Development Agreement (Consent) – Aprile Development Agreement Connected City– King Lake Partners Owner, LP – Development Agreement For The Aprile MPUD to Design, Permit, and Construct Roadway Improvements In Exchange for Transportation Development Fee Credits.
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Approve
No disposition in the minutes
The approved minutes do not say what became of this item. That is a gap in the record, not a decision. It is the normal state for 24% of items. Most of those are regular business and board reports that the minutes do not dispose of in writing. This archive never infers an outcome from the fact that someone called a vote.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, May 18, 2023
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Planning Commission, May 18, 2023
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PDD-23-0360 in full →PDD-23-0360 was taken up 3 times between May 18, 2023 and Jun 20, 2023, continued 1 time — this is appearance 1.
- May 18, 2023PlanningPC5▶No disposition in the minutesthis item
- Jun 6, 2023BoardP42▶Continued
- Jun 20, 2023BoardP49▶Approved
What was said
Machine transcription of 2m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 100% of 20 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Okay. Um onto the consent items. PC five, PDD 23-0360. It's a development agreement, an Aprilly development agreement, Connected City, King Lake Partners Owner, LP, a development agreement for the Aprilly MPUD to design, permit, and construct roadway improvements in exchange for transportation development fee credits. This is coming with a recommendation for approval.
Okay.
Um, I believe we have opposition for PC six, so if you would like to pull that one for a regular item. All right. And then PC7, PDD 23-0189. It's a small scale comprehensive plan amendment. C Pass 22-27, RBR properties PAW, providing for a small-scale comprehensive plan amendment to the future land use map, map-2- dash fifteen in Sheet twelve, from Res three residential three dwelling units per acre to I L Industrial Light
on approximately eleven point five two acres of real property located on the north side of State Road fifty two, approximately point one five miles east of Giddens Road, and a map amendment to the future land use map two dash nine, amending the sub-area policy two dash nine fifty two paw materials, and a comprehensive Plan text amendment to sub-area policy flu seven point one point five two. PAW materials providing for a text amendment as necessary for intel internal consistency, providing for repealer,
severability, and effective date. It's coming with a recommendation for approval. All right. Is the applicant present?
Anyone
here to object?
Are are we hearing the the two consent items? Uh Yes. Is this a vote for the both of those items? Yeah, I think those are the only two consent items, right?
Yeah,
PC five and
PC seven.
Yes,
correct. Okay. So we have two consent items. I see no objection on either one of them. So do we have a motion?
So
moved.
Second.
Any further discussion on either one? All in favor signify by saying aye.
Aye.
Aye.
Opposed, like, sign? Okay.