Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Rescission – Sugar Creek DRI Development of Regional Impact - John Azouki - A Request to Rescind the Sugar Creek DRI No. 038 – North of State Road 52 and East of Colony Road - No Funding Required
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Approve
DispositionApproved
Approved Staff’s recommendation by a roll call vote.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Jun 20, 2023
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Jun 20, 2023
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PDD-23-0423 in full →Heard once. PDD-23-0423 appears on no other agenda in the archive.
- Jun 20, 2023BoardC6▶Approvedthis item
What was said
Machine transcription of 1m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 100% of 14 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Item C six was published in the Tampa Bay Times on June seventh, twenty twenty-three.
Item C6 is PDD 230423. It's a development of regional impact rescission for the Sugar Creek DRI, development of regional impact. John Izuki, it's a request to rescind the Sugar Creek DRI number 38. And it's generally located on the north of State Road 52 and east of Colony Road. And we ask that you approve the rescision.
Okay. Any discussion from the board? Mm. As a public hearing, I'll I'll ask for public comment. Okay. Does anyone from the public want to speak to s item C six?
Mr. Chairman I have no one signed up and no one on WebEx for this item.
Okay.
With a second.
Thank you.
And roll call vote.
District one, Commissioner Oakley.
Aye.
District two, Commissioner Weightman. Aye. District three, Commissioner Starkey. Aye. District four, Commissioner Bradford.
Aye.
District five, Chairman Mariano.
Aye. Motion passes five O. And then we'll go back to the consent agenda? Yes.