Richter

Otherwise we would not like them to be coming on our property.

MarianoChair

Okay.

Amy Heiler

Amy Toll, Planning, Development, Economic Growth. The applicant's here to address that.

What she was explaining, the access points will be off of Hudson, um but it is an easement on their own. Hudson Lane. Hudson Road. Or Hudson Road. Hudson Road. Oh I see.

Yeah, Hudson Road. Um but she will go ahead. Hard to tell on the map. Okay.

Barbara Wilhite

Yeah. Sure.

Hudson Hudson Lane

Good afternoon. Aaron Dieves uh one zero five five one to Sarah Trace. Uh this is our property. Can you move the mic? Yeah, can you speak up a little bit? Sorry. It's okay. Um so Hudson Lane or I'm sorry, Hudson Road. is the the road that connects to Saint Joe. The easement for Hudson Road is what she's asking is on the outside of the fence of the current fence line. So from the current fence line that runs down Hudson, there's a twenty foot easement. in front of it. So the road

Hudson Road actually goes right down uh that fence line. So there's I'm not sure what Are you saying that the easement is on the road, not on the So the the current the current road that is there is not technically the easement. What was Long past. and paved at one point is actually on the neighbor across the road from us. It's actually on his property. So the easement actually runs right down our fence line. Saturney.

What

does

Debbie Richter

that

Starkey

mean?

Hudson Hudson Lane

There you go. See how see how it kind of just winds through there? The easement is actually it's on the right hand side of that green property line. And that the the proposal for the um subdivision for that property is gonna be two properties in the back and then one in the front with flag lots. So there'll be a twenty, I think it's a twenty to thirty foot uh drive on the top right to get to the back and then on the bottom to

get to the back to the other. So there's no

Neighbors' properties.

MarianoChair

So the existing road is Hudson Lane that you can access to that'll get you going north and south.

Hudson Hudson Lane

Hudson Road. No

MarianoChair

Hudson Hudson Lane.

Hudson Hudson Lane

It's Hudson Lane. Oh. Oh uh

MarianoChair

over there it says Hudson.

Hudson Hudson Lane

It did.

MarianoChair

Yeah, the other map.

Hudson Hudson Lane

I do believe it's Hudson Lane though.

MarianoChair

The one says Hudson Road. Road, going north south, and the other one to the center of the property, down to the south shows Hudson Lane. What is it?

Mike Carballa

It's Hudson Lane. It appears to be Hudson Lane according to GIS.

MarianoChair

Was the Scrivenus ever on the Hudson Road? Right. All right. So that road is a paved road or an unpaved road, but it's a road?

Hudson Hudson Lane

It's Millings, asphalt millings.

Oakley

Sure, yeah.

A twenty foot easement. Unimproved road. Wouldn't they have to improve that road to come to these three lots that are Proposing.

Unidentified speakerVoice A

If it's a minor rural subdivision, your code requires a twelve foot

Um

Easement. Well it requires twelve foot Pavement rather than the full

Rather than a full twenty five feet or whatever. Okay. So they'll have to make that improvement before they sell these lots, right?

It may actually that would be an an engineering question, but it may actually meet that standard now if they've if they've got millings out there. But I you know Okay. All right.

Amy Heiler

Uh I can address that, Amy Toll. Right now, um based on the timing and phasing and the access management. Um or substandard road application, excuse me. They're both exempt because it's only three lots right now. So they are exempt from improvements. All right. Thank you. They don't generate the trips to trigger it. Mr. Wayman?

Yes,

Starkey

through the deed restriction.

WeightmanVice Chair

Okay.

MarianoChair

Okay.

Starkey

Did um did she say all the access is gonna be from that Part where the two yellow dots are? Okay, one's gonna be from down around the corner?

Hudson Hudson Lane

Nothing down around the corner. So where it comes up and to the to the right that prop that little chunk at the top. You gotta you gotta get to the microphone. Sorry. So above the two dots, there'll be one access road or driveway that basically follows that. uh property line to the back lot. And then just to the bottom of the two dots before that house that's there, the other flag lot will

go around that property line to the bat to the other back lot. Where's the third

Starkey

lot?

Hudson Hudson Lane

It comes right off of Hudson.

Starkey

Okay. I just didn't know why they didn't access the one down here and not make a long flag lot.

MarianoChair

Does someone have a pointer that she can actually show us?

Unidentified speakerVoice A

These are the Um where they're gonna take access and the and that is gonna c is gonna be at site plan um and the planning department will be required to make them meet code.

Starkey

Okay. All right. I would say that we're going to be able to do that. You can

Unidentified speakerVoice A

ask questions, but I'm that's

MarianoChair

uh

Unidentified speakerVoice A

I

Starkey

guess you gotta take see if there's any more public comment then

MarianoChair

uh I'll ask for any more public comment. Anyone else here to speak to this item?

Starkey

Um I'm I'm sorry, Jack, did we resolve that lady's issue over there?

MarianoChair

Yes. Well okay.

Oakley

That was her occasion.

MarianoChair

I do we have a motion for P fifty seven. Approval.

Oakley

Second.

MarianoChair

All in favor say aye. Aye. Aye.