Zoning Amendment (Consent) – Clark Property MPUD Master Planned Unit Development – Robert J Clark Jr Trust, et al – A Rezoning Request from an A- C Agricultural, R-1 Rural Density Residential, ER-2 Estate Residential, and R- 1MH Rural Density Mobile Home Zoning Districts to an MPUD Master Planned Unit Development District to Allow for the Development of 410 Residential (Detached and Attached) Dwelling Units on 322.21 Acres

41:30One one

41:31six. Item P one sixteen was published in the Tampe Times on October thirteenth, twenty twenty-one.

41:39PDD 227570. This is Clark Property MPUD Master Plan Unit Development, Robert J. Clark Junior Trust and others. A rezoning request from AC Agricultural R1, Rural Density Residential, ER2, Estate Residential, and R1MH Rural Density Mobile Home District, to an MPUD Master Plan Unit Development District to allow for the development of 410 residential, detached, and attached. Dwelling units on 322.21 acres. Um the the item comes to you with a recommendation of

42:09approval with conditions. There is a modification to condition 28, which removes the term southern. It's your uh condition of approval 28, which is a page 7 to 14 of your conditions of approval, um, should be on the um the it has been provided, the correction has been provided to the clerk's office. Comes to you with a recommendation. of approval with conditions from the Planning and Development Department and the Planning Commission.

42:32Madam Chairman Mariano.

42:32Yes, Commissioner Mary.

42:33Uh question Denise on that. Just just reading that through. Does this in any way affect the dedication to the vision road that's on the southern part of the property?

42:41I do have my folks from transportation here who should be able to answer that question as to whether it affects the vision road. on th this particular condition has nothing to do with the Vision Road because it's actually the north end of the of the actual um development, which is Roach's Run. So I think what you're speaking of is the southern correct portion of the development?

43:03I just want to make sure there's no conflict there with that word southern. The southern

43:07has nothing to do with with the

43:09southern

43:09part. It has to do with the the northern end.

43:15All right. Is anyone else who wants to speak in opposition to this?

43:19No one has signed up to speak on this item and I've got a hand raised over there. Okay, and just let you know no one has on WebEx. Okay, so

43:26uh no just hang on one second. Well are you in are you rising in opposition to speak to this? Because then I'm gonna pull it off the consent agenda. Okay, so we'll pull P one one seven off the consent. One one six. I'm sorry, one one six. Okay. Um Okay, then we'll move on to one one seven.

49:17Okay, so we are now gonna go to one one six.

49:23Okay.

49:25So that was the gentleman that I I don't have him uh signed up for.

49:31The one with the hat on?

49:33Military hat.

49:34Uh the gentleman that stood Okay, are we gonna get a presentation first?

49:38Do you all want the presentation or

49:42I guess so. Yeah.

49:44All right.

49:47Mm.

49:47All right. We have the Clark property and P D, P D D twenty two seventy five seventy. No dog

49:53no you can sit down.

49:54Okay. Here is a location map. Uh we have Causeway Boulevard at the north and Bexley and Wisteria Loop at the south. Proposes a rezoning from AC Agricultural, R one Rural Density, ER two state residential, and R one M H rural density mobile home districts to an MPUD to allow for maximum I'm sorry that's a typo. It's four hundred ten residential dwelling units detached and attached on approximately three hundred twenty-two point two acres. No multifamily

50:24apartments are proposed in this project. Right.

50:28And here's a master plan. They have wetlands surrounding the whole thing. The development will have access to Causeway Boulevard to the north and will not have vehicular access to Bexley Road with Stereo Loop other than just an emergency-only access. The upland portions of the project in the southeast and southwest shall be preserved for open space, stormwater mitigation, as depicted on the master plan, and will not be developed because they will not have access to the northern roads. Uh there

50:59shall be a pedestrian sidewalk to Land O' Lakes High School on the northeast and to the conceptual planned Bexley-Westeria Trail on the south, as indicated on the master plan as well. There will be a mix of single family detached lot sizes, with 40 being the minimum, and at least 40% of the single family detached lots will be fifty feet wide and larger. And this proposed request is consistent with the Pasco County LDC and the applicable provisions of the Pasco County Comprehensive

51:29Plan. With that, the P D D recommends approval to the BCC with conditions. Right. And here comes the applicant.

51:43Commissioner Oakley, Clark Hobby, Hobby and Hobby PA 109 North Brest Street, Tampa, Florida have been sworn. I'll keep this brief. I think the commission commissioners are generally aware of this project. Uh our client is constructing a significant portion of a of a roadway called Causeway Boulevard out the north side of the project that's been problematic for 50 years. Uh we worked with the county staff for over a year to get the right-of-way in place so

52:13that we could take a substandard road, bring it, make substandard roadway improvements, build a new segment of it, and build new lanes to connect to Roaches Run. And we did that uh primarily because this is where the good marketing opportunity was for the project. it was a good thing for the county to have the roadway improvements and it avoided What We think our project probably could not go out the southern side because of some operational issues at Wisteria

52:44and 41. I'm going to reserve the balance of my time just to answer any questions that the neighbor may have. Thank you.

52:51Okay, will um will the gentleman who raised his hand please come up and name and address for the record?

52:57We're being serious. Yeah.

53:03Good

53:03afternoon, Madam Clerk and Board. My name is Gary Pete. I live at [address removed], which is on the back side of what the proposal is.

53:12And

53:12so you just

53:12have to state whether or not you've been sworn?

53:14Yes, I have.

53:15Thank you.

53:16Uh th I live on the back side of where the proposal is. I've gone out there in the morning purposely to look and see what the traffic is on forty forty one out there. And the traffic at six o'clock is bumper to bumper, from light to light, from the th past where the school is, there's three lights there. Past where the school is, they start out like rockets coming out of the out of the light. And it's bumper to bumper all the way up to the next light. My one neighbor told me that it took him three change or two changes of each light just to get to his work, which is further on. I have grandchildren

53:46that are gonna be going to that school, the Land O' Lakes School. I don't want that. With these number of homes that are gonna be here 300 some or excuse me, possibly 400, you're gonna have at least 500 more cars on that road during the week per morning and per afternoon. Right now it's not as big as fifty four. This lady's uh argument over here, I agree with her, but forty one's even worse at that point 'cause it's just two lines on each side. I suggest that you take a look at it again. I used to I'm retired now. I used to teach risk management. We got some risks there

54:17that I don't know if somebody's really taken a good look at. Thank you.

54:20So um just to comment, I would say we um we have some other north south roads coming in the area. W forty one won't be the only road to go north and south, so there is relief coming. Just so you know.

54:34Okay, thank you. Now one one last question. There will be no roads coming out onto Wisteria Loop, no exits.

54:41They only have an emergency exit onto Wisteria. What does that mean? If there if there's an accident that uh that blocks their entrance, then there can be um emergency exit through the back. It's a requirement that we have.

54:56Yeah, yeah. That'll be a game. The

54:59applicant can answer that one.

55:00Yeah, the applicant can answer that one.

55:01Thank you.

55:06You might want to call for anybody else, Jess.

55:08Yeah, is there anyone else wishing to speak to this? And do we have anyone online?

55:12We have no one online

55:13for

55:13this item.

55:15And we'll close public comment and let Mr. Hobby address

55:19Uh again, Clark Hobby for the record. I think I can answer these questions and I have Steve Henry here if there are any transportation questions, but we did a timing and phasing analysis, and there is adequate capacity on this stretch of uh 41. Obviously, the area is growing, and over time, there's a large area of research. In this area to the south of this project. We're only in Res III World, but there will be growth in the area, and we'd expect DOT to undertake analysis and widening as necessary over time

55:49in the area. We are not proposing fences along the south southerly border for the simple fact of almost all of the areas in which we're constructing homes and development are buffered by large wetland systems. And it we when we looked at the MPUD master plan briefly, as I think uh the chairman noted, or the chairwoman I should say, uh there are significant upland areas on the southerly boundary that we have agreed not to have any residential

56:20uses in. So there will be a large buffer through

56:27constructed upon and then the wetland systems that run along the southerly boundary of the property. Madam Chairman

56:33Mariano. Sorry. I think the question was on the emergency access.

56:39I can answer that as well. Again, we we do not propose any access on to Bexley or Wisteria. That would only be used in the event that our other access on causeway is totally blocked, so like emergency vehicles couldn't get in and out of the subdivision. That would only be a temporary condition. Okay, that is the right-of-way.

57:01Use it. I believe there's

57:03proposed to be a gate there.

57:05Okay. Okay, thank you.

57:09I see no move for second.