Zoning Amendment (Continuance) – Steven Siller Tunnel to Tower/Parkway Boulevard– Change in Zoning from a PUD Planned Unit Development to a R-4 High Density Residential District – Southcentral Pasco County – on the South Side of Parkway Boulevard, Approximately .5 Miles East of Ehren Cutoff – Containing Approximately 75.15 Acres (PC: 4/1/21, 1:30 p.m.; DC Hybrid Virtual Meeting, BCC: 4/20/21, 1:30 p.m.; NPR Hybrid Virtual Meeting)
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Continuance Requested
No disposition in the minutes
The approved minutes do not say what became of this item. That is a gap in the record, not a decision. It is the normal state for 24% of items. Most of those are regular business and board reports that the minutes do not dispose of in writing. This archive never infers an outcome from the fact that someone called a vote.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, Apr 1, 2021
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Planning Commission, Apr 1, 2021
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PDD-21-7528 in full →PDD-21-7528 was taken up 7 times between Apr 1, 2021 and Jun 8, 2021, continued 2 times — this is appearance 1.
- Apr 1, 2021PlanningPC1▶No disposition in the minutesthis item
- Apr 20, 2021BoardP48▶Continued
- Apr 22, 2021PlanningP5▶No disposition in the minutes
- May 6, 2021PlanningPC1▶No disposition in the minutes
- May 18, 2021BoardP49▶Continued
- May 20, 2021PlanningP6No disposition in the minutes
- Jun 8, 2021BoardP82Approved
What was said
Machine transcription of 1m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 93% of 15 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
So I'm going to start at PC1, PDD 2017528, in the name of Stephen Siller, Tunnel to Tower, Parkway Boulevard. It's for change in zoning from an original PUD Plan Unit Development to an R4 high density residential district. The request is from the applicant to continue the item to the April 22nd, 2021 Planning Commission meeting at 130 in Newport Ritchie.
Okay. Uh is the applicant present?
The applicant is virtually present.
Okay. Anyone here to object to the continuance?
We have no one here to object on the continuance, nor have we received any letters in opposition to the continuance request.
Okay. Um does the applicant uh have any objection?
The applicant requested the continuance to April twenty second.
Right. Shall I have a motion, please?
Move to continue to April 22nd. Chris Williams.
Second. Chris Poole? Okay. We have a motion and a second. Any further discussion? All in favor of the motion signified by roll call.
You don't have to do a roll call because you have every single planning commission member here present with you. Oh
great.
So you could just do a a vote. And is that correct, David?
Yeah, so it's correct.
Okay, wonderful. Okay, so uh all in favor of the motion signifies by saying aye. Aye aye. Opposed? Okay, motion carried.