Large-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Consent) – CPAL 22(08) SR 52 Groves – Providing for Transmittal of a Large-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Future Land Use (FLU) Maps (2-15 and Sheet 12) Changing from RES-3 (Residential - 3 du/ga) and IL (Industrial/Light) to RES-6 (Residential – 6 du/ga) on Approximately 68.25 Acres of Real Property, Located on the North Side of State Road 52 and West of Kent Grove Drive

1:41:17Okay. Uh we only have one item on the public hearing for a consent agenda. So I'm going to skip the consent part and we're just going to go right to item P 59.

1:41:25Okay, P59 was advertised in the Tampa Bay Times on May 10th, 2023 and by affidavit of certified mailings and site postings. Okay.

1:41:33Mr. Return, do you want the procedures even though there's

1:41:37one do we need? I mean it's up to you. you. We've got one item, so we

1:41:42just we can just

1:41:46Your planner is going to be pulling it off consent anyway. So I think we've got to do that. We can do we can do the time frames if if it becomes an issue. Okay. All right,

1:41:56P P fifty nine. Mr. Chairman, uh Commissioner, my name is Ed Zodi and I'm with Long Range Planning. The matter before you would have been a uh transmittal and it was initially on consent, however, there was a change made. Actually this morning. Uh which we will support but I wanted to uh Provide that to you through uh a presentation. Okay.

1:42:20As you know, the property is located in the central market area, excuse me, on the north side of State Road 52 and west of Kent Grove Drive. The proposal is to amend uh the future land use from Res 3 and I L to Res 6 to allow for a multifamily development of 231 townhomes. The resolution will be to amend flu map 215 and Sheet 12. There is an MPUD that's running concurrently with this and actually uh as I indicated to

1:42:51Commissioner Starkey. The M P U D and This is a good one. adoption will both occur on July eleventh, so they'll both be here t to review.

1:43:03Just to generally show the con uh the consistency, the following policies are consistent with the proposed comprehensive plan amendment. Res 6. Res 6 is to recognize those areas that are suited for single-family and multifamily residential development. The proposal here is for 231 units. Uh it is also eligible for a density bump because of the Cat1 wetlands that surround the property.

1:43:33It's in the central market area and it is highly encouraged to uh pro the proposed development utilize this missing middle housing and approach the development of clustered and compact form, which is occurring here. And the land use, the Res six, is a identified as a Compatible transitional land use with the Res III. We as we had discussed in the past, there is a limitation on the conversion of the important employment

1:44:04locations. For your information, both uh Pasco EDC and Economic Growth reviewed this site and by virtue of the wetlands deemed it wasn't appropriate for uh industrial use. Now that is a subjective analysis. The next plan, however, the policy flu one two three prohibits industrial use with respect that's consist uh contiguous excuse me to uh a category one wetland.

1:44:38The economic development analysis was provided and showed that this site, this proposal, will produce more in revenue than consuming services than the uh net of the I. Now the change that's been made Is it? In an effort to protect the commercial development which is to the east. They're gonna move their east property line Approximately twenty feet to the west for about a hundred and eighty feet. So

1:45:08we're talking about thirty-eight hundred or thirty-nine hundred square feet in a sixty-eight acre tract of land. It is our position that that does protect the commercial development. And does not adversely impact this site. And we would uh propose that

1:45:29The board approved the uh transmitter to the Department of Economic Opportunity and for review and any comments. Yeah.

1:45:37And I just I'll just say as a resident commissioner, I've I've looked at this site and I think they've also agreed to go fee simple townhomes as well.

1:45:45They're gonna plat their they are the MPUD includes a plat of the two hundred and thirty-one towns. Okay. Any questions for the staff?

1:45:57I didn't we'll have the applicant address it. Thank you. Commissioner Starkey.

1:46:02Yeah. Is this the one that you told me this morning was going on seven eleven?

1:46:06Yes.

1:46:07So why are we voting on it now? What did I miss?

1:46:09For transmittal to DEO so we can get their comments. Okay. The adoption will be on seven eleven. Okay. Um

1:46:15assuming the

1:46:16comments come back favorably.

1:46:17In in my meetings with them, it was just important to me as they go through this process that that um they have a connection to another road. To the uh or a stub out to so that they can have a connection one day. To the north, I think, is what they decided on, but can't just only Come out on State Road 52. That would just be a disaster for fifty-two. And that comes out.

1:46:43Yeah. Right. That's just all the comments I would say.

1:46:46So

1:46:47yeah, the

1:46:49Property.

1:46:50The reduction of the Plan amendment will leave An I L strip or a res three strip or both?

1:46:59Right now it looks like an I L strip.

1:47:01Okay.

1:47:02Trying to p I'm trying to pull the uh

1:47:05Any other questions for staff?

1:47:07That's the sorry. Thank you.

1:47:10Do they have to be sworn in? What's that? People that are gonna talk on this one, do they have to be sworn in as a public hearing?

1:47:16Uh they won't. No. No. Um this is a comprehensive plan amendment, so no, they won't need to be swarted.

1:47:23Okay.

1:47:23That'll be that also.

1:47:24So we don't have any? Not well we may have some public comment, but let me just Yeah, no, okay.

1:47:29But this was advertised. Mr. Weightman, thank you. The IL strip, that's the thirty nine hundred Yes sir. All right.

1:47:38Yeah. Good. Okay. Okay. And the applicant? Thank you.

1:47:46Barbara Will High, 6327 Grand Boulevard, Newport Rachie for the Applicant. Um yes, our MPUD plan has two stub outs to the north. Um what was the other question? Don't you remember?

1:47:59Well, that's for later.

1:48:00That was okay. Plotted townhomes, yes. So we did have the ability when we first made this application to do a builder rent or platted townhome. All the paperwork has been changed to platted townhomes, working on the conditions of approval with staff for the MPUD, and I can tell you standing here that they only say platted townhomes. So we heard the commentary loud and clear and made the changes to both our MPUD conditions as well as our MPD plan, which you'll see on 7-11. So how wide are the lots, Barbara? I

1:48:33Do not have a recollection of exactly what the conditions say as far as the width of the lots for the MPUD. We're just working on that with staff now.

1:48:40Yeah. This is your comprehensive plan.

1:48:42Correct, correct. Yeah.

1:48:43Um Barbara, will that leave a usable strip of I L or are you are you just

1:48:49We're just pulling back our boundary um so that

1:48:51it

1:48:51so that it doesn't so

1:48:52that you you're basically you're leaving a buffer

1:48:56To the commercial. Yeah. There's a commercial piece to our east. They reached out. And s and said you know they didn't want our residential

1:49:06So

1:49:06that may

1:49:07leave you with non usable. Acreage, but

1:49:11we wanted to take care of our neighbor.

1:49:16what you're doing basically in that matter. Okay, thank you.

1:49:20We're working with our neighbor and yes, we understand.

1:49:23Okay, thank you. So this is a public hearing. P fifty nine, anyone from the in the audience want to test uh speak. Anyone who had access to the board? Okay, it's to the board.

1:49:36That don't want residential. Mr. Commercial. Second.

1:49:40Yeah.

1:49:41And roll call?

1:49:43It does not say that.

1:49:44No.

1:49:44This

1:49:44would

1:49:45be a