Skip to main content
Pasco Countymeeting record
P51ApprovedPublic hearingPublished agenda

Tiger Trail, PVAS No. 3393 (Consent) – Board of County Commissioners – Public Hearing – $137,239.00

Public Hearings at 1:30 p.m.PW-21-0026District 5

What the county recorded

Published agenda

Staff recommendation

Approve

Approved minutes

DispositionApproved

Approved Staff’s recommendation.

The source document

Published agenda

The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Jun 22, 2021

The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.

Approved minutes

The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Jun 22, 2021

The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.

This case, across meetings

PW-21-0026 in full →

Heard once. PW-21-0026 appears on no other agenda in the archive.

  1. Jun 22, 2021BoardP51Approvedthis item

What was said

Transcript

Machine transcription of 4m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 43% of 23 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.

Read it in the meeting →
StarkeyVice Chair

So for item uh P fifty one, um

Thank you.

Unidentified speakerVoice A

Here's the call at public works. Good afternoon, commissioners. Uh P Vest number Uh PW twenty one-zero zero three four. Can I have slides be?

Well s type a trail first, I'm sorry.

Um tiger Trail PVAS number three three.

We're doing Tiger Trail.

I I apologize. Tiger Trail, P PW twenty one dash zero two six and um PVAS number three three nine three. This is one road, it's non-counter maintained, the estimated costs. Is um one hundred and thirty seven thousand two hundred and thirty-nine dollars and thirty eight cents. The maximum cost per ERU is three thousand six hundred and twenty and thirty-two dollars and fifty nine cents. There's no discount in this project. Next, please. More

Of a possible 41 votes, 26 um returned their petition, which is 63%. 18 were in favor of the project, which is 69%. Eight were against the project, which is 31%. The annual installment is over a 15-year period and interest rate as advertised was uh 5%. Thanks. Uh this is a location map. We have um Peace Boulevard um to the south and little ranch. Um Little Ranch Road. Next please. Uh

just a couple of slides of the condition of the roads.

StarkeyVice Chair

Boat Road.

Unidentified speakerVoice A

If it was one screen.

Staff is recommended approved.

OakleyChair

Okay. Pleasure of the board.

StarkeyVice Chair

We had to have one individual who assigned it. One individual. Mm-hmm. Uh Janet Holoman. If you want to please um come up to the podium, you signed up for public comment on this item.

project engineer

Yeah.

Unidentified speakerVoice B

Good afternoon. I'm in favor of the project.

StarkeyVice Chair

Um we just need your name and address for the record, please.

Unidentified speakerVoice B

Janet Holliman, [address removed].

StarkeyVice Chair

Thank you. You may proceed.

Unidentified speakerVoice B

Can I go ahead now? Yes. Okay. I'm in favor of the project. I've lived out there for 38 years. When I moved out there, the subdivision called the Highlands had paved the road, but it was never maintained and it was never county owned. Um

My husband in 2012 suffered a stroke. We the ambulance couldn't even get down our road. because of the potholes. Seven months out of the year we cannot even access our yards because of the dust. The dust is terrible. So I'm in favor of the project and I would appreciate it if you would vote yes. Thank you.

Mariano

Mr Chairman Mariano. Yes, sir. Um I'd tell you when I when I look at the roads, the conditions, just knowing where there was, and I saw the amount of only thirty six thirty two to do it, I was amazed it was that cheap? When I see sixty-nine percent of the people supported, I'm gonna make a motion for approval.

OakleyChair

Second. Second. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. All opposed like sign? Motion passed by the right-of-way.