Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Consent) - CPAL 21-15 Gateway Hub - Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Future Land Use Element Appendix to the Gateway Hub Future Land Use Classification, and the Future Land Use Maps (Maps 2-9; Subarea Map 2-9 Gateway Hub Subcategory; Subarea Map 2-9 Gateway Hub Subcategories).
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Approve
No disposition in the minutes
The approved minutes do not say what became of this item. That is a gap in the record, not a decision. It is the normal state for 24% of items. Most of those are regular business and board reports that the minutes do not dispose of in writing. This archive never infers an outcome from the fact that someone called a vote.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, Feb 17, 2022
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Planning Commission, Feb 17, 2022
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PDD-22-0053 in full →PDD-22-0053 was taken up 4 times between Feb 17, 2022 and Jun 21, 2022, continued 1 time — this is appearance 1.
- Feb 17, 2022PlanningPC8▶No disposition in the minutesthis item
- Mar 8, 2022BoardP55▶Approved
- May 3, 2022BoardP58▶Continued
- Jun 21, 2022BoardP65▶Adopted
What was said
Machine transcription of 2m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 80% of 15 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Chair, how would you like to handle this? Do you want to do that? Let's go back
to the PC
right
now.
Yeah, PC four may take longer. I'd rather ask the question. Okay. The PC eight question is probably gonna be very quick. Let's do that first. I just my question is simply Are they reducing the employment? acreage or entitlements at all And this project doesn't appear they are, but I'm just want somebody to confirm that.
You're
the chosen one. Mr. Chairman, Clark Hobby, Hobby and Hobby, PA 109 North Brest Street, Tampa, Florida. No, we are not. All we're doing is there was a large swath of multifamily that ran through the middle of the site, and we're simply taking that out and attributing that land to single family three to the north of the wetland and to the community mixed use nine to the north. the South. So it doesn't affect it does not affect, for instance, David, the interstate mixed use area
or the office commercial area that's over by the interstate.
So all those acreages and
that's not affected in any way.
That was my only question. Thank you. I'm fine with you moving forward on that one.
Uh do we have a motion to approve uh PC eight?
Motion to approve.
Okay. Any further discussion? All in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed, like, sign?
Mr. Chair, do you want us to go back to PC three or do you want to do the land development code? Let's