Skip to main content
Pasco Countymeeting record
P52ApprovedPublic hearingPublished agenda

Driftwood Village 2, PVAS No. 3434 (Consent) – Board of County Commissioners – Public Hearing – $522,349.00

Public Hearings at 1:30 p.m.PW-21-0034District 5

What the county recorded

Published agenda

Staff recommendation

Approve

Approved minutes

DispositionApproved

Approved Staff’s recommendation.

The source document

Published agenda

The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Jun 22, 2021

The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.

Approved minutes

The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Jun 22, 2021

The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.

This case, across meetings

PW-21-0034 in full →

Heard once. PW-21-0034 appears on no other agenda in the archive.

  1. Jun 22, 2021BoardP52Approvedthis item

What was said

Transcript

Machine transcription of 5m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 76% of 25 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.

Read it in the meeting →
OakleyChair

All right, we'll move on to P fifty two.

Unidentified speakerVoice A

Uh PW210034 Driftwood Village Bivas number 3434. There are seven roads in this project. They're counter maintained and pave. The estimated project cost is $522,349. And the maximum cost per ERU is $2,901.94. Uh the discounted amount is eighty five thousand five hundred and eighty-eight and twenty cents, and the maximum cost per ERU after the discount is two thousand four hundred and twenty-six thousand forty-five cents. Um

there were uh possible one hundred and eighty votes. Uh sixty-nine um were returned to us, which is equal to thirty-eight uh percent uh which responded to the petition. Of that was which was returned to us, thirty-seven or 54% was in favor, 32 or 4 uh or 46% was against. Um installment is over a 10 year period and the interest rate as advertised was 5%. Next please. Uh location map of Driftwood Village 2

A couple of photographs of the roads. He's saying it was advertised for the easy. Staff is recommended approved.

OakleyChair

Time to wild a Is anyone else here to speak to this item?

Unidentified speakerVoice B

Not unless the board directs them take.

OakleyChair

Come forward?

Yeah.

Yeah.

Name and address for the clerk.

Wendy Tingley

Thank you. My name is Wendy Tingley. I live at [address removed]. My home is one of the ones that's part of the assessment. I do not feel the paving assessment should go forward at this time. A couple of the reasons are the Homeowners Association did a massive, massive excavation project. on our old golf course. All of our streets were lined with dump trucks. We couldn't get out of our driveways to go to work. We drove across our lawns some days. They had to

do three point turns at the intersections of Water Oak, Island Pine, Salt Tree, all on Woodcrest Drive there. there were dozens of trucks a day lined up on Woodcrest Drive during the excavation project, to the point it was a problem for us. Excuse me. Another reason is the problem of poor patching of our potholes. I did send photos to show what's going on and it has been going on. And thankfully the public works operations

manager did reply to me and said he would handle the current ones. That doesn't address the two inch above the roadway that has been left by other pothole patches, which has caused a lot of our problems. The original ballot that was mailed that was mentioned earlier. was responded by thirty nine percent of our residents. That is not a majority of us. Several of the homes that I spoke to weren't even in the area in August of twenty twenty because they were still under restrictions

of COVID. I don't feel that that was a An accurate representation for our group where we live only because we have such a problem with those dump trucks and the garbage trucks doing those three-point turns. We have no control of that.

OakleyChair

Thank you. Yeah. Thank you for your comment. Mr.

Mm-

Commissioner Yeager.

Mariano

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Um You know, if if you look at this picture right here, this is very similar to Bear Creek. If you look how low that road is, it's below the gutters.

Michael Sala

Yeah.

Mariano

It's gonna keep tough for the water to get to those gutters, and that's what a lot of Bear Creek's problem was over time. When I look at this assessment at at only $2,400, it's extremely reasonable. Fifty-four percent of the people that did respond, meant enough to them to respond, I think it's a clear message they want it done. For those that are low income and can't afford it, they do have other ways they can help Defer the interest as far as this goes, so they can look at that if they have if anyone has trouble with that. But I'm gonna make move motion for approval.

Fitzpatrick

Thank you. My question is the Interest rate at the time says five point zero percent. Will it be the five point zero or the three point two five?

Unidentified speakerVoice A

At the time when it was advertised it's five percent. Um bear in mind the board has agreed that um the inf the law of the two prevailing interest rate when we actually put the um project if it passes approval When we actually quit on the tax rule we use. The law of the two.

OakleyChair

Thank you.

Unidentified speakerVoice A

Okay.

OakleyChair

All right, I have a motion and a second. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. Yeah, opposed like that. Okay. Motion passed 5-0. Now we move on to P53.