An Ordinance Amending The Pasco County Comprehensive Plan; Providing For A Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment To Subarea Policy FLU 7.1.11: Cross Park PD; And Providing For Additional Text Amendments As Necessary For Internal Consistency; Providing For A Repealer, Severability, And An Effective Date.
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Approve
DispositionAdopted
Approved to adopt by a roll call vote with Commissioner Moore voting nay.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Aug 9, 2022
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Aug 9, 2022
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PDD-22-0020 in full →PDD-22-0020 was taken up 7 times between Jan 20, 2022 and Aug 9, 2022, continued 3 times — this is appearance 7.
What was said
Machine transcription of 12m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 97% of 74 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
are on to P eighty-four. Madam Chair, on this one, um as I understand it, P eighty-four and P96 will be heard consecutively.
Can I go ahead and do the publications on both?
Yes. And let's the the attorney doesn't have to stay with us if he doesn't want to.
Bye.
Okay, yeah. Okay. So item uh P eighty-four was published in the Tampe Times on January 5th, 2022, and item P96 was published in the Tampe Times on January on June 22nd, 2022.
Okay.
Good afternoon, Amy Heiler with Planning and Development. Item PDD 22-0020 is a comprehensive plan text amendment. This is the adoption hearing for CPAL 2125 Cross Park PDE. As you see here, this is the lo the subject property which is located in the South Market area. It does look like we're missing a slide. um for this one. So I'll step back just quite a bit. On
this one you are uh as I said adopting the proposed amendment so I'm gonna go ahead and read the ordinance into record. An ordinance amending the Pasco County Comprehensive Plan, providing for a comprehensive plan text amendment to sub-area policy flu 7.1.11 crosspark PD, and providing for additional text amendments as necessary for internal consistency, providing for a repealer, subrability, and an effective date. So, as previously stated, this is the adoption hearing for that. The proposal,
applicant is proposing a text amendment to sub-area policy flu 7.1.11 to change existing ALF rehabilitation, assisted living facility entitlements to multifamily residential and commercial uses. The location is at the southeast intersection of State Road 54 and Henley Road, approximately one mile west. Of Land O' Lakes Boulevard. The resolution to their proposal is to amend this the sub-area policy as previously stated, and there is a proposed substantial modification to the
existing cross-park master plan unit development accompanying this project. So these are the following policies that that the proposed comprehensive plan is consistent with. The general location, as stated, is at the intersection of State Road 54 and Henley Road, approximately one mile west of Land Oakes Boulevard. The existing future land use is PDF, which allows for an assisted living facility and rehabilitation, commercial and office
uses, and as previously stated the applicants requesting to change those entitlements to multifamily and office retail. So here is the master plan that has been provided. As you can see there's two access points, one off of Henley and one off of State Road 54. Secondary access for emergency is off of Henley. uh go a little bit deeper into the master plan. So the portion along the frontage along 54 is
proposed for medical and professional office. They are proposing 45,000 square feet in this general area. And the multifamily, which is proposed set back from State Road 54, and is buffered by the non-residential uses, which is supported by a policy directive from the board. This area is going to be proposed mixed-use multifamily with 280 dwelling units, 10,000 square feet of non-residential, which 5,000
of that non-residential square feet. feet will be vertically integrated with the multifamily and then the rest of the 5,000 square feet will look be located along the frontage of State Road 54. And with that, we recommend that the BCC approve the proposed amendment and adopt by roll call vote. If you have any questions on the Plan Amendment, I'd be happy to answer them.
Okay, board members, any questions?
Well, Madam Chair.
Commissioner Moore.
Like most know my opinion. Oh.
I'm just trying to uh make a decision on uh either we're gonna hear Sninety Six right after this.
Yeah.
You know we need again going back to statements I've made on multiple occasions and I don't know how many occasions along fifty-four or fifty-six corridor. Anytime we change a a zoning and um to for example a multifamily when we it'll use job creating sites, um it concerns me and will continue to concern me. Um whether I'm sitting up here uh or I'm uh citizen And alpha, like I'll be soon, so I'll still have those concerns and continue to have those concerns. So with that I'll be voting now.
Okay, um anybody else have any comments? All right, um is this a public hearing? Would anyone um here like to address P eighty four?
Okay.
Well that may get it to the applicant.
Hi, Elise Batsell on behalf of the applicant Live Development. Um just to follow up on Commissioner Moore's comment, um, we did do a job creation analysis and did submit that into re the record, and if I'm recalling the number correctly, because of the forty-five thousand square feet of medical office as well as the additional retail that we're providing, we are increasing the jobs by seventy-six based on what was permitted before. and what we have now. Um if you have further questions for the applicant, please let us know. And just as a a a quick housekeeping item, I think Amy mentioned a different
number. It's sub area policy seventeen, just for the record.
Okay. And um
I've
driven Henley many times. I'm pretty sure there are there's no Industry Down Henley, it's all residential. So you've got the industry up at the front. 'Cause right across the street is Stanley Steamer. And I think there's a church.
Yes, ma'am. Um and we'll go into more detail. We we're happy to put a more uh descriptive site plan up if you'd like. We also have the three levels. We can show that a little bit more in the next um presentation, but we just don't want to be duplicative with your time.
Yeah. Okay.
So um
better.
Yeah.
Thank you. Um 'Cause this isn't public copy, this is the applicant, so
Yeah,
so make sure we're on the same page here. Um okay you said you you did an economic and
You said you did an economic analysis analysis of t some type um when it comes to the jobs is it's included in this presentation that you gave us too.
And I'm sorry, Amy says that the analysis is the build out of the proposed sub-area policy would render ninety-three jobs I said seventy six. Yeah,
I think that's one of the th
one
of the things we were kinda debating, you know, last time around with, you know, okay, if you're taking some of this and adding additional office you know, compared to what you were previously, um, is it still more jobs? Again, you know I you know I might An ALF is one thing, but a nursing home is another, right? There's more jobs in a nursing home than there's an ALF. That's just that's a fact of the matter. And it's gonna matter how many beds you have as well in that ALF or um in that uh nursing home, you
know. So I guess that's a question to be asked too. We don't know that, right? Because you don't have a user. You don't have somebody that's coming in to say I was gonna build a three hundred fifty bed um ALF and a 200 bed um SNF, which would be a nursing home. No, I'm just using that as a point. We just don't know that answer. So I appreciate the economic analysis. Don't not sure if I can agree with it 100% knowing and actually coming from that industry myself and being in the industry for a long time knowing how many jobs for nurses, PTs, OT, speech language
pathologists, CNAs, administrative staff, etc. could possibly be in that. So again, I'm not telling telling you it's wrong, but I would question it depending on how large that facility actually is. is and if it's a full SNF with an ALF or if it would just be an ALF or versus you know a SNF by itself. You know, that's those are things would have to come in the equation. But again, so again appreciate it. Not saying you're wrong, just saying I can't say this is a hundred percent accurate with not knowing that um that they
answer those questions.
We actually uh do have at least an indication of the end user. And it is forty five thousand square feet of medical office, not office, which tip typically generates more jobs as well. Um and I'm happy to have Tim from Live Development come up and tell you at least what he can about the user that he's speaking to and I think he's pretty far along. If you think that would be helpful.
I don't I don't I think it would probably be better for ninety six than this, don't you? Mr Stock Snyder, I think that would probably pair well with ninety six versus versus uh
Well if you're I mean if you're approving the comprehensive plan amendment and that and that this goes to whether or not That changes your opinion. I would I would hear the testimony. That's
fine, that's fine. I didn't know if we
wanted
to wait for ninety seconds. I don't find that.
Yeah, I guess because and I remember that this developer also builds didn't he s doesn't this developer also
do ALFs?
But
yeah, I I think maybe if you remember if you recall and Tim's gonna tell you a little bit more. He looked at the viability of an ALF. Yeah, because they could do that. They would do that. All right. Without all this. It's a good
word.
Uh good afternoon, Tim McKeetron with Live Development. Um, when we were before the board at the transmittal hearing, I went through the process of showing uh both the new development and the site plan and the viability of it today, but also going back on the history a little bit. About three years ago, we looked at this property specifically as an assisted living facility. We have a senior housing group here at Live. We went through the process of doing a viability study, market study. We found that there was was a number of other projects coming on that would provide too much supply. Then we faced the COVID pandemic
and that was problematic for our development of this property as an ALF. Since we last met together uh and we had the successful vote on the transmittal hearing, we have gone out to the market to gauge interest on the medical office component. And we're happy to say there's been a lot of interest in that. Uh there was expressed interest from the board that there may be, you know, uh local use for this property. We have found that use. We found those users, and they're very interested in in finalizing our contract with them. Um I would I I'm under an interesting. So I can't state who it is, but it is a top five hospital
group that is looking at the property to do a medical office in a standalone emergency room. So there's very significant use for this property, but it's all subject to us being successful in the comp plan and also the zoning.
Okay. Um all right, anybody else? Public comment. Uh yeah. Uh any public comment? Yeah, uh
That's it.
Hi, Christy Zimmer. Do I need to give you my address? Yes you do. [address removed]. I'm opposed to this project because it is supposed to be an ALF or I LF, but the problem we're seeing is are there going to be any traffic improvements required on this project? Because when you're putting this kind of traffic out onto Henley Road or 54 without any infrastructure improvements, you're going to have some problems. I would ask that you at least please have them put in traffic control devices of some sort within that intersection if
you do approve it.
Okay, so we'll hear if there's any um that is a red light already, right? There's no light. No, they I will
be adding a light though.
Okay.
And paying for it.
And this is a comprehensive plan hearing. So that'll be addressed on
the and that's a condition of the MPD. Okay. Thank you. And uh Madam Chair, just to let you know, no one is on WebEx for this item.
Okay. I seeing that then it is to the board. Roll call vote.
Motion to approve. Is it a
roll call? No. It is. Oh, it is a rolling
call.
Okay. Motion to approve and a second.
Okay. Roll call vote. District 1, Commissioner Oakley. Aye. District 2, Commissioner Moore. Nay. District 4, Commissioner Fitzpatrick. Aye. District 5, Commissioner Mariano. Aye. District 3, Chairman Stork.